IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i9p3689-d1384976.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Unveiling the Significance: Sustainability and Environmental Disclosure in Saudi Arabia through Stakeholders’ Theory

Author

Listed:
  • Laila Mohamed Alshawadfy Aladwey

    (Department of Accounting, Imam Mohammad Ibn Saud Islamic University (IMSIU), Riyadh 11432, Saudi Arabia
    Department of Accounting, Tanta University, Gharbia 31521, Egypt)

  • Raghad Abdulkarim Alsudays

    (Department of Accounting, Imam Mohammad Ibn Saud Islamic University (IMSIU), Riyadh 11432, Saudi Arabia)

Abstract

Our study investigates sustainability and environmental disclosure in Saudi Arabian accounting, focusing on stakeholder accountability. Employing content analysis and close reading, we examine disclosures in the annual reports of 18 companies from 2008 to 2018. Findings reveal limited disclosures, influenced by interpretations of Islam and government emphasis. Despite sector-specific attention to environmental issues, disclosures lack depth. The study offers insights into managerial motivations, highlighting divergent stakeholder priorities and moral obligations. Policy implications suggest mandatory regulations could enhance accountability and encourage comprehensive disclosures. The research underscores the significance of contextual understanding in shaping accounting practices, particularly in regions like Saudi Arabia. Regulatory changes could improve corporate reporting on environmental and sustainability matters, addressing societal needs more effectively.

