IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i9p3717-d1385606.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Techno-Eco-Efficiency Assessment of Using Recycled Steel Fibre in Concrete

Author

Listed:
  • Wahidul K. Biswas

    (Sustainable Engineering Group, Curtin University, Perth, WA 6102, Australia)

  • Xihong Zhang

    (School of Civil and Mechanical Engineering, Curtin University, Perth, WA 6102, Australia)

  • Corey Matters

    (Rubbergem, Naval Base, Perth, WA 6165, Australia)

  • Mitra Maboud

    (Rubbergem, Naval Base, Perth, WA 6165, Australia)

Abstract

The steel industry is one the three biggest producers of carbon dioxide and it is experiencing technical challenges due to the gradual decrease in the quality of iron ore. Steel is extensively used in the construction industry for structural applications like steel components, while steel fibres are intensively used as additives to concrete in order to improve its performance. It is thus important to consider the use of recycled steel as a replacement for virgin steel in order to address the aforementioned environmental consequences. This paper applies the eco-efficiency framework to determine the economic and environmental implications of the use of recycled fibre in concrete as a replacement for virgin steel. A number of concrete mixes were considered that used virgin, recycled, and treated recycled rebar in concrete. The eco-efficiency framework, which uses a life-cycle assessment approach to calculate the environmental and economic values of concrete mixes in order to determine the portfolio positions of these concrete mixes, was used for comparison purposes and to establish the eco-efficient option(s). Whilst the recovery and recycling process is energy-intensive, the use of recycled steel fibre in reinforced concrete has been found to be eco-efficient and deliver the same level of mechanical performance compared to that obtained using virgin steel fibre. Treating steel fibre could improve its technical performance, but it was found to increase both costs and environmental impacts and was therefore identified as not being eco-efficient.

Suggested Citation

  • Wahidul K. Biswas & Xihong Zhang & Corey Matters & Mitra Maboud, 2024. "Techno-Eco-Efficiency Assessment of Using Recycled Steel Fibre in Concrete," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(9), pages 1-15, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:9:p:3717-:d:1385606
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/9/3717/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/9/3717/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Li, Qianwen & Long, Ruyin & Chen, Hong, 2018. "Differences and influencing factors for Chinese urban resident willingness to pay for green housings: Evidence from five first-tier cities in China," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 229(C), pages 299-313.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhixing Li & Xin He & Zhuojun Ding & Md. Mehrab Hossain & Md. Tanvir Rahman Rifat & Md. Habibur Rahman Sobuz & Yafei Zhao, 2024. "Analysis of influencing factors for housing construction technology in Desakota Village and town communities in China," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-17, December.
    2. Shiela Mae C. Ilagan & Ardvin Kester S. Ong & Josephine D. German & Ma. Janice J. Gumasing & Kyla Marie P. Pabalan, 2024. "Holistic Antecedent Analysis of Behavioral Intention among Green Consumers in the Philippines: A Sustainability Theory of the Planned Behavior Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(10), pages 1-23, May.
    3. Wang, Zhaohua & Li, Hao & Deng, Nana & Cheng, Kaiwei & Lu, Bin & Zhang, Bin & Wang, Bo, 2020. "How to effectively implement an incentive-based residential electricity demand response policy? Experience from large-scale trials and matching questionnaires," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 141(C).
    4. Tong Hu & Abdullah Al Mamun & Mohammad Nurul Hassan Reza & Mengling Wu & Qing Yang, 2024. "Examining consumers’ willingness to pay premium price for organic food," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-15, December.
    5. Yelly Kwesy Lawluvy & Albert Agbeko Ahiadu & Olivia Kwakyewaa Ntim, 2022. "Willingness To Pay For Green Buildings In Ghana: The Impact Of Benefit Sensitisation," AfRES 2022-032, African Real Estate Society (AfRES).
    6. Sonia Abed-Elgani & Tamar Trop & Saher Ali & Boris A. Portnov, 2024. "Factors Affecting the Willingness of Arab Residents in Israel to Pay for Green Buildings: Results of a Survey among Potential Homebuyers in Acre and Nazareth," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-22, January.
    7. Wen, Tianzuo & Qiang, Wei & Liu, Xingjian, 2022. "Exploring the geography of urban comprehensive development in mainland Chinese cities," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 115(C).
    8. Tianlin Zhai & Jing Wang & Ying Fang & Longyang Huang & Jingjing Liu & Chenchen Zhao, 2021. "Integrating Ecosystem Services Supply, Demand and Flow in Ecological Compensation: A Case Study of Carbon Sequestration Services," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-19, February.
    9. Lee, Louis S.H. & Jim, C.Y., 2019. "Energy benefits of green-wall shading based on novel-accurate apportionment of short-wave radiation components," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 238(C), pages 1506-1518.
    10. Wang, Yao & Lin, Boqiang & Li, Minyang, 2021. "Is household electricity saving a virtuous circle? A case study of the first-tier cities in China," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 285(C).
    11. Xiaoyun Zhang & Feng Dong, 2020. "Why Do Consumers Make Green Purchase Decisions? Insights from a Systematic Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(18), pages 1-25, September.
    12. Yajing Zhang & Jingfeng Yuan & Lingzhi Li & Hu Cheng, 2019. "Proposing a Value Field Model for Predicting Homebuyers’ Purchasing Behavior of Green Residential Buildings: A Case Study in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(23), pages 1-31, December.
    13. Yunxia Liu & Xunpeng Shi & Ya Ping Wang & Tao Sun, 2019. "Promoting Green Residential Buildings in China: Bridging the Gap between Design and Operation to Improve Occupants’ Residential Satisfaction," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(13), pages 1-18, June.
    14. Gan, Xiaolong & Liu, Lanchi & Wen, Tao & Webber, Ronald, 2022. "Modelling interrelationships between barriers to adopting green building technologies in China's rural housing via grey-DEMATEL," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    15. Wan, Bingyue & Tian, Lixin & Zhu, Naiping & Gu, Liqin & Zhang, Guangyong, 2018. "A new endogenous growth model for green low-carbon behavior and its comprehensive effects," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 230(C), pages 1332-1346.
    16. Wengang Zhang & Baiqing Sun & Feng Xu, 2020. "Promoting Green Product Development Performance via Leader Green Transformationality and Employee Green Self-Efficacy: The Moderating Role of Environmental Regulation," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(18), pages 1-17, September.
    17. Yongsheng Jiang & Dong Zhao & Dedong Wang & Yudong Xing, 2019. "Sustainable Performance of Buildings through Modular Prefabrication in the Construction Phase: A Comparative Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(20), pages 1-15, October.
    18. Shiwen Zhao & Liwen Chen, 2021. "Exploring Residents’ Purchase Intention of Green Housings in China: An Extended Perspective of Perceived Value," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(8), pages 1-19, April.
    19. Ellen Thio & MeiXuen Tan & Liang Li & Muhammad Salman & Xingle Long & Huaping Sun & Bangzhu Zhu, 2022. "The estimation of influencing factors for carbon emissions based on EKC hypothesis and STIRPAT model: Evidence from top 10 countries," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(9), pages 11226-11259, September.
    20. Elahi, Ehsan & Khalid, Zainab & Zhang, Zhixin, 2022. "Understanding farmers’ intention and willingness to install renewable energy technology: A solution to reduce the environmental emissions of agriculture," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 309(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:9:p:3717-:d:1385606. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.