IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i6p2363-d1355883.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Differences in Carbon Intensity of Energy Consumption and Influential Factors between Yangtze River Economic Belt and Yellow River Basin

Author

Listed:
  • Qian Wang

    (Sichuan Academy of Social Sciences, Chengdu 610072, China)

  • Shiwei Chen

    (Sichuan Academy of Social Sciences, Chengdu 610072, China)

  • Tiantian Qu

    (Sichuan Academy of Social Sciences, Chengdu 610072, China)

Abstract

The Yangtze River Economic Belt and the Yellow River Basin are significant economic and ecological zones in China, contributing over 70% of the nation’s total carbon emissions, crucial for achieving “peak carbon” and “carbon neutrality” targets. This study examines data spanning 2000 to 2020 from 19 provinces, employing time-series analysis and the Theil index to compare carbon intensity variations in energy consumption between the regions. Findings reveal mean Theil index values of 0.0482 and 0.1699 for the Yangtze and Yellow River Basins, respectively. While the Yangtze River basin displays modest carbon intensity differences with remaining intra-basin disparities, the Yellow River Basin exhibits substantial discrepancies, attributed to both inter-basin and intra-basin factors. Our geodetector underscores the significance of government regulation, population size, and economic development in influencing carbon intensity within the Yangtze River Economic Belt, with impact coefficients exceeding 0.75 while carbon intensity in the Yellow River Basin is influenced by population size, energy consumption, and government regulation, with impact coefficients surpassing 0.8. Additionally, interactions among these factors significantly affect disparities in carbon intensity, suggesting a synergistic effect. We propose leveraging key factors from both basins to orchestrate emissions reduction efforts.

Suggested Citation

  • Qian Wang & Shiwei Chen & Tiantian Qu, 2024. "Differences in Carbon Intensity of Energy Consumption and Influential Factors between Yangtze River Economic Belt and Yellow River Basin," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-18, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:6:p:2363-:d:1355883
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/6/2363/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/6/2363/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. York, Richard & Rosa, Eugene A. & Dietz, Thomas, 2003. "STIRPAT, IPAT and ImPACT: analytic tools for unpacking the driving forces of environmental impacts," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 46(3), pages 351-365, October.
    2. Cheng, Zhonghua & Li, Lianshui & Liu, Jun, 2018. "Industrial structure, technical progress and carbon intensity in China's provinces," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 81(P2), pages 2935-2946.
    3. Liu, Jiaguo & Li, Sujuan & Ji, Qiang, 2021. "Regional differences and driving factors analysis of carbon emission intensity from transport sector in China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 224(C).
    4. Jiaxing Pang & Hengji Li & Chengpeng Lu & Chenyu Lu & Xingpeng Chen, 2020. "Regional Differences and Dynamic Evolution of Carbon Emission Intensity of Agriculture Production in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(20), pages 1-14, October.
    5. Fan, Ying & Liu, Lan-Cui & Wu, Gang & Tsai, Hsien-Tang & Wei, Yi-Ming, 2007. "Changes in carbon intensity in China: Empirical findings from 1980-2003," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 62(3-4), pages 683-691, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jincai Zhao & Qianqian Liu, 2021. "Examining the Driving Factors of Urban Residential Carbon Intensity Using the LMDI Method: Evidence from China’s County-Level Cities," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(8), pages 1-18, April.
    2. Kerong Jian & Ruyun Shi & Yixue Zhang & Zhigao Liao, 2023. "Research on Carbon Emission Characteristics and Differentiated Carbon Reduction Pathways in the Yangtze River Delta Region Based on the STIRPAT Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(21), pages 1-18, November.
    3. Benna Da & Yunhua Wu & Wuyuntana Bao, 2024. "Analysis of Spatial Distribution and Spillover Effects of Fertilizer Application Intensity in Inner Mongolia, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-23, May.
    4. Mingchen Yang & Lei Wang & Hang Hu, 2024. "Analysis of Factors Influencing the Spatial and Temporal Variability of Carbon Intensity in Western China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-19, April.
    5. Gao, Feng & He, Ziwen, 2024. "Digital economy, land resource misallocation and urban carbon emissions in Chinese resource-based cities," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    6. Shaojian Wang & Chuanglin Fang & Guangdong Li, 2015. "Spatiotemporal Characteristics, Determinants and Scenario Analysis of CO2 Emissions in China Using Provincial Panel Data," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(9), pages 1-23, September.
    7. Yuanyuan Gong & Deyong Song, 2015. "Life Cycle Building Carbon Emissions Assessment and Driving Factors Decomposition Analysis Based on LMDI—A Case Study of Wuhan City in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(12), pages 1-17, December.
    8. Shaozhou Qi & Huarong Peng & Xiujie Tan, 2019. "The Moderating Effect of R&D Investment on Income and Carbon Emissions in China: Direct and Spatial Spillover Insights," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-19, February.
    9. Zhang, Pan & Wang, Huan, 2022. "Do provincial energy policies and energy intensity targets help reduce CO2 emissions? Evidence from China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 245(C).
    10. Zhonghua Cheng & Xiai Shi, 2018. "Can Industrial Structural Adjustment Improve the Total-Factor Carbon Emission Performance in China?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-20, October.
    11. Miguel Rodríguez & Yolanda Pena-Boquete, 2013. "Mishandling carbon intensities," Working Papers 1302, Universidade de Vigo, Departamento de Economía Aplicada.
    12. Li, Huanan & Mu, Hailin & Zhang, Ming & Gui, Shusen, 2012. "Analysis of regional difference on impact factors of China’s energy – Related CO2 emissions," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 39(1), pages 319-326.
    13. Xianen Wang & Baoyang Qin & Hanning Wang & Xize Dong & Haiyan Duan, 2022. "Carbon Mitigation Pathways of Urban Transportation under Cold Climatic Conditions," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(8), pages 1-16, April.
    14. Chang, Chun-Ping & Dong, Minyi & Sui, Bo & Chu, Yin, 2019. "Driving forces of global carbon emissions: From time- and spatial-dynamic perspectives," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 70-80.
    15. Dong, Jia & Li, Cunbin, 2022. "Scenario prediction and decoupling analysis of carbon emission in Jiangsu Province, China," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 185(C).
    16. Shahiduzzaman, Md. & Layton, Allan, 2015. "Changes in CO2 emissions over business cycle recessions and expansions in the United States: A decomposition analysis," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 25-35.
    17. Claudia García-García & Catalina B. García-García & Román Salmerón, 2021. "Confronting collinearity in environmental regression models: evidence from world data," Statistical Methods & Applications, Springer;Società Italiana di Statistica, vol. 30(3), pages 895-926, September.
    18. Chen, Huadun & Du, Qianxi & Huo, Tengfei & Liu, Peiran & Cai, Weiguang & Liu, Bingsheng, 2023. "Spatiotemporal patterns and driving mechanism of carbon emissions in China's urban residential building sector," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 263(PE).
    19. Ren, Siyu & Hao, Yu & Xu, Lu & Wu, Haitao & Ba, Ning, 2021. "Digitalization and energy: How does internet development affect China's energy consumption?," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    20. Fan, Fei & Dai, Shangze & Yang, Bo & Ke, Haiqian, 2023. "Urban density, directed technological change, and carbon intensity: An empirical study based on Chinese cities," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:6:p:2363-:d:1355883. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.