IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i7p2611-d1361886.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Optimization of Non-Uniform Onshore Wind Farm Layout Using Modified Electric Charged Particles Optimization Algorithm Considering Different Terrain Characteristics

Author

Listed:
  • Taufal Hidayat

    (Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah 21589, Saudi Arabia)

  • Makbul A. M. Ramli

    (Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah 21589, Saudi Arabia)

  • Mohammed M. Alqahtani

    (Department of Industrial Engineering, King Khalid University, Abba 62529, Saudi Arabia)

Abstract

Designing an onshore wind farm layout poses several challenges, including the effects of terrain and landscape characteristics. An accurate model should be developed to obtain the optimal wind farm layout. This study introduces a novel metaheuristic algorithm called Modified Electric Charged Particles Optimization (MECPO) to maximize wind farms’ annual energy production ( AEP ) by considering the different terrain and landscape characteristics of the sites. Some non-uniform scenarios are applied to the optimization process to find the best combination of decision variables in the wind farm design. The study was initiated by a uniform wind farm layout optimization employing identical wind turbine hub heights and diameters. Following this, these parameters underwent further optimization based on some non-uniform scenarios, with the optimal layout from the initial uniform wind farm serving as the reference design. Three real onshore sites located in South Sulawesi, Indonesia, were selected to validate the performance of the proposed algorithm. The wind characteristics for each site were derived from WAsP CFD, accounting for the terrain and landscape effects. The results show that the non-uniform wind farm performs better than its uniform counterpart only when using varying hub heights. Considering the impacts of the terrain and landscape characteristics, it is observed that sites with a higher elevation, slope index, and roughness length exhibit a lower wake effect than those with lower ones. Moreover, the proposed algorithm, MECPO, consistently outperforms other algorithms, achieving the highest AEP across all simulations, with a 100% success rate in all eight instances. These results underscore the algorithm’s robustness and effectiveness in optimizing wind farm layouts, offering a promising avenue for advancing sustainable wind energy practices.

Suggested Citation

  • Taufal Hidayat & Makbul A. M. Ramli & Mohammed M. Alqahtani, 2024. "Optimization of Non-Uniform Onshore Wind Farm Layout Using Modified Electric Charged Particles Optimization Algorithm Considering Different Terrain Characteristics," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-28, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:7:p:2611-:d:1361886
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/7/2611/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/7/2611/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Feng, Ju & Shen, Wen Zhong, 2017. "Design optimization of offshore wind farms with multiple types of wind turbines," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 205(C), pages 1283-1297.
    2. González, Javier Serrano & Gonzalez Rodriguez, Angel G. & Mora, José Castro & Santos, Jesús Riquelme & Payan, Manuel Burgos, 2010. "Optimization of wind farm turbines layout using an evolutive algorithm," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(8), pages 1671-1681.
    3. Changshui, Zhang & Guangdong, Hou & Jun, Wang, 2011. "A fast algorithm based on the submodular property for optimization of wind turbine positioning," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(11), pages 2951-2958.
    4. Parada, Leandro & Herrera, Carlos & Flores, Paulo & Parada, Victor, 2017. "Wind farm layout optimization using a Gaussian-based wake model," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 531-541.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Azlan, F. & Kurnia, J.C. & Tan, B.T. & Ismadi, M.-Z., 2021. "Review on optimisation methods of wind farm array under three classical wind condition problems," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).
    2. Song, Mengxuan & Chen, Kai & Wang, Jun, 2020. "A two-level approach for three-dimensional micro-siting optimization of large-scale wind farms," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 190(C).
    3. Kyoungboo Yang & Kyungho Cho, 2019. "Simulated Annealing Algorithm for Wind Farm Layout Optimization: A Benchmark Study," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-15, November.
    4. Yang, Kyoungboo & Kwak, Gyeongil & Cho, Kyungho & Huh, Jongchul, 2019. "Wind farm layout optimization for wake effect uniformity," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 183(C), pages 983-995.
    5. Beşkirli, Mehmet & Koç, İsmail & Haklı, Hüseyin & Kodaz, Halife, 2018. "A new optimization algorithm for solving wind turbine placement problem: Binary artificial algae algorithm," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 301-308.
    6. Javier Serrano González & Manuel Burgos Payán & Jesús Manuel Riquelme Santos & Ángel Gaspar González Rodríguez, 2021. "Optimal Micro-Siting of Weathervaning Floating Wind Turbines," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-19, February.
    7. Dhunny, A.Z. & Timmons, D.S. & Allam, Z. & Lollchund, M.R. & Cunden, T.S.M., 2020. "An economic assessment of near-shore wind farm development using a weather research forecast-based genetic algorithm model," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 201(C).
    8. Hayat, Imran & Chatterjee, Tanmoy & Liu, Huiwen & Peet, Yulia T. & Chamorro, Leonardo P., 2019. "Exploring wind farms with alternating two- and three-bladed wind turbines," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 764-774.
    9. Cao, Jiu Fa & Zhu, Wei Jun & Shen, Wen Zhong & Sørensen, Jens Nørkær & Sun, Zhen Ye, 2020. "Optimizing wind energy conversion efficiency with respect to noise: A study on multi-criteria wind farm layout design," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 468-485.
    10. Sun, Haiying & Yang, Hongxing & Gao, Xiaoxia, 2019. "Investigation into spacing restriction and layout optimization of wind farm with multiple types of wind turbines," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 637-650.
    11. Nicolas Kirchner-Bossi & Fernando Porté-Agel, 2018. "Realistic Wind Farm Layout Optimization through Genetic Algorithms Using a Gaussian Wake Model," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-26, November.
    12. Serrano González, Javier & Burgos Payán, Manuel & Santos, Jesús Manuel Riquelme & González-Longatt, Francisco, 2014. "A review and recent developments in the optimal wind-turbine micro-siting problem," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 30(C), pages 133-144.
    13. Tao, Siyu & Xu, Qingshan & Feijóo, Andrés & Zheng, Gang & Zhou, Jiemin, 2020. "Nonuniform wind farm layout optimization: A state-of-the-art review," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 209(C).
    14. Zhang, Ziyu & Huang, Peng, 2023. "Prediction of multiple-wake velocity and wind power using a cosine-shaped wake model," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 219(P1).
    15. Ju, Xinglong & Liu, Feng, 2019. "Wind farm layout optimization using self-informed genetic algorithm with information guided exploitation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 248(C), pages 429-445.
    16. Dinçer, A.E. & Demir, A. & Yılmaz, K., 2024. "Multi-objective turbine allocation on a wind farm site," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 355(C).
    17. Dalibor Petković & Siti Ab Hamid & Žarko Ćojbašić & Nenad Pavlović, 2014. "Adapting project management method and ANFIS strategy for variables selection and analyzing wind turbine wake effect," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 74(2), pages 463-475, November.
    18. Yang, Xiaolei & Pakula, Maggie & Sotiropoulos, Fotis, 2018. "Large-eddy simulation of a utility-scale wind farm in complex terrain," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 229(C), pages 767-777.
    19. Ling, Ziyan & Zhao, Zhenzhou & Liu, Yige & Liu, Huiwen & Ali, Kashif & Liu, Yan & Wen, Yifan & Wang, Dingding & Li, Shijun & Su, Chunhao, 2024. "Multi-objective layout optimization for wind farms based on non-uniformly distributed turbulence and a new three-dimensional multiple wake model," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 227(C).
    20. Dinçer, A.Ersin & Demir, A. & Yılmaz, K., 2023. "Enhancing wind turbine site selection through a novel wake penalty criterion," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 283(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:7:p:2611-:d:1361886. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.