IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i7p2804-d1365315.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Categorization of the Potential Impact of Italian Quarries on Water Resources through a Multi-Criteria Decision Aiding-Based Model

Author

Listed:
  • Matteo Paoletti

    (Department of Ecological and Biological Sciences, Tuscia University, 01100 Viterbo, Italy)

  • Vincenzo Piscopo

    (Department of Ecological and Biological Sciences, Tuscia University, 01100 Viterbo, Italy)

  • Chiara Sbarbati

    (Department of Ecological and Biological Sciences, Tuscia University, 01100 Viterbo, Italy)

  • Antonino Scarelli

    (Department of Ecological and Biological Sciences, Tuscia University, 01100 Viterbo, Italy)

Abstract

Quarrying has great importance for economic development and, at the same time, can have several adverse environmental impacts; specifically, it may have a significant influence on water resources. There are approximately 4000 quarries in Italy, and knowledge of their potential impact on water resources is limited. To this end, a procedure for categorizing Italian quarries was devised by combining the methods of Geographic Information Systems and Multi-Criteria Decision Aiding, selecting the potentially impactful criteria, and parametrizing the latter through the available databases. Using the ELECTRE models (ELECTRE TRI and ELECTRE III), the impact category of each quarry was assessed separately for surface water and groundwater and then the overall impact on water resources was assessed. The simulations were carried out by varying the weights of the various selected criteria, which allowed the grouping of Italian quarries into five categories with increasing potential impact on water resources. The ranking of quarries falling into the two highest-impact categories was further refined using ascending and descending distillations. The categorization can be interpreted as a first national assessment of the sustainability of quarrying activities with reference to water resources. The methodological approach of the study proved to be appropriate for the quarry-sorting and -ranking processes, lending itself to the introduction of other criteria and weights, including those arising from the participation of different stakeholders.

