IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i5p1915-d1346283.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Study on Spatial and Temporal Changes in Landscape Ecological Risks and Indicator Weights: A Case Study of the Bailong River Basin

Author

Listed:
  • Quanxi Li

    (College of Resources and Environment, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou 730070, China)

  • Biao Ma

    (College of Resources and Environment, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou 730070, China)

  • Liwei Zhao

    (College of Architecture, Southeast University, Nanjing 210096, China)

  • Zixuan Mao

    (College of Resources and Environment, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou 730070, China)

  • Xuelu Liu

    (College of Resources and Environment, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou 730070, China)

Abstract

The land use and ecological environment of the Bailong River Basin (BRB) have undergone significant changes in the context of developing urban–rural integration and ecological conservation in western China. As a key ecologically fragile area in the west region, a landscape ecological risk (LER) assessment can reflect the extent to which human activities and environmental changes threaten the ecosystems in the BRB. This study aims to explore the empowerment of indicator weights in an LER assessment. Landscape index weights and LER were analyzed based on land use data for three periods using objective and combined empowerment methods. It was found that the weighting results had apparent scale dependence, and the entropy weight method had the best results in indicator empowerment. From 2000–2020, the LER presented reduced risk, increased heterogeneity, and reduced aggregation. The shift from a medium-risk area to a lower-risk area was the primary transfer type of LER in the study area, and the LER showed a decreasing development trend. So far, research on weight empowerment in LER evaluations has been urgent. This study improved the landscape ecological risk assessment system by selecting an empowerment method that optimally takes into account scale dependence while providing valuable insights into the sustainability of the landscape in this watershed.

