IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2024i1p107-d1554243.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluation of the Effectiveness of High-Level Construction of Rural Living Environment in China Under the Incentive Policies

Author

Listed:
  • Jiarui Wang

    (Agro-Environmental Protection Institute, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Tianjin 300191, China
    Key Laboratory for Rural Toilet and Sewage Treatment Technology, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Tianjin 300191, China
    Institute of Environment and Sustainable Development in Agriculture, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, China
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Shuoxin Yang

    (Agro-Environmental Protection Institute, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Tianjin 300191, China
    Key Laboratory for Rural Toilet and Sewage Treatment Technology, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Tianjin 300191, China
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Siwei Hu

    (Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China)

  • Qian Li

    (Agro-Environmental Protection Institute, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Tianjin 300191, China)

  • Chong Liu

    (Institute of Environment and Sustainable Development in Agriculture, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, China)

  • Yi Gao

    (Biogas Institute of Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Chengdu 610041, China)

  • Jianyin Huang

    (School of Agriculture and Food Sustainability, University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD 4072, Australia)

  • Christopher W. K. Chow

    (Sustainable Infrastructure and Resource Management (SIRM), UniSA STEM, University of South Australia, Mawson Lakes, SA 5095, Australia)

  • Fang Liu

    (Agro-Environmental Protection Institute, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Tianjin 300191, China
    Key Laboratory for Rural Toilet and Sewage Treatment Technology, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Tianjin 300191, China)

  • Xiangqun Zheng

    (Agro-Environmental Protection Institute, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Tianjin 300191, China
    Institute of Environment and Sustainable Development in Agriculture, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, China)

Abstract

Improving the rural living environment is of great significance in enhancing the life quality of rural residents and promoting rural sustainable development. The Chinese government initiated a nationwide three-year action in 2018, followed by a five-year campaign starting in 2021, to improve the rural living environment. Despite these efforts, comprehensive assessment covering multiple facets of the rural living environment at the national level remained scarce. A novel evaluation method was proposed in this study that included seven aspects and nineteen indicators, applied AHP for weighting, and PLS-SEM to analyze the relationships between variables. Then, the completion of key tasks of rural living environment improvement in 37 counties, which were incentivized by the State Council on account of its excellent governance results, was comprehensively investigated and evaluated. The assessment of key tasks in the 37 incentivized counties revealed high completion in rural household solid waste disposal, domestic sewage treatment, and toilet improvement. However, the level of the rural living environment was uneven among different regions, and the progress varied in different key tasks. The funds input had a greater impact on the comprehensive level of rural living environment than social and economic factors. Accordingly, the government should provide more targeted financial and policy support to underdeveloped areas. And priority should be given to the sewage treatment and sanitation, especially in rural and remote areas. Furthermore, local governments should diversify funding sources to ensure the sustainability of rural living environment development. These findings provide a theoretical basis for developing policies and specific plans to address the challenges of financial investment and rural living environment management in China and other developing countries and regions worldwide.

