IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i7p2787-d1365046.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Multi-Attribute Decision-Making Method in Preventive Maintenance of Asphalt Pavement Based on Optimized Triangular Fuzzy Number

Author

Listed:
  • Xunqian Xu

    (School of Transportation and Engineering, Nantong University, Nantong 226019, China)

  • Siwen Wang

    (School of Transportation and Engineering, Nantong University, Nantong 226019, China)

  • Fengyi Kang

    (Nantong Highway Development Center, Nantong 226007, China)

  • Shue Li

    (Nantong Highway Development Center, Nantong 226007, China)

  • Qi Li

    (School of Transportation and Engineering, Nantong University, Nantong 226019, China)

  • Tao Wu

    (School of Transportation and Engineering, Nantong University, Nantong 226019, China)

Abstract

By choosing the right pavement maintenance plan, we can reduce resource utilization, reduce environmental pollution, and extend road life, which is important for improving social sustainability. At present, the selection of road maintenance programs mostly adopts multiple attribute decision-making (MADA), in particular, the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) is often used. However, this method needs to use expert scoring data, which leads to strong subjectivity and poor reliability. Therefore, it reduces the science of road maintenance scheme selection. In order to reduce the subjectivity of the score and obtain a more suitable road maintenance scheme, this paper applies a multi-criteria decision-making method that characterizes attribute information by triangular fuzzy numbers (TFN) in the discrete decision space. Firstly, we invite experts to score the importance of the selection of pavement preventive maintenance technical solutions with respect to the indicators affecting the selection of solutions. Secondly, the two indicators of similarity and reliability are used to quantitatively evaluate the indicators and programs, respectively. Finally, we compare the weighted programs according to the overall possibility degree of each program. In actual cases, the overall possibility degree of each scheme obtained by this method is 1.0002–0.0477, and the optimal solution is fog sealing technology. The decision-making model applied in this paper can be considered in multiple dimensions, which can scientifically reduce the subjectivity of expert scoring. The best maintenance plan can also be quickly obtained through the simple calculation method in this paper.