Suggested Citation

  • Quanxi Li & Biao Ma & Liwei Zhao & Zixuan Mao & Xuelu Liu, 2024. "Study on Spatial and Temporal Changes in Landscape Ecological Risks and Indicator Weights: A Case Study of the Bailong River Basin," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-25, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:5:p:1915-:d:1346283
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/5/1915/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/5/1915/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zhongfa Zhou & Weiquan Zhao & Sisi Lv & Denghong Huang & Zulun Zhao & Yaopeng Sun, 2023. "Spatiotemporal Transfer of Source-Sink Landscape Ecological Risk in a Karst Lake Watershed Based on Sub-Watersheds," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-19, July.
    2. Gibson, Clark C. & Ostrom, Elinor & Ahn, T. K., 2000. "The concept of scale and the human dimensions of global change: a survey," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 32(2), pages 217-239, February.
    3. Jian Peng & Minli Zong & Yi'na Hu & Yanxu Liu & Jiansheng Wu, 2015. "Assessing Landscape Ecological Risk in a Mining City: A Case Study in Liaoyuan City, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(7), pages 1-23, June.
    4. Hengrui Zhang & Jianing Zhang & Zhuozhuo Lv & Linjie Yao & Ning Zhang & Qing Zhang, 2023. "Spatio-Temporal Assessment of Landscape Ecological Risk and Associated Drivers: A Case Study of the Yellow River Basin in Inner Mongolia," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-15, May.
    5. Lei Zhao & Zhengtao Shi & Guangxiong He & Li He & Wenfei Xi & Qin Jiang, 2023. "Land Use Change and Landscape Ecological Risk Assessment Based on Terrain Gradients in Yuanmou Basin," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-19, September.
    6. Lihua Chen & Yuan Ma, 2023. "Ecological Risk Identification and Ecological Security Pattern Construction of Productive Wetland Landscape," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 37(12), pages 4709-4731, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ying Xia & Jia Li & Enhua Li & Jiajia Liu, 2023. "Analysis of the Spatial and Temporal Evolution and Driving Factors of Landscape Ecological Risk in the Four Lakes Basin on the Jianghan Plain, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-21, September.
    2. Xuebin Zhang & Jiale Yu & Haoyuan Feng & Litang Yao & Xuehong Li & Hucheng Du & Yanni Liu, 2024. "Landscape Ecological Risk and Drivers of Land-Use Transition under the Perspective of Differences in Topographic Gradient," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-20, June.
    3. Robert Costanza & Shuang Liu, 2014. "Ecosystem Services and Environmental Governance: Comparing China and the U.S," Asia and the Pacific Policy Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 1(1), pages 160-170, January.
    4. Grillitsch, Markus & Asheim, Björn & Fünfschilling, Lea & Kelmenson, Sophie & Lowe, Nichola & Lundquist, Karl Johan & Mahmoud, Yahia & Martynovich, Mikhail & Mattson, Pauline & Miörner, Johan & Nilsso, 2023. "Rescaling: An Analytical Lense to Study Economic and Industrial Shifts," Papers in Innovation Studies 2023/11, Lund University, CIRCLE - Centre for Innovation Research.
    5. Merrie, Andrew & Olsson, Per, 2014. "An innovation and agency perspective on the emergence and spread of Marine Spatial Planning," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 366-374.
    6. Steven M Manson, 2007. "Challenges in Evaluating Models of Geographic Complexity," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 34(2), pages 245-260, April.
    7. Jessica Cockburn, 2022. "Knowledge integration in transdisciplinary sustainability science: Tools from applied critical realism," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 30(2), pages 358-374, April.
    8. Reshma Shrestha & Jaap Zevenbergen & Fahria Masum & Mahesh Banskota, 2018. "“Action Space” Based Urban Land Governance Pattern: Implication in Managing Informal Settlements from the Perspective of Low-Income Housing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-19, June.
    9. Yoder, Landon & Roy Chowdhury, Rinku, 2018. "Tracing social capital: How stakeholder group interactions shape agricultural water quality restoration in the Florida Everglades," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 354-361.
    10. Vermaat, Jan E. & Eppink, Florian & van den Bergh, Jeroen C.J.M. & Barendregt, Aat & van Belle, Jasper, 2005. "Aggregation and the matching of scales in spatial economics and landscape ecology: empirical evidence and prospects for integration," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 52(2), pages 229-237, January.
    11. Weinmann, Bernd & Sheridan, Patrick & Schroers, Jan Ole & Kuhlmann, Friedrich, 2005. "Modelling the CAP Reform at the Regional Level with ProLand," 2005 International Congress, August 23-27, 2005, Copenhagen, Denmark 24508, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    12. Doll, Christopher N.H. & Muller, Jan-Peter & Morley, Jeremy G., 2006. "Mapping regional economic activity from night-time light satellite imagery," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 57(1), pages 75-92, April.
    13. Bazant-Fabre, Ondrej & Bonilla-Moheno, Martha & Martínez, M. Luisa & Lithgow, Debora & Muñoz-Piña, Carlos, 2022. "Land planning and protected areas in the coastal zone of Mexico: Do spatial policies promote fragmented governance?," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 121(C).
    14. Taylor M. Oshan & Levi J. Wolf & Mehak Sachdeva & Sarah Bardin & A. Stewart Fotheringham, 2022. "A scoping review on the multiplicity of scale in spatial analysis," Journal of Geographical Systems, Springer, vol. 24(3), pages 293-324, July.
    15. Syma Ebbin, 2012. "Fish and chips: cross-cutting issues and actors in a co-managed fishery regime in the Pacific Northwest," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 45(2), pages 169-191, June.
    16. Ayrapetyan, David & Hermans, Frans, 2020. "Introducing a multiscalar framework for biocluster research: A meta-analysis," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 12(9).
    17. Di Liu & Xiaoying Liang & Hai Chen & Hang Zhang & Nanzhao Mao, 2018. "A Quantitative Assessment of Comprehensive Ecological Risk for a Loess Erosion Gully: A Case Study of Dujiashi Gully, Northern Shaanxi Province, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-16, September.
    18. Franceschetti, Giorgio & Da Re, Riccardo & Secco, Laura, 2012. "Misurare la buona governance dei territori rurali: un possibile set di indicatori," 2012 First Congress, June 4-5, 2012, Trento, Italy 124105, Italian Association of Agricultural and Applied Economics (AIEAA).
    19. Juerges, Nataly & Leahy, Jessica & Newig, Jens, 2020. "A typology of actors and their strategies in multi-scale governance of wind turbine conflict within forests," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).
    20. Kissinger, Meidad & Rees, William E., 2010. "An interregional ecological approach for modelling sustainability in a globalizing world—Reviewing existing approaches and emerging directions," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 221(21), pages 2615-2623.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:5:p:1915-:d:1346283. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.