IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v14y2024i10p1811-d1498603.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sustainable Poultry Feeding Strategies for Achieving Zero Hunger and Enhancing Food Quality

Author

Listed:
  • Petru Alexandru Vlaicu

    (Feed and Food Quality Department, National Research and Development Institute for Animal Biology and Nutrition, 077015 Ilfov, Romania)

  • Arabela Elena Untea

    (Feed and Food Quality Department, National Research and Development Institute for Animal Biology and Nutrition, 077015 Ilfov, Romania)

  • Alexandra Gabriela Oancea

    (Feed and Food Quality Department, National Research and Development Institute for Animal Biology and Nutrition, 077015 Ilfov, Romania)

Abstract

As global demand increases for poultry products, innovative feeding strategies that reduce resource efficiency and improve food safety are urgently needed. This paper explores the potential of alternative sustainable poultry feeding strategies aimed at achieving SDG2 (Zero Hunger) while increasing production performance and food quality, focusing on the potential recycling of by-products, plants, and food waste derived from fruits, vegetables, and seeds, which account for up to 35% annually. The paper provides a review analysis of the nutritional (protein, fat, fiber, and ash) and minerals (i.e., calcium, phosphorus, zinc, manganese, copper, and iron) content as well as the bioactive compounds (polyphenols, antioxidants, carotenoids, fatty acids, and vitamins) of alternative feed ingredients, which can contribute to resource efficiency, reduce dependency on conventional feeds, and lower production costs by 25%. The nutritional benefits of these alternative feed ingredients, including their effects on poultry production and health, and their potential for improving poultry product quality, are presented. Carrot, paprika, rosehip, and some berry waste represent a great source of carotenoids, polyphenols, and vitamins, while the seed meals (flax, rapeseed, and sea buckthorn) have been reported to enhance the essential fatty acid composition in eggs and meat. Numerous plants (basil, sage, rosemary, and lettuce) are natural reservoirs of bioactive compounds with benefits for both animal and food products. Some challenges in implementing these alternative sustainable feeding strategies, including inconsistencies in quality and availability, the presence of anti-nutrients, and regulatory barriers, are also explored. In conclusion, future research directions in sustainable poultry feeding with alternative feed ingredients should be considered to achieve SDG2.

