IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i6p2441-d1357510.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessing Environmental Sustainability of Phytoremediation to Remove Copper from Contaminated Soils

Author

Listed:
  • Juan J. Espada

    (Department of Chemical, Energy and Mechanical Technology, ESCET, Universidad Rey Juan Carlos, 28933 Móstoles, Madrid, Spain)

  • Rosalía Rodríguez

    (Department of Chemical, Energy and Mechanical Technology, ESCET, Universidad Rey Juan Carlos, 28933 Móstoles, Madrid, Spain)

  • Andrea Delgado

    (Department of Chemical, Energy and Mechanical Technology, ESCET, Universidad Rey Juan Carlos, 28933 Móstoles, Madrid, Spain)

  • Gemma Vicente

    (Department of Chemical, Energy and Mechanical Technology, ESCET, Universidad Rey Juan Carlos, 28933 Móstoles, Madrid, Spain
    Instituto de Investigación de Tecnologías para la Sostenibilidad, Universidad Rey Juan Carlos, 28933 Móstoles, Madrid, Spain)

  • Luis Fernando Bautista

    (Instituto de Investigación de Tecnologías para la Sostenibilidad, Universidad Rey Juan Carlos, 28933 Móstoles, Madrid, Spain
    Department of Chemical and Environmental Technology, ESCET, Universidad Rey Juan Carlos, 28933 Móstoles, Madrid, Spain)

Abstract

Phytoremediation stands out as a promising technology for removing heavy metals from contaminated soils. This work focuses on studying the environmental performance of phytoremediation in removing copper from contaminated soil located in an old Spanish mine using the life cycle assessment (LCA) method. For this purpose, Brassica juncea (brown mustard), Medicago sativa (alfalfa) and their rotary cultivation were assessed along with different options for managing biomass (landfill disposal and biomass cogeneration). In addition, soil excavation and soil washing treatments were also compared to phytoremediation. M. sativa proved superior to B. juncea and their rotary cultivation, regardless of the biomass disposal option, achieving impact reductions of 30–100%. This is due to the ability of M. sativa to fix nitrogen, which reduces fertiliser requirements. Among the biomass management alternatives, cogeneration was superior to landfill disposal in all cases by allowing for energy recovery, thereby reducing environmental impacts by 60–100%. M. sativa + cogeneration is the option that presents the best environmental performance of all the studied treatments, achieving reductions up to negligible values in four of eight impact categories due to the impacts avoided by energy production. On the contrary, soil excavation is the less desirable option, followed by soil washing treatment.

Suggested Citation

  • Juan J. Espada & Rosalía Rodríguez & Andrea Delgado & Gemma Vicente & Luis Fernando Bautista, 2024. "Assessing Environmental Sustainability of Phytoremediation to Remove Copper from Contaminated Soils," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-17, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:6:p:2441-:d:1357510
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/6/2441/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/6/2441/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wiem Sdiri & Huda S. AlSalem & Soha T. Al-Goul & Mona S. Binkadem & Hedi Ben Mansour, 2023. "Assessing the Effects of Treated Wastewater Irrigation on Soil Physico-Chemical Properties," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-12, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:6:p:2441-:d:1357510. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.