IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i4p1560-d1337959.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Factors Determining the Choice of Pro-Ecological Products among Generation Z

Author

Listed:
  • Paulina Bełch

    (Faculty of Management, Rzeszow University of Technology, al. Powstańców Warszawy 12, 35-959 Rzeszów, Poland)

  • Marzena Hajduk-Stelmachowicz

    (Faculty of Management, Rzeszow University of Technology, al. Powstańców Warszawy 12, 35-959 Rzeszów, Poland)

  • Katarzyna Chudy-Laskowska

    (Faculty of Management, Rzeszow University of Technology, al. Powstańców Warszawy 12, 35-959 Rzeszów, Poland)

  • Iveta Vozňáková

    (Faculty of Entrepreneurship and Law, Pan-European University, Michálkovická 1810/181, 710 00 Ostrava, Czech Republic)

  • Beáta Gavurová

    (Faculty of Mining, Ecology, Process Control and Geotechnologies, Technical University of Kosice, Letná 9, 042 00 Kosice, Slovakia)

Abstract

(1) Background: This article aims to present the factors influencing purchasing decisions by Generation Z respondents (from Poland, Slovakia, the Czech Republic, and Hungary) relating to pro-ecological products from the electrical machinery industry. Additionally, a model was created allowing us to determine whether the pro-environmental approach is associated with other purchase determinants identified in the factor analysis. (2) Methods: Verification of the objective was carried out using, i.a., a survey method, Delphi and factor analysis, econometric modeling, and the Kruskal–Wallis test. (3) Results: The most significant factors declared by respondents from Generation Z of the V4 countries influencing pro-quality and pro-environmental purchasing decisions from this industry were product price (3.959), previous personal experience with the product (3.959), expected product life (durability) (3.809), and individual customer needs (3.615). The least important determinants were the period for which the product was on the market (2.843) then, surprisingly, product packaging (2.902), and ecolabel (2.921). (4) Conclusions: Interpreting the resulting model, it can be concluded that as the assessment of knowledge and experience as well as the assessment of the brand and image increased, the assessment of the importance of pro-ecological factors also increased. Branding and image are more linked to environmental activities.

Suggested Citation

  • Paulina Bełch & Marzena Hajduk-Stelmachowicz & Katarzyna Chudy-Laskowska & Iveta Vozňáková & Beáta