IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i4p1649-d1340209.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How Realistic Are Coal Phase-Out Timeline Targets for Turkey?

Author

Listed:
  • Sirri Uyanik

    (Faculty of Economics and Management, KTO Karatay University, 42020 Konya, Turkey)

  • Ozlem Dogerlioglu Isiksungur

    (Faculty of Law, Izmir University of Economics, 35330 Izmir, Turkey)

Abstract

Coal phase-out is considered to be critical to the success of energy transition for all countries. Yet, recent assessments indicate that energy security aspects may affect phase-out plans and/or commitments and jeopardize energy transition ambitions. This study aims to question to what extent coal phase-out targets for Türkiye are realistic. Although previous research has mainly focused on direct emission reduction targets and just transition aspects, we include a down-to-earth discussion of the potential challenges before coal phase-out. The interaction between phasing-out coal power generation and energy security aspects is also analyzed. To understand the coal phase-out timeline targets, its limitations, and constraints within the framework of future power projections, a supply–demand model with different scenarios was developed. In addition, energy storage was also discussed as an option. Analysis revealed that energy storage, in the short- and medium-term, may not be the panacea, as it may not be deployed in the scale to substitute the energy security that coal provided. Moreover, our findings indicate that phasing-out is not as simple as assumed. A target timeline is certainly not realistic considering the energy security aspect and challenges. On the other hand, economically nonviable and technically nonavailable coal-fired power plants in the power system may retire gradually (as a natural phase-out process). This may occur even without waiting for the target timeline, if there would ever officially be one.

Suggested Citation

  • Sirri Uyanik & Ozlem Dogerlioglu Isiksungur, 2024. "How Realistic Are Coal Phase-Out Timeline Targets for Turkey?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-20, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:4:p:1649-:d:1340209
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/4/1649/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/4/1649/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tamara Antonia Krawchenko & Megan Gordon, 2021. "How Do We Manage a Just Transition? A Comparative Review of National and Regional Just Transition Initiatives," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-16, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Christina G. Siontorou, 2023. "Fair Development Transition of Lignite Areas: Key Challenges and Sustainability Prospects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-14, August.
    2. Winkler, Hernan, 2021. "When Coal Leaves Town: Can Local Governments Help?," MPRA Paper 112587, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    3. Kengo Suzuki & Ryohei Ishiwata, 2022. "Impact of a Carbon Tax on Energy Transition in a Deregulated Market: A Game-Based Experimental Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-19, October.
    4. Ahmed M. E. Khalil & Anne P. M. Velenturf & Masoud Ahmadinia & Shaowei Zhang, 2023. "Context Analysis for Transformative Change in the Ceramic Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-25, August.
    5. Caroline Boules & Yuki Kato, 2023. "Just Transition or Just Transitioning? Potentials and Limitations of Urban Growers’ Adaptations to the Impacts of the COVID-19 Pandemic," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-19, June.
    6. Pradip Swarnakar & Mudit Kumar Singh, 2022. "Local Governance in Just Energy Transition: Towards a Community-Centric Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-21, May.
    7. Gunton, Richard M. & Hejnowicz, Adam P. & Basden, Andrew & van Asperen, Eline N. & Christie, Ian & Hanson, David R. & Hartley, Sue E., 2022. "Valuing beyond economics: A pluralistic evaluation framework for participatory policymaking," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 196(C).
    8. Tamara Antonia Krawchenko & Megan Gordon, 2022. "Just Transitions for Oil and Gas Regions and the Role of Regional Development Policies," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-14, July.
    9. Ezio Micelli & Giulia Giliberto & Eleonora Righetto & Greta Tafuri, 2024. "Urban Disparities in Energy Performance Premium Prices: Towards an Unjust Transition?," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-21, February.
    10. Muscillo, Alessio & Re, Simona & Gambacorta, Sergio & Ferrara, Giuseppe & Tagliafierro, Nicola & Borello, Emiliano & Rubino, Alessandro & Facchini, Angelo, 2023. "An open data index to assess the green transition - A study on all Italian municipalities," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 212(C).
    11. Florina Pinzaru & Alina Mihaela Dima & Alexandra Zbuchea & Zoltan Veres, 2022. "Adopting Sustainability and Digital Transformation in Business in Romania: A Multifaceted Approach in the Context of the Just Transition," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 24(59), pages 1-28.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:4:p:1649-:d:1340209. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.