Suggested Citation

  • Jiarui Wang & Shuoxin Yang & Siwei Hu & Qian Li & Chong Liu & Yi Gao & Jianyin Huang & Christopher W. K. Chow & Fang Liu & Xiangqun Zheng, 2024. "Evaluation of the Effectiveness of High-Level Construction of Rural Living Environment in China Under the Incentive Policies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(1), pages 1-24, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2024:i:1:p:107-:d:1554243
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/1/107/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/1/107/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Madjid Tavana & Mehdi Soltanifar & Francisco J. Santos-Arteaga, 2023. "Analytical hierarchy process: revolution and evolution," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 326(2), pages 879-907, July.
    2. Bowen Wang & Desheng Hu & Diandian Hao & Meng Li & Yanan Wang, 2021. "Influence of Government Information on Farmers’ Participation in Rural Residential Environment Governance: Mediating Effect Analysis Based on Moderation," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(23), pages 1-15, November.
    3. Yongsheng Wang & Qi Wen & Dazhuan Ge & Bangbang Zhang, 2023. "Rural Land Use Progress and Its Implication for Rural Revitalization in China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-6, November.
    4. Hair, Joe F. & Howard, Matt C. & Nitzl, Christian, 2020. "Assessing measurement model quality in PLS-SEM using confirmatory composite analysis," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 101-110.
    5. Yangli Zhang & Qiang Fan, 2020. "The Application of the Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process in the Assessment and Improvement of the Human Settlement Environment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-21, February.
    6. Pengyan Wang & Xiaofei Qin & Yurui Li, 2021. "Satisfaction Evaluation of Rural Human Settlements in Northwest China: Method and Application," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-13, August.
    7. Zeng, Chao & Niu, Dongjie & Li, Hangfen & Zhou, Tao & Zhao, Youcai, 2016. "Public perceptions and economic values of source-separated collection of rural solid waste: A pilot study in China," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 166-173.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhou, Liang & Chen, Wei & Xu, Shang, 2022. "Do rural residents care about domestic waste management? A hedonic analysis of housing prices in rural China," 2022 Annual Meeting, July 31-August 2, Anaheim, California 322212, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    2. Sadiq, Muhammad & Nawaz, Muhammad Atif & Sharif, Arshian & Hanif, Sobia, 2024. "Bridging green supply chain practices and environmental performance in Chinese semiconductor sector: With the role of energy efficiency and green HRM," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 277(C).
    3. Mai Mostafa Awad & Abd‘Elazez Hashem & Hend Mohamed Naguib, 2022. "The Impact of Lean Management Practices on Economic Sustainability in Services Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-27, July.
    4. Hayford Asare Obeng & Richard Arhinful & Leviticus Mensah & Jerry Seth Owusu-Sarfo, 2024. "Assessing the Influence of the Knowledge Management Cycle on Job Satisfaction and Organizational Culture Considering the Interplay of Employee Engagement," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(20), pages 1-28, October.
    5. Morais, Ana Catarina & Ishida, Akira & Matsuda, Ruriko, 2024. "Ethical food consumption drivers in Japan. A S–O-R framework application using PLS-SEM with a MGA assessment based on clustering," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
    6. Kautish, Pradeep & Paço, Arminda & Thaichon, Park, 2022. "Sustainable consumption and plastic packaging: Relationships among product involvement, perceived marketplace influence and choice behavior," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    7. Zhikun Ding & Xinyue Huang & Xinrui Wang & Qiaohui Chen & Jiasheng Zhang & Zezhou Wu, 2024. "Investigating the Determinants of Construction Stakeholders’ Intention to Use Construction and Demolition Waste Recycling Products Based on the S-O-R Model in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-17, March.
    8. Sangryeong Lee & Soo-Kyoung Lee & Jin-Woo Park, 2024. "The Effect of Service Quality and Sustainability Practices on Brand Equity: The Case of Korean Air Passengers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-20, May.
    9. Henda Omri & Anis Omri & Abdessalem Abbassi, 2024. "Macro-level determinants of entrepreneurial behavior and motivation," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 20(4), pages 2629-2667, December.
    10. Trinh Le Tan & Khanh Nguyen Chau Ngoc & Hien Le Thi Thanh & Hoai Nguyen Thi Thu & Uyen Vo Truong Hoang, 2024. "Enhancing Repurchase Intention on Digital Platforms Based on Shopping Well-Being Through Shopping Value, Trust and Impulsive Buying," SAGE Open, , vol. 14(3), pages 21582440241, September.
    11. Tarcia Camily Cavalcante Quezado & Nuno Fortes & William Quezado Figueiredo Cavalcante, 2022. "The Influence of Corporate Social Responsibility and Business Ethics on Brand Fidelity: The Importance of Brand Love and Brand Attitude," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-20, March.
    12. Talwar, Shalini & Kaur, Puneet & Escobar, Octavio & Lan, Sai, 2022. "Virtual reality tourism to satisfy wanderlust without wandering: An unconventional innovation to promote sustainability," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 128-143.
    13. Ashraf Sharif & Saira Hanif Soroya & Shakil Ahmad & Khalid Mahmood, 2021. "Antecedents of Self-Disclosure on Social Networking Sites (SNSs): A Study of Facebook Users," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-21, January.
    14. Mohd Yusoff Yusliza & Amirudin Amirudin & Raden Aswin Rahadi & Nik Afzan Nik Sarah Athirah & Thurasamy Ramayah & Zikri Muhammad & Francesca Dal Mas & Maurizio Massaro & Jumadil Saputra & Safiek Mokhli, 2020. "An Investigation of Pro-Environmental Behaviour and Sustainable Development in Malaysia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-21, August.
    15. Tingting Zhang & Dan He & Tian Kuang & Ke Chen, 2022. "Effect of Rural Human Settlement Environment around Nature Reserves on Farmers’ Well-Being: A Field Survey Based on 1002 Farmer Households around Six Nature Reserves in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(11), pages 1-18, May.
    16. Qi Wei & Rui Wang & Chuan-Yang Ruan, 2024. "Similarity Measures of Probabilistic Interval Preference Ordering Sets and Their Applications in Decision-Making," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-26, October.
    17. Pipatpong Fakfare & Walanchalee Wattanacharoensil, 2023. "Low‐carbon tourism for island destinations: A crucial alternative for sustainable development," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(1), pages 180-197, February.
    18. Yan, Ruihe & Gong, Xiang, 2022. "Peer-to-peer accommodation platform affordance: Scale development and empirical investigation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 922-938.
    19. Eric De Vera Reynoso & Yogi Tri Prasetyo & Satria Fadil Persada & Klint Allen Mariñas & Omar Paolo Benito & Reny Nadlifatin & Ma. Janice J. Gumasing & Irene Dyah Ayuwati, 2024. "The Effect of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Turnover Intentions among Field Technicians: A Case Study in Philippines," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(15), pages 1-16, July.
    20. Maria Rodrigues & João F. Proença & Rita Macedo, 2023. "Determinants of the Purchase of Secondhand Products: An Approach by the Theory of Planned Behaviour," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-18, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2024:i:1:p:107-:d:1554243. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.