Suggested Citation

  • Matteo Paoletti & Vincenzo Piscopo & Chiara Sbarbati & Antonino Scarelli, 2024. "Categorization of the Potential Impact of Italian Quarries on Water Resources through a Multi-Criteria Decision Aiding-Based Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-18, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:7:p:2804-:d:1365315
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/7/2804/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/7/2804/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. G.K. Koulinas & O.E. Demesouka & P.K. Marhavilas & A.P. Vavatsikos & D.E. Koulouriotis, 2019. "Risk Assessment Using Fuzzy TOPSIS and PRAT for Sustainable Engineering Projects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-15, January.
    2. Vincenzo Piscopo & Chiara Sbarbati & Francesca Lotti & Luigi Lana & Marco Petitta, 2022. "Sustainability Indicators of Groundwater Withdrawal in a Heavily Stressed System: The Case of the Acque Albule Basin (Rome, Italy)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-22, November.
    3. Mancini, Lucia & Sala, Serenella, 2018. "Social impact assessment in the mining sector: Review and comparison of indicators frameworks," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 98-111.
    4. Shen, Shui-Long & Lin, Song-Shun & Zhou, Annan, 2023. "A cloud model-based approach for risk analysis of excavation system," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 231(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hesam Dehghani & Marc Bascompta & Ali Asghar Khajevandi & Kiana Afshar Farnia, 2023. "A Mimic Model Approach for Impact Assessment of Mining Activities on Sustainable Development Indicators," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-15, February.
    2. Cherepovitsyn, Alexey & Solovyova, Victoria & Dmitrieva, Diana, 2023. "New challenges for the sustainable development of the rare-earth metals sector in Russia: Transforming industrial policies," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    3. Van Assche, Kristof & Gruezmacher, Monica & Granzow, Michael, 2021. "From trauma to fantasy and policy. The past in the futures of mining communities; the case of Crowsnest Pass, Alberta," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    4. Paúl Carrión-Mero & Maribel Aguilar-Aguilar & Fernando Morante-Carballo & María José Domínguez-Cuesta & Cristhian Sánchez-Padilla & Andrés Sánchez-Zambrano & Josué Briones-Bitar & Roberto Blanco-Torre, 2021. "Surface and Underground Geomechanical Characterization of an Area Affected by Instability Phenomena in Zaruma Mining Zone (Ecuador)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-18, March.
    5. Christina G. Siontorou, 2023. "Fair Development Transition of Lignite Areas: Key Challenges and Sustainability Prospects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-14, August.
    6. S. Vögele & K. Govorukha & P. Mayer & I. Rhoden & D. Rübbelke & W. Kuckshinrichs, 2023. "Effects of a coal phase-out in Europe on reaching the UN Sustainable Development Goals," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 25(1), pages 879-916, January.
    7. Guzmán, Juan Ignacio & Karpunina, Alina & Araya, Constanza & Faúndez, Patricio & Bocchetto, Marcela & Camacho, Rodolfo & Desormeaux, Daniela & Galaz, Juanita & Garcés, Ingrid & Kracht, Willy & Lagos, , 2023. "Chile: On the road to global sustainable mining," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).
    8. Muhirwa, Fabien & Shen, Lei & Elshkaki, Ayman & Hirwa, Hubert & Umuziranenge, Gloriose & Velempini, Kgosietsile, 2023. "Linking large extractive industries to sustainable development of rural communities at mining sites in Africa: Challenges and pathways," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    9. Louisa Pollok & Sebastian Spierling & Hans-Josef Endres & Ulrike Grote, 2021. "Social Life Cycle Assessments: A Review on Past Development, Advances and Methodological Challenges," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-29, September.
    10. Sonja Kivinen & Kaarina Vartiainen & Timo Kumpula, 2018. "People and Post-Mining Environments: PPGIS Mapping of Landscape Values, Knowledge Needs, and Future Perspectives in Northern Finland," Land, MDPI, vol. 7(4), pages 1-23, December.
    11. Li, Yongbo & Barrueta Pinto, Mark Christhian & Kumar, D. Thresh, 2023. "Analyzing sustainability indicator for Chinese mining sector," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).
    12. Isacowitz, Jenna Jade & Schmeidl, Susanne & Tabelin, Carlito, 2022. "The operationalisation of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) in a mining context," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    13. Karl‐Heinz Gaudry & Danilo Ibarra & Carla Carabajo & Katty Marin, 2022. "Interdependencies between spatial planning and the mining laissez‐passer in cities: Policy analysis of the case of Ecuador," Regional Science Policy & Practice, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 14(2), pages 258-278, April.
    14. Claudia Di Noi & Andreas Ciroth, 2018. "Environmental and Social Pressures in Mining. Results from a Sustainability Hotspots Screening," Resources, MDPI, vol. 7(4), pages 1-21, December.
    15. Yıldız, Taşkın Deniz & Kural, Orhan, 2020. "The effects of the mining operation activities permit process on the mining sector in Turkey," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 69(C).
    16. Manuela D’Eusanio & Monica Serreli & Luigia Petti, 2019. "Social Life-Cycle Assessment of a Piece of Jewellery. Emphasis on the Local Community," Resources, MDPI, vol. 8(4), pages 1-14, September.
    17. Fernandez, Viviana, 2021. "Are extractive ventures more socio-environmentally committed?," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    18. V. L. Morgan & E. S. McLamore & M. Correll & G. A. Kiker, 2021. "Emerging mercury mitigation solutions for artisanal small-scale gold mining communities evaluated through a multicriteria decision analysis approach," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 41(3), pages 413-424, September.
    19. Paúl Carrión-Mero & Oscar Loor-Oporto & Héctor Andrade-Ríos & Gricelda Herrera-Franco & Fernando Morante-Carballo & María Jaya-Montalvo & Maribel Aguilar-Aguilar & Karen Torres-Peña & Edgar Berrezueta, 2020. "Quantitative and Qualitative Assessment of the “El Sexmo” Tourist Gold Mine (Zaruma, Ecuador) as A Geosite and Mining Site," Resources, MDPI, vol. 9(3), pages 1-22, March.
    20. Heydari, Mehrnoosh & Osanloo, Morteza & Başçetin, Ataç, 2023. "Developing a new social impact assessment model for deep open-pit mines," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:7:p:2804-:d:1365315. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.