Suggested Citation

  • Laila Mohamed Alshawadfy Aladwey & Raghad Abdulkarim Alsudays, 2024. "Unveiling the Significance: Sustainability and Environmental Disclosure in Saudi Arabia through Stakeholders’ Theory," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(9), pages 1-20, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:9:p:3689-:d:1384976
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/9/3689/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/9/3689/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mohammad Al-Saidi & Esmat Zaidan & Suzanne Hammad, 2019. "Participation modes and diplomacy of Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) countries towards the global sustainability agenda," Development in Practice, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(5), pages 545-558, July.
    2. repec:eme:aaaj00:aaaj-04-2018-3461 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Rania Kamla & Sonja Gallhofer & Jim Haslam, 2006. "Islam, nature and accounting: Islamic principles and the notion of accounting for the environment," Accounting Forum, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 30(3), pages 245-265, September.
    4. Abeng, Tanri, 1997. "Business Ethics in Islamic Context: Perspectives of a Muslim Business Leader," Business Ethics Quarterly, Cambridge University Press, vol. 7(3), pages 47-54, July.
    5. Juliette Senn & Sophie Giordano-Spring, 2020. "The limits of environmental accounting disclosure: enforcement of regulations, standards and interpretative strategies," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 33(6), pages 1367-1393, June.
    6. Sefa Hayibor, 2017. "Is Fair Treatment Enough? Augmenting the Fairness-Based Perspective on Stakeholder Behaviour," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 140(1), pages 43-64, January.
    7. Patten, Dennis M., 2002. "The relation between environmental performance and environmental disclosure: a research note," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 27(8), pages 763-773, November.
    8. Craig Deegan & Michaela Rankin, 1996. "Do Australian companies report environmental news objectively?," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 9(2), pages 50-67, May.
    9. Markus J. Milne & Ralph W. Adler, 1999. "Exploring the reliability of social and environmental disclosures content analysis," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 12(2), pages 237-256, May.
    10. Andrew Crane & Trish Ruebottom, 2011. "Stakeholder Theory and Social Identity: Rethinking Stakeholder Identification," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 102(1), pages 77-87, March.
    11. Farmaki, Anna & Farmakis, Panagiotis, 2018. "A stakeholder approach to CSR in hotels," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 58-60.
    12. Jeffrey Unerman, 2000. "Methodological issues ‐ Reflections on quantification in corporate social reporting content analysis," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 13(5), pages 667-681, December.
    13. David Hackston & Markus J. Milne, 1996. "Some determinants of social and environmental disclosures in New Zealand companies," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 9(1), pages 77-108, March.
    14. Phillips, Robert A., 1997. "Stakeholder Theory and A Principle of Fairness," Business Ethics Quarterly, Cambridge University Press, vol. 7(1), pages 51-66, January.
    15. Yingjun Lu & Indra Abeysekera, 2017. "What Do Stakeholders Care About? Investigating Corporate Social and Environmental Disclosure in China," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 144(1), pages 169-184, August.
    16. Juliette Senn & Sophie Giordano-Spring, 2020. "The limits of environmental accounting disclosure: enforcement of regulations, standards and interpretative strategies," Post-Print hal-03138508, HAL.
    17. Nongnooch Kuasirikun & Michael Sherer, 2004. "Corporate social accounting disclosure in Thailand," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 17(4), pages 629-660, September.
    18. Hasnas, John, 1998. "The Normative Theories of Business Ethics: A Guide for the Perplexed," Business Ethics Quarterly, Cambridge University Press, vol. 8(1), pages 19-42, January.
    19. Carol A. Adams, 2004. "The ethical, social and environmental reporting‐performance portrayal gap," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 17(5), pages 731-757, December.
    20. Deegan, Craig & Blomquist, Christopher, 2006. "Stakeholder influence on corporate reporting: An exploration of the interaction between WWF-Australia and the Australian minerals industry," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 31(4-5), pages 343-372.
    21. Caterina Tantalo & Richard L. Priem, 2016. "Value creation through stakeholder synergy," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(2), pages 314-329, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Miguel Pombinho & Ana Fialho & Jorge Novas, 2023. "Readability of Sustainability Reports: A Bibliometric Analysis and Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-21, December.
    2. Pamela Kent & Tamara Zunker, 2017. "A stakeholder analysis of employee disclosures in annual reports," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 57(2), pages 533-563, June.
    3. Charles H. Cho & Jonathan Maurice & Emmanuelle Nègre & Marie-Anne Verdier, 2016. "Is environmental disclosure good for the environment? A meta-analysis and research agenda," Post-Print halshs-01369422, HAL.
    4. Waris Ali & Zeeshan Mahmood & Jeffrey Wilson & Hina Ismail, 2024. "The impact of sustainability governance attributes on comprehensive CSR reporting: A developing country setting," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(3), pages 1802-1817, May.
    5. Mahoney, Lois S. & Thorne, Linda & Cecil, Lianna & LaGore, William, 2013. "A research note on standalone corporate social responsibility reports: Signaling or greenwashing?," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 24(4), pages 350-359.
    6. Samantha Miles, 2017. "Stakeholder Theory Classification: A Theoretical and Empirical Evaluation of Definitions," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 142(3), pages 437-459, May.
    7. Vitiana L'Abate & Filippo Vitolla & Paolo Esposito & Nicola Raimo, 2023. "The drivers of sustainability disclosure practices in the airport industry: A legitimacy theory perspective," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(4), pages 1903-1916, July.
    8. Teresa Eugénio & Isabel Costa Lourenço & Ana Isabel Morais, 2010. "Recent developments in social and environmental accounting research," Social Responsibility Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 6(2), pages 286-305, June.
    9. Habib Zaman Khan & Muhammad Nurul Houqe & Ielemia K Ielemia, 2023. "Organic versus cosmetic efforts of the quality of carbon reporting by top New Zealand firms. Does market reward or penalise?," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(1), pages 686-703, January.
    10. Ahmad Salman & Mastura Jaafar & Diana Mohamad & Mana Khoshkam, 2023. "Understanding Multi-stakeholder Complexity & Developing a Causal Recipe (fsQCA) for achieving Sustainable Ecotourism," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 25(9), pages 10261-10284, September.
    11. Zhang, Guanglong, 2023. "Regulatory-driven corporate greenwashing: Evidence from “low-carbon city” pilot policy in China," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    12. Ralph Adler & Mansi Mansi & Rakesh Pandey, 2022. "Accounting for waste management: a study of the reporting practices of the top listed Indian companies," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 62(2), pages 2401-2437, June.
    13. Warren Maroun, 2020. "A Conceptual Model for Understanding Corporate Social Responsibility Assurance Practice," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 161(1), pages 187-209, January.
    14. Francesco Gangi & Jérôme Méric & Rémi Jardat & Lucia Michela Daniele, 2019. "Business for society," Post-Print hal-02382307, HAL.
    15. Lite J. Nartey & Witold J. Henisz & Sinziana Dorobantu, 2023. "Reciprocity in Firm–Stakeholder Dialog: Timeliness, Valence, Richness, and Topicality," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 183(2), pages 429-451, March.
    16. Francesco Paolone & Fabrizio Granà & Laura Martiniello & Riccardo Tiscini, 2021. "Environmental risk indicators disclosure and value relevance: An empirical analysis of Italian listed companies after the implementation of the Legislative Decree 254/2016," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(5), pages 1471-1482, September.
    17. Liliana Hawrysz & Jolanta Maj, 2017. "Identification of Stakeholders of Public Interest Organisations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(9), pages 1-13, September.
    18. Wanli Li & Tiantian Yan & Yue Li & Ziqiao Yan, 2023. "Earnings management and CSR report tone: Evidence from China," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(4), pages 1883-1902, July.
    19. Fan, Hanlu & Tang, Qingliang & Pan, Lipeng, 2021. "An international study of carbon information asymmetry and independent carbon assurance," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 53(1).
    20. Junru Zhang & Hadrian Geri Djajadikerta & Zhaoyong Zhang, 2018. "Does Sustainability Engagement Affect Stock Return Volatility? Evidence from the Chinese Financial Market," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-21, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:9:p:3689-:d:1384976. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.