IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i4p1576-d1338339.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Building Categorization Strategy Guidance in the Historic Area Renovation Process

Author

Listed:
  • Sisi Xia

    (School of Architecture, Southeast University, Nanjing 210096, China)

  • Bomin Liu

    (School of Architecture, Southeast University, Nanjing 210096, China
    Nanjing Urban Planning & Design Institute of SEU, Nanjing 210005, China)

  • Haobing Wang

    (School of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Jiangsu University of Science and Technology, Zhenjiang 212100, China)

Abstract

Under the fast development of city economy and environment, building heritage helps to preserve the cultural identity and history of a place and its people, providing a sense of connection to the past. Historic area renovation is a multifaceted endeavor, combining aspects of culture, architecture, economics, and community engagement. After the outbreak of the COVID-19 epidemic in 2020, three new challenges have been faced by historic area regeneration. First, if the renovation has not been implemented yet, how should building attribute types be classified at the very beginning? Second, if the renovation has stopped due to the epidemic, how should the process be restarted and how should accurate suggestions be given based on previous implementation? Third, when the historic area contains a variety of different styles of buildings, how should the stage of conservation renovation be judged and how should overall guidelines on area conservation be given? A dynamic methodological approach based on the management of three-dimensional information has been proposed by our research team to help monitor changes in building attributes during implementation. A case study was analyzed using the proposed model but paying attention to new aspects of model application. By comparing the buildings represented in three historic areas of Taizhou Old City, buildings before renovation often face problems more on a material level. During the process of renovation, it is necessary to pay more attention to the spiritual level of building problems. Renovation guided by a different subject would lead to different problems in the update process. It is also important to categorize guides based on the proportion of different building types and the prominent conflicts in the area.

Suggested Citation

  • Sisi Xia & Bomin Liu & Haobing Wang, 2024. "Building Categorization Strategy Guidance in the Historic Area Renovation Process," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-30, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:4:p:1576-:d:1338339
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/4/1576/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/4/1576/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Belén Onecha & Alicia Dotor & Carlos Marmolejo-Duarte, 2021. "Beyond Cultural and Historic Values, Sustainability as a New Kind of Value for Historic Buildings," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-18, July.
    2. Abobakr Al-Sakkaf & Tarek Zayed & Ashutosh Bagchi, 2020. "A Sustainability Based Framework for Evaluating the Heritage Buildings," International Journal of Energy Optimization and Engineering (IJEOE), IGI Global, vol. 9(2), pages 49-73, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Farzaneh Karimi & Aliakbar Kamari, 2024. "Adapting Sustainability Certification Systems for Historic Buildings: A Qualitative Comparative Study in Denmark," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(20), pages 1-25, October.
    2. Fupeng Zhang & Lei Shi & Simian Liu & Jiaqi Shi & Cong Shi & Tansheng Xiang, 2022. "CFD-Based Fire Risk Assessment and Control at the Historic Dong Wind and Rain Bridges in the Western Hunan Region: The Case of Huilong Bridge," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-23, September.
    3. Yabing Xu & John Rollo & Yolanda Esteban & Hui Tong & Xin Yin, 2021. "Developing a Comprehensive Assessment Model of Social Value with Respect to Heritage Value for Sustainable Heritage Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-22, December.
    4. Farzaneh Karimi & Nima Valibeig & Gholamhossein Memarian & Aliakbar Kamari, 2022. "Sustainability Rating Systems for Historic Buildings: A Systematic Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-22, September.
    5. Abobakr Al-Sakkaf & Eslam Mohammed Abdelkader & Sherif Mahmoud & Ashutosh Bagchi, 2021. "Studying Energy Performance and Thermal Comfort Conditions in Heritage Buildings: A Case Study of Murabba Palace," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-18, November.
    6. Mateusz Rozmiarek & Ewa Malchrowicz-Mośko & Mateusz Grajek & Arkaitz Castañeda-Babarro & Patxi León-Guereño & Bartosz Prabucki, 2024. "Pro-Environmental Transformation of Cultural Institutions through Sustainable Infrastructural Projects: A Case Study of Poznan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-15, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:4:p:1576-:d:1338339. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.