Suggested Citation

  • Xunqian Xu & Siwen Wang & Fengyi Kang & Shue Li & Qi Li & Tao Wu, 2024. "Multi-Attribute Decision-Making Method in Preventive Maintenance of Asphalt Pavement Based on Optimized Triangular Fuzzy Number," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:7:p:2787-:d:1365046
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/7/2787/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/7/2787/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Saeid Jafarzadeh Ghoushchi & Elnaz Osgooei & Gholamreza Haseli & Hana Tomaskova, 2021. "A Novel Approach to Solve Fully Fuzzy Linear Programming Problems with Modified Triangular Fuzzy Numbers," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(22), pages 1-13, November.
    2. Asnake Adraro Angelo & Kotaro Sasai & Kiyoyuki Kaito, 2023. "Assessing Critical Road Sections: A Decision Matrix Approach Considering Safety and Pavement Condition," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-20, April.
    3. Rezaei, Jafar, 2015. "Best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 49-57.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Haseli, Gholamreza & Yaran Ögel, İlkin & Ecer, Fatih & Hajiaghaei-Keshteli, Mostafa, 2023. "Luxury in female technology (FemTech): Selection of smart jewelry for women through BCM-MARCOS group decision-making framework with fuzzy ZE-numbers," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 196(C).
    2. Alptekin Ulutaş & Ayşe Topal & Dragan Pamučar & Željko Stević & Darjan Karabašević & Gabrijela Popović, 2022. "A New Integrated Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Model for Sustainable Supplier Selection Based on a Novel Grey WISP and Grey BWM Methods," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-20, December.
    3. James J. H. Liou & Perry C. Y. Liu & Huai-Wei Lo, 2020. "A Failure Mode Assessment Model Based on Neutrosophic Logic for Switched-Mode Power Supply Risk Analysis," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(12), pages 1-19, December.
    4. Junnan Wu & Xin Liu & Dianqi Pan & Yichen Zhang & Jiquan Zhang & Kai Ke, 2023. "Research on Safety Evaluation of Municipal Sewage Treatment Plant Based on Improved Best-Worst Method and Fuzzy Comprehensive Method," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-15, May.
    5. Zarei, Esmaeil & Khan, Faisal & Abbassi, Rouzbeh, 2021. "Importance of human reliability in process operation: A critical analysis," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 211(C).
    6. Sarfaraz Hashemkhani Zolfani & Ramin Bazrafshan & Fatih Ecer & Çağlar Karamaşa, 2022. "The Suitability-Feasibility-Acceptability Strategy Integrated with Bayesian BWM-MARCOS Methods to Determine the Optimal Lithium Battery Plant Located in South America," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(14), pages 1-18, July.
    7. Paul, Ananna & Shukla, Nagesh & Trianni, Andrea, 2023. "Modelling supply chain sustainability challenges in the food processing sector amid the COVID-19 outbreak," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 87(PA).
    8. Liang, Fuqi & Brunelli, Matteo & Rezaei, Jafar, 2020. "Consistency issues in the best worst method: Measurements and thresholds," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).
    9. Pushparenu Bhattacharjee & Syed Abou Iltaf Hussain & V. Dey & U. K. Mandal, 2023. "Failure mode and effects analysis for submersible pump component using proportionate risk assessment model: a case study in the power plant of Agartala," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 14(5), pages 1778-1798, October.
    10. Dilupa Nakandala & Yung Po Tsang & Henry Lau & Carman Ka Man Lee, 2022. "An Industrial Blockchain-Based Multi-Criteria Decision Framework for Global Freight Management in Agricultural Supply Chains," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(19), pages 1-23, September.
    11. Zeng, Shouzhen & Zhou, Jiamin & Zhang, Chonghui & Merigó, José M., 2022. "Intuitionistic fuzzy social network hybrid MCDM model for an assessment of digital reforms of manufacturing industry in China," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
    12. Salimi, Negin & Rezaei, Jafar, 2018. "Evaluating firms’ R&D performance using best worst method," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 147-155.
    13. Željko Stević & Irena Đalić & Dragan Pamučar & Zdravko Nunić & Slavko Vesković & Marko Vasiljević & Ilija Tanackov, 2019. "A new hybrid model for quality assessment of scientific conferences based on Rough BWM and SERVQUAL," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 119(1), pages 1-30, April.
    14. Wu, Xingli & Liao, Huchang, 2021. "Modeling personalized cognition of customers in online shopping," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 104(C).
    15. Yuanxin Liu & FengYun Li & Yi Wang & Xinhua Yu & Jiahai Yuan & Yuwei Wang, 2018. "Assessing the Environmental Impact Caused by Power Grid Projects in High Altitude Areas Based on BWM and Vague Sets Techniques," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-20, May.
    16. Maghsoodi, Abtin Ijadi, 2023. "Cryptocurrency portfolio allocation using a novel hybrid and predictive big data decision support system," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 115(C).
    17. Kik, M.C. & Claassen, G.D.H. & Meuwissen, M.P.M. & Smit, A.B. & Saatkamp, H.W., 2021. "Actor analysis for sustainable soil management – A case study from the Netherlands," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 107(C).
    18. Ravindra Singh Saluja & Varinder Singh, 2023. "Attribute-based characterization, coding, and selection of joining processes using a novel MADM approach," OPSEARCH, Springer;Operational Research Society of India, vol. 60(2), pages 616-655, June.
    19. Huang, Beijia & Zhang, Long & Ma, Linmao & Bai, Wuliyasu & Ren, Jingzheng, 2021. "Multi-criteria decision analysis of China’s energy security from 2008 to 2017 based on Fuzzy BWM-DEA-AR model and Malmquist Productivity Index," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 228(C).
    20. Zheng Yuan & Baohua Wen & Cheng He & Jin Zhou & Zhonghua Zhou & Feng Xu, 2022. "Application of Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Analysis to Rural Spatial Sustainability Evaluation: A Systematic Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(11), pages 1-31, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:7:p:2787-:d:1365046. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.