IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i9p3638-d1383678.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Diversified Filtering Mechanism for Evaluation Indicators of Urban Road Renewal Schemes

Author

Listed:
  • Juan Du

    (SILC Business School, Shanghai University, 20 Chengzhong Road, Jiading, Shanghai 201800, China)

  • Bing Liu

    (SILC Business School, Shanghai University, 20 Chengzhong Road, Jiading, Shanghai 201800, China)

  • Yimeng Wu

    (SILC Business School, Shanghai University, 20 Chengzhong Road, Jiading, Shanghai 201800, China)

  • Xiufang Li

    (Shanghai Tunnel Engineering Co., Ltd., 1099 Wanping South Road, Xuhui, Shanghai 200032, China)

  • Vijayan Sugumaran

    (School of Business Administration, Oakland University, Rochester, MI 48309, USA
    Center for Data Science and Big Data Analytics, Oakland University, Rochester, MI 48309, USA)

Abstract

As global urban infrastructure renewal progresses, the urgent need for sustainability-driven urban renewal intensifies amidst resource scarcity and environmental concerns. Effective evaluation and decision making regarding urban road renewal schemes are prerequisites for their successful implementation. However, variation in the prioritization of indicators in project evaluations and the poor adaptability of existing frameworks hinder the quick assessment of diverse projects. To address this issue, this paper proposes a scheme evaluation framework with embedded renewal project features comprising four modules. Following the initial construction of a sustainability-driven evaluation system, an indicator-filtering mechanism combining the Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA) model with a text similarity algorithm is developed. The Entropy Weight-–TOPSIS method is then employed to derive the final optimal decision based on selected indicators. Applying the decision framework to the G15 Jialiu Widening and Reconstruction Project in Shanghai, China, indicators are reduced by 48.3%, with the optimal scheme decision consistent with the traditional Entropy Weight–TOPSIS method. The framework is robust and enhances decision efficiency, filling theoretical gaps in existing indicator-filtering mechanisms.

Suggested Citation

  • Juan Du & Bing Liu & Yimeng Wu & Xiufang Li & Vijayan Sugumaran, 2024. "Diversified Filtering Mechanism for Evaluation Indicators of Urban Road Renewal Schemes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(9), pages 1-26, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:9:p:3638-:d:1383678
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/9/3638/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/9/3638/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Benseny, Jaume & Lahteenmaki, Jarno & Toyli, Juuso & Hammainen, Heikki, 2023. "Urban wireless traffic evolution: The role of new devices and the effect of policy," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 47(7).
    2. Jaume Benseny & Jarno Lahteenmaki & Juuso Toyli & Heikki Hammainen, 2023. "Urban wireless traffic evolution: the role of new devices and the effect of policy," Papers 2310.14406, arXiv.org.
    3. Lin, Sheng-Hau & Huang, Xianjin & Fu, Guole & Chen, Jia-Tsong & Zhao, Xiaofeng & Li, Jia-Hsuan & Tzeng, Gwo-Hshiung, 2021. "Evaluating the sustainability of urban renewal projects based on a model of hybrid multiple-attribute decision-making," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zehua Wang & Fachao Liang & Sheng-Hau Lin, 2023. "Can socially sustainable development be achieved through homestead withdrawal? A hybrid multiple-attributes decision analysis," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-18, December.
    2. Lin, Sheng-Wei & Lu, Wen-Min, 2024. "A comparison of chance-constrained data envelopment analysis, stochastic nonparametric envelopment of data and bootstrap method: A case study of cultural regeneration performance of cities," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 316(3), pages 1179-1191.
    3. Merve Koçak Güngör & Bülent Bostancı & Neşe Yılmaz Bakır & Umut Doğan, 2022. "Investigation of Urban Design Approaches in Renewal Areas with Hybrid Decision Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-21, August.
    4. Tingjun Li & Qingxiang Li, 2024. "Virtual Reality in Historic Urban District Renovation for Enhancing Social and Environmental Sustainability: A Case of Tangzixiang in Anhui," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-21, March.
    5. Chia-Li Lin, 2022. "Evaluating the urban sustainable development strategies and common suited paths considering various stakeholders," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(12), pages 14033-14073, December.
    6. Aleksandra Nowysz & Łukasz Mazur & Magdalena Daria Vaverková & Eugeniusz Koda & Jan Winkler, 2022. "Urban Agriculture as an Alternative Source of Food and Water Security in Today’s Sustainable Cities," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(23), pages 1-21, November.
    7. Yizhong Chen & Guiwen Liu & Taozhi Zhuang, 2022. "Evaluating the Comprehensive Benefit of Urban Renewal Projects on the Area Scale: An Integrated Method," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(1), pages 1-20, December.
    8. Junpai Chen & Yue Chen & Yitong Zhu & Mingyan Xiao & Hongfei Yang & Huaming Huang & Linli Li, 2023. "Assessing the Sustainability of Urban Community Renewal Projects in Southern China Based on a Hybrid MADM Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-33, February.
    9. Yunxi Bai & Shanshan Wu & Yunjie Zhang, 2023. "Exploring the Key Factors Influencing Sustainable Urban Renewal from the Perspective of Multiple Stakeholders," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-21, July.
    10. Lingyan Li & Jiaxin Zhu & Mimi Duan & Pingbo Li & Xiaotong Guo, 2022. "Overcoming the Collaboration Barriers among Stakeholders in Urban Renewal Based on a Two-Mode Social Network Analysis," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-23, October.
    11. Anita Kwartnik-Pruc & Grzegorz Ginda & Anna Trembecka, 2022. "Using the DEMATEL Method to Identify Impediments to the Process of Determining Compensation for Expropriated Properties," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-21, May.
    12. Doudou Liu & Liang Qiao & Chunlu Liu & Bin Liu & Shijing Liu, 2024. "Evaluation of Urban Quality Improvement Based on the MABAC Method and VIKOR Method: A Case Study of Shandong Province, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-18, April.
    13. Min Zhu & Wenbo Zhou & Min Hu & Juan Du & Tengfei Yuan, 2023. "Evaluating the Renewal Degree for Expressway Regeneration Projects Based on a Model Integrating the Fuzzy Delphi Method, the Fuzzy AHP Method, and the TOPSIS Method," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-27, February.
    14. Miglė Zabielaitė-Skirmantė & Marija Burinskienė & Vida Maliene, 2023. "Influence of Revitalization on the Social and Economic Well-Being of Residents: Case Study of Lithuania," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-25, April.
    15. Zheng, Wei-Quan & Cheung, Sze-Man & Zhu, Bo-Wei & Xiong, Lei & Tzeng, Gwo-Hshiung, 2024. "A hybrid multi-attribute decision-making model for the systematic evaluation of exoticism-themed retail spaces from the perspective of consumer experience," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    16. Felipe Teixeira Dias & Gisele Mazon & Priscila Cembranel & Robert Birch & José Baltazar Salgueirinho Osório de Andrade Guerra, 2022. "Land Use and Global Environmental Change: An Analytical Proposal Based on A Systematic Review," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-14, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:9:p:3638-:d:1383678. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.