IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i5p1830-d1344415.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Impact of Group- and Single-Tree-Selection Cuttings on Runoff and Sediment Yield in Mixed Broadleaved Forests, Northern Iran

Author

Listed:
  • Hassan Samdaliri

    (Department of Forestry and Forest Economics, Faculty of Natural Resources, University of Tehran, Karaj 14176-43184, Iran)

  • Meghdad Jourgholami

    (Department of Forestry and Forest Economics, Faculty of Natural Resources, University of Tehran, Karaj 14176-43184, Iran)

  • Ali Salajegheh

    (Department of Arid and Mountainous Regions Reclamation, Faculty of Natural Resources, University of Tehran, Karaj 31587-77871, Iran)

  • Hadi Sohrabi

    (Department of Forestry and Forest Economics, Faculty of Natural Resources, University of Tehran, Karaj 14176-43184, Iran)

  • Rachele Venanzi

    (Department of Agricultural and Forest Sciences, Tuscia University, 01100 Viterbo, Italy)

  • Rodolfo Picchio

    (Department of Agricultural and Forest Sciences, Tuscia University, 01100 Viterbo, Italy)

  • Angela Lo Monaco

    (Department of Agricultural and Forest Sciences, Tuscia University, 01100 Viterbo, Italy)

Abstract

Silvicultural treatment and the forest harvesting operations using different methods can lead to an increase in the production of runoff and sediment by changing the canopy and soil surface where they are conducted. In order to investigate this issue, sampling plots were established in the Namkhaneh district of the Kheyrud forest with three replications for every treatment: control stand and tree harvesting systems using single-selection cuttings and group-selection cuttings. The amount of runoff and sediment was collected and estimated from precipitation over a period of one year. Also, some soil physical properties such as bulk density, penetration resistance, sand, silt, and clay content, soil moisture, and soil organic matter were measured. The results showed that tree harvesting systems has a significant effect on runoff, the runoff coefficient, and sediment but the season (growing season and fall) and the combined effect of tree harvesting systems and the season have no significant effect on the runoff coefficient and sediment. The mean runoffs of each rainfall event for the control, single-tree, and group-selection treatments were 5.67, 8.42, and 10.28 mm, respectively, and the sediment amounts were 3.42, 6.70, and 11.82 gr/m 2 , respectively. Furthermore, the total annual erosion amounts of the control, selection, and grouping treatments were 0.427, 0.838, and 2.178 t/ha, respectively. The bulk density, penetration resistance, and percentage of sand and silt were positively related and the percentages of clay and organic matter were negatively related with the amount of runoff and sediment. In the method of individual selection cuttings, the damage to the forest in terms of the amount of runoff and soil erosion was less than for the group-selection cuttings. Forest harvesting by the selection method (single-selection and group-selection) has caused different changes in the vegetation canopy. The final summary of our results could be the advice to predominantly use the single-selection method in high-slope stands.

Suggested Citation

  • Hassan Samdaliri & Meghdad Jourgholami & Ali Salajegheh & Hadi Sohrabi & Rachele Venanzi & Rodolfo Picchio & Angela Lo Monaco, 2024. "The Impact of Group- and Single-Tree-Selection Cuttings on Runoff and Sediment Yield in Mixed Broadleaved Forests, Northern Iran," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-13, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:5:p:1830-:d:1344415
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/5/1830/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/5/1830/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. M. Akbarimehr & R. Naghdi, 2012. "Assessing the relationship of slope and runoff volume on skid trails (Case study: Nav 3 district)," Journal of Forest Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 58(8), pages 357-362.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:5:p:1830-:d:1344415. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.