Suggested Citation

  • Petru Alexandru Vlaicu & Arabela Elena Untea & Alexandra Gabriela Oancea, 2024. "Sustainable Poultry Feeding Strategies for Achieving Zero Hunger and Enhancing Food Quality," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-57, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:14:y:2024:i:10:p:1811-:d:1498603
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/14/10/1811/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/14/10/1811/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Khoshnevisan, Benyamin & Duan, Na & Tsapekos, Panagiotis & Awasthi, Mukesh Kumar & Liu, Zhidan & Mohammadi, Ali & Angelidaki, Irini & Tsang, Daniel CW. & Zhang, Zengqiang & Pan, Junting & Ma, Lin & Ag, 2021. "A critical review on livestock manure biorefinery technologies: Sustainability, challenges, and future perspectives," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).
    2. Qurat Ul Ain Sajid & Muhammad Umair Asghar & Haneef Tariq & Martyna Wilk & Arkadiusz Płatek, 2023. "Insect Meal as an Alternative to Protein Concentrates in Poultry Nutrition with Future Perspectives (An Updated Review)," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-17, June.
    3. Petru Alexandru Vlaicu & Arabela Elena Untea & Raluca Paula Turcu & Mihaela Saracila & Iulia Varzaru & Alexandra Gabriela Oancea, 2023. "Chemical composition of dietary alfalfa and its effectiveness on broiler chicken thigh meat quality," Czech Journal of Food Sciences, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 41(4), pages 279-286.
    4. Christopher B. Barrett, 2021. "Overcoming Global Food Security Challenges through Science and Solidarity," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 103(2), pages 422-447, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Petru Alexandru Vlaicu & Arabela Elena Untea, 2024. "Feeding Strategies and Quality Assessments of Animal-Derived Products," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-5, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rahul Kadam & Sangyeol Jo & Jonghwa Lee & Kamonwan Khanthong & Heewon Jang & Jungyu Park, 2024. "A Review on the Anaerobic Co-Digestion of Livestock Manures in the Context of Sustainable Waste Management," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(3), pages 1-27, January.
    2. Costantini, Michele & Provolo, Giorgio & Bacenetti, Jacopo, 2024. "The effects of incorporating renewable energy into the environmental footprint of beef production," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 289(C).
    3. Maria Salud Camilleri-Rumbau & Kelly Briceño & Lene Fjerbæk Søtoft & Knud Villy Christensen & Maria Cinta Roda-Serrat & Massimiliano Errico & Birgir Norddahl, 2021. "Treatment of Manure and Digestate Liquid Fractions Using Membranes: Opportunities and Challenges," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(6), pages 1-30, March.
    4. Zhe Zhao & Xiangzheng Deng & Fan Zhang & Zhihui Li & Wenjiao Shi & Zhigang Sun & Xuezhen Zhang, 2022. "Scenario Analysis of Livestock Carrying Capacity Risk in Farmland from the Perspective of Planting and Breeding Balance in Northeast China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-13, March.
    5. Yung-Cheng Chang & Yen-Ju Pan & Tzu-Hsuan Huang & Ting-Hsun Hsiao & Liang-Yu Wei & Te-Hua Hsu, 2023. "Cultivation of Brackish Water Microalgae for Pig Manure Liquid Digestate Recycling," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(23), pages 1-14, November.
    6. Jayjit Roy & Manan Roy & Jessica Robinson, 2024. "Agricultural Trade and Food Security," Working Papers 24-18, Department of Economics, Appalachian State University.
    7. Zeng, Yangmei & He, Ke & Zhang, Junbiao & Li, Ping, 2023. "Adoption and ex-post impacts of sustainable manure management practices on income and happiness: Evidence from swine breeding farmers in rural Hubei, China," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 208(C).
    8. Florian Grassauer & Jannatul Ferdous & Nathan Pelletier, 2023. "Manure Valorization Using Black Soldier Fly Larvae: A Review of Current Systems, Production Characteristics, Utilized Feed Substrates, and Bioconversion and Nitrogen Conversion Efficiencies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-20, August.
    9. Akhilesh Kumar Singh & Priti Pal & Saurabh Singh Rathore & Uttam Kumar Sahoo & Prakash Kumar Sarangi & Piotr Prus & Paweł Dziekański, 2023. "Sustainable Utilization of Biowaste Resources for Biogas Production to Meet Rural Bioenergy Requirements," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(14), pages 1-22, July.
    10. Miguel I. Gómez & Deishin Lee, 2023. "Transforming food supply chains for sustainability," Journal of Supply Chain Management, Institute for Supply Management, vol. 59(4), pages 79-92, October.
    11. Kumar, A. Naresh & Dissanayake, Pavani Dulanja & Masek, Ondrej & Priya, Anshu & Ki Lin, Carol Sze & Ok, Yong Sik & Kim, Sang-Hyoun, 2021. "Recent trends in biochar integration with anaerobic fermentation: Win-win strategies in a closed-loop," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 149(C).
    12. Md Roushon Jamal & Paul Kristiansen & Md Jahangir Kabir & Lisa Lobry de Bruyn, 2023. "Challenges and Adaptations for Resilient Rice Production under Changing Environments in Bangladesh," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-21, June.
    13. Yaashikaa, P.R. & Kumar, P. Senthil, 2022. "Valorization of agro-industrial wastes for biorefinery process and circular bioeconomy: A critical review," MPRA Paper 112234, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    14. Richard Ochieng & Alemayehu Gebremedhin & Shiplu Sarker, 2022. "Integration of Waste to Bioenergy Conversion Systems: A Critical Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-22, April.
    15. Mohamed M. Hassona & Hala A. Abd El-Aal & Nahla M. Morsy & Ahmed M. S. Hussein, 2024. "Abiotic and Biotic Factors Affecting Crop Growth and Productivity: Unique Buckwheat Production in Egypt," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-20, August.
    16. Néméhie Lawson & Merlin Alvarado-Morales & Panagiotis Tsapekos & Irini Angelidaki, 2021. "Techno-Economic Assessment of Biological Biogas Upgrading Based on Danish Biogas Plants," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-18, December.
    17. Jiaxin Lu & Atif Muhmood & Panagiotis Tsapekos & Xian Cui & Yuwen Guo & Yi Zheng & Yizhan Qiu & Pan Wang & Lianhai Ren, 2022. "Untargeted Metabolomics Profiling of Bioactive Compounds under Varying Digestate Storage Conditions: Assessment of Antioxidant and Antifungal Activity," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(8), pages 1-17, April.
    18. Bi, Shaojie & Wang, Chunshuang & Wang, Haipeng & Du, Yanli & Yu, Xinhui & Wang, Yanjie, 2024. "Comparison of mesophilic and thermophilic anaerobic digestion of food waste: Focusing on methanogenic performance and pathogens removal," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 233(C).
    19. Marcin Zieliński & Joanna Kazimierowicz & Marcin Dębowski, 2022. "Advantages and Limitations of Anaerobic Wastewater Treatment—Technological Basics, Development Directions, and Technological Innovations," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-39, December.
    20. G. Venkatesh, 2022. "Circular Bio-economy—Paradigm for the Future: Systematic Review of Scientific Journal Publications from 2015 to 2021," Circular Economy and Sustainability, Springer, vol. 2(1), pages 231-279, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:14:y:2024:i:10:p:1811-:d:1498603. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.