IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i9p3608-d1382913.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Literature Review on the Paradoxes of Public Interest in Spatial Planning within Urban Settings with Diverse Stakeholders

Author

Listed:
  • Danai Machakaire

    (Department of Urban and Regional Planning, Faculty of Informatics and Design, Cape Peninsula University of Technology, Cape Town 8000, South Africa
    Author Danai Machakaire has died, the article is published posthumously.)

  • Masilonyane Mokhele

    (Department of Urban and Regional Planning, Faculty of Informatics and Design, Cape Peninsula University of Technology, Cape Town 8000, South Africa)

Abstract

The concept of public interest legitimises the planning profession, provides a foundational principle, and serves as an ethical norm for planners. However, critical discourses highlight the problems of the assumptions underlying the notion of public interest in spatial planning. Using an explorative literature review approach, the article aims to analyse various interpretations and applications of public interest in spatial planning. The literature search process, conducted between August and November 2023, targeted journal articles and books published in English and focused on the online databases of Academic Search Premier, Scopus, and Google Scholar. The final selected literature comprised 71 sources. The literature showed that diverse conceptualisations of public interest complicate the ways spatial planners and authorities incorporate it in planning tools, processes, and products. This article concludes by arguing that the prospects of achieving a single definition of the public interest concept are slim and may not be necessary given the heterogeneous conceptualisation and the multiple operational contexts of public interest. The article recommends the development of context-based analytical frameworks to establish linkages that would lead towards the equitable inclusion of public interest in spatial planning.

Suggested Citation

  • Danai Machakaire & Masilonyane Mokhele, 2024. "A Literature Review on the Paradoxes of Public Interest in Spatial Planning within Urban Settings with Diverse Stakeholders," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(9), pages 1-17, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:9:p:3608-:d:1382913
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/9/3608/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/9/3608/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Vanessa Watson, 2016. "Shifting Approaches to Planning Theory: Global North and South," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 1(4), pages 32-41.
    2. Laurence Côté-Roy & Sarah Moser, 2019. "‘Does Africa not deserve shiny new cities?’ The power of seductive rhetoric around new cities in Africa," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 56(12), pages 2391-2407, September.
    3. Sherif Zakhour & Jonathan Metzger, 2018. "Placing the Action in Context: Contrasting Public-centered and Institutional Understandings of Democratic Planning Politics," Planning Theory & Practice, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(3), pages 345-362, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tom Gillespie, 2020. "The Real Estate Frontier," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 44(4), pages 599-616, July.
    2. Philipp Horn & Diana Mitlin & Jhono Bennett & Beth Chitekwe-Biti & Jack Makau, 2018. "Towards citywide participatory planning: emerging community-led practices in three African cities," Global Development Institute Working Paper Series 342018, GDI, The University of Manchester.
    3. Mohammad Hamed Abdi & Ali Soltani, 2022. "Which Fabric/Scale Is Better for Transit-Oriented Urban Design: Case Studies in a Developing Country," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-22, June.
    4. Paula Meth & Tom Goodfellow & Alison Todes & Sarah Charlton, 2021. "Conceptualizing African Urban Peripheries," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 45(6), pages 985-1007, November.
    5. Shakirah Esmail Hudani, 2020. "The Green Masterplan: Crisis, State Transition and Urban Transformation in Post‐Genocide Rwanda," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 44(4), pages 673-690, July.
    6. Thinphanga, Pakamas & Friend, Richard, 2024. "Thailand’s policy vacuum: Land use planning as sites of negotiation and contestation," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 137(C).
    7. Croese, Sylvia & Robinson, Jennifer & Amedzro, Kofi Kekeli & Harrison, Philip & Kombe, Wilbard & Mwathunga, Evance & Owusu, George, 2023. "Persistent, pragmatic and prolific: Urban master planning in Accra, Dar es Salaam and Lilongwe," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 133(C).
    8. Frances Brill & Veronica Conte, 2020. "Understanding project mobility: The movement of King’s Cross to Brussels and Johannesburg," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 38(1), pages 79-96, February.
    9. Quintin Bradley, 2019. "Combined Authorities and material participation: The capacity of Green Belt to engage political publics in England," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 34(2), pages 181-195, March.
    10. Kassouri, Yacouba & Alola, Andrew Adewale, 2022. "Towards unlocking sustainable land consumption in sub-Saharan Africa: Analysing spatio-temporal variation of built-up land footprint and its determinants," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    11. Mikiko Terashima & Kate Clark, 2021. "The Precarious Absence of Disability Perspectives in Planning Research," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 6(1), pages 120-132.
    12. Stephanie Butcher, 2021. "DIFFERENTIATED CITIZENSHIP: The Everyday Politics of the Urban Poor in Kathmandu, Nepal," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 45(6), pages 948-963, November.
    13. Mennatullah Hendawy & Jörg Stollmann, 2020. "The Entanglement of Class, Marriage and Real Estate: The Visual Culture of Egypt’s Urbanisation," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 5(2), pages 44-58.
    14. Jorge Iván Rincón Córdoba & Nicolás Cabezas, 2020. "Ordenación del territorio, ciudad y derecho urbano : competencias, instrumentos de planificación y desafíos," Books, Universidad Externado de Colombia, Facultad de Derecho, number 1212, October.
    15. Jorn Koelemaij, 2022. "The world’s number 1 real estate development exporter? Assessing announced transnational projects from the United Arab Emirates between 2003–2014," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 54(2), pages 226-246, March.
    16. Mennatullah Hendawy & Jörg Stollmann, 2020. "The Entanglement of Class, Marriage and Real Estate: The Visual Culture of Egypt’s Urbanisation," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 5(2), pages 44-58.
    17. Sarah Moser & Nufar Avni, 2024. "Analysing a private city being built from scratch through a social and environmental justice framework: A research agenda," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 61(8), pages 1545-1562, June.
    18. Korah, Prosper Issahaku & Osborne, Natalie & Matthews, Tony, 2021. "Enclave urbanism in Ghana’s Greater Accra Region: Examining the socio-spatial consequences," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 111(C).
    19. Mohammed, Abubakar Sadiq & Abbas, Jannat & Dzimale, Augustine, 2023. "Navigating Land Acquisition Hurdles in Ghana’s Real Estate Development," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 7(12), pages 1084-1098, December.
    20. Taiyang Zhong & Zhenzhong Si & Steffanie Scott & Jonathan Crush & Kui Yang & Xianjin Huang, 2021. "Comprehensive Food System Planning for Urban Food Security in Nanjing, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-17, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:9:p:3608-:d:1382913. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.