IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i5p1842-d1344519.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Articulating Organic Agriculture and Sustainable Development Goals: Serbia Case Study

Author

Listed:
  • Srdjan Šeremešić

    (Faculty of Agriculture, University of Novi Sad, Sq Dositeja Obradovića 8, 21000 Novi Sad, Serbia)

  • Željko Dolijanović

    (Faculty of Agriculture, University of Belgrade, Nemanjina 6, 11080 Belgrade, Serbia)

  • Mirela Tomaš Simin

    (Faculty of Agriculture, University of Novi Sad, Sq Dositeja Obradovića 8, 21000 Novi Sad, Serbia)

  • Marija Milašinović Šeremešić

    (Institute of Food Technology Novi Sad, University of Novi Sad, Boulevard, Cara Lazara 1, 21000 Novi Sad, Serbia)

  • Bojan Vojnov

    (Faculty of Agriculture, University of Novi Sad, Sq Dositeja Obradovića 8, 21000 Novi Sad, Serbia)

  • Tatjana Brankov

    (Faculty of Economics Subotica, University of Novi Sad, Segedinski Put 9-11, 24000 Subotica, Serbia)

  • Miloš Rajković

    (Institute for Medicinal Plants Research “Dr. Josif Pančić”, Tadeuša Koščuška 1, 11000 Beograd, Serbia
    Faculty of Ecological Agriculture, University Educons, Vojvode Putnika 87, 21208 Sremska Kamenica, Serbia)

Abstract

With the greening of agriculture, there is a need to better link the sustainable development goals (SDGs) and organic agriculture in developing countries. However, in Serbia, there is a huge gap between the potential of their implementation and the actual situation. This paper assessed the strengths and weaknesses of SDGs and organic agriculture in Serbia and how their relationship can contribute in the development of sustainable agriculture. Key data and indicators of the economic, agricultural and social development of Serbia from international and national databases, as well as recent publications related to the selected topic, were assesed. The results showed that the restricted development of organic agriculture in Serbia stems from the undeveloped awareness of consumers, slower acceptance of alternative agricultural systems and the volatility of mainstream conventional agricultural production. The integration of organic agriculture into the largest conceptual and strategic frameworks, such as the SDGs, can offer a true transformation of local food systems and could result in positive feedback to the environment and society. In the long term, the SDGs framework can help connect various dimensions of sustainable agriculture, stakeholders and policymakers. The future focus should be on how to create entry points for agricultural transformation based on certified organic methodologies and how to integrate agricultural heritage into the realisation of SDGs.

Suggested Citation

  • Srdjan Šeremešić & Željko Dolijanović & Mirela Tomaš Simin & Marija Milašinović Šeremešić & Bojan Vojnov & Tatjana Brankov & Miloš Rajković, 2024. "Articulating Organic Agriculture and Sustainable Development Goals: Serbia Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-15, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:5:p:1842-:d:1344519
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/5/1842/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/5/1842/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jules René Minkoua Nzié & Ateh Thomson Pepeah, 2022. "Are natural resources an impetus for economic growth in Africa?," Natural Resources Forum, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 46(1), pages 136-153, February.
    2. Jelena Vapa Tankosić & Radivoj Prodanović & Vladimir Medović, 2023. "Analysis of Agri-Environmental Management Practices and Their Implementation in the Agricultural Policies of the Republic of Serbia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-24, August.
    3. Christopher B. Barrett, 2021. "Overcoming Global Food Security Challenges through Science and Solidarity," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 103(2), pages 422-447, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Li, Shanshan & Long, Fang & Long, Litao, 2022. "Resources curse and sustainable development revisited: Evaluating the role of remittances for China," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    2. Chichaibelu, Bezawit Beyene & Bekchanov, Maksud & von Braun, Joachim & Torero, Maximo, 2021. "The global cost of reaching a world without hunger: Investment costs and policy action opportunities," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 104(C).
    3. Petru Alexandru Vlaicu & Arabela Elena Untea & Alexandra Gabriela Oancea, 2024. "Sustainable Poultry Feeding Strategies for Achieving Zero Hunger and Enhancing Food Quality," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-57, October.
    4. Destek, Mehmet Akif & Adedoyin, Festus & Bekun, Festus Victor & Aydin, Sercan, 2023. "Converting a resource curse into a resource blessing: The function of institutional quality with different dimensions," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).
    5. Shengmiao Han & Badrul Hisham Bin Kamaruddin & Xing Shi, 2025. "The Intertwined Threads of Blue Economy, Inclusive Growth, and Environmental Sustainability in Transition Economies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(3), pages 1-24, January.
    6. Xie, Chengyuan & Jin, Xiaotong, 2023. "The role of digitalization, sustainable environment, natural resources and political globalization towards economic well-being in China, Japan and South Korea," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).
    7. Jayjit Roy & Manan Roy & Jessica Robinson, 2024. "Agricultural Trade and Food Security," Working Papers 24-18, Department of Economics, Appalachian State University.
    8. Na Xu & Liqin Zhang & Xiyuan Leng, 2022. "Sustainable Food Production from a Labor Supply Perspective: Policies and Implications," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-19, November.
    9. Wysel, Matthew & Baker, Derek & Billingsley, William, 2021. "Data sharing platforms: How value is created from agricultural data," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    10. Shreesha Pandeya & Buddhi R. Gyawali & Suraj Upadhaya, 2025. "Factors Influencing Precision Agriculture Technology Adoption Among Small-Scale Farmers in Kentucky and Their Implications for Policy and Practice," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-17, January.
    11. Cattaneo, Andrea & Sadiddin, Ahmad & Vaz, Sara & Conti, Valentina & Holleman, Cindy & Sánchez, Marco V. & Torero, Máximo, 2023. "Viewpoint: Ensuring affordability of diets in the face of shocks," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 117(C).
    12. Kirtan Dave & Anand Kumar & Nischal Dave & Mukul Jain & Parmdeep Singh Dhanda & Alpa Yadav & Prashant Kaushik, 2024. "Climate Change Impacts on Legume Physiology and Ecosystem Dynamics: A Multifaceted Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(14), pages 1-25, July.
    13. Miguel I. Gómez & Deishin Lee, 2023. "Transforming food supply chains for sustainability," Journal of Supply Chain Management, Institute for Supply Management, vol. 59(4), pages 79-92, October.
    14. Md Roushon Jamal & Paul Kristiansen & Md Jahangir Kabir & Lisa Lobry de Bruyn, 2023. "Challenges and Adaptations for Resilient Rice Production under Changing Environments in Bangladesh," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-21, June.
    15. Mohamed M. Hassona & Hala A. Abd El-Aal & Nahla M. Morsy & Ahmed M. S. Hussein, 2024. "Abiotic and Biotic Factors Affecting Crop Growth and Productivity: Unique Buckwheat Production in Egypt," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-20, August.
    16. Mehrabi, Zia, 2022. "Likely decline in the number of farms globally by the middle of the century," SocArXiv m6p5u_v1, Center for Open Science.
    17. Stemmler, Henry & Meemken, Eva-Marie, 2023. "Greenhouse farming and employment: Evidence from Ecuador," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 117(C).
    18. Kevin N. Metuge & Betrand A. Tambe & Fabrice Tonfack Djikeng & Aduni Ufuan Achidi & Given Chipili & Xikombiso G. Mbhenyane, 2025. "Nutritional Vulnerability of Displaced Persons: A Study of Food Security and Access in Kumba Municipality, Cameroon," Challenges, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-19, January.
    19. Jonathon Siegle & Gregory Astill & Zoë Plakias & Daniel Tregeagle, 2024. "Estimating perennial crop supply response: A methodology literature review," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 55(2), pages 159-180, March.
    20. Addis Yimer, 2023. "When does FDI make a difference for growth? A comparative analysis of resource‐rich and resource‐scarce African economies," International Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 26(1), pages 82-110, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:5:p:1842-:d:1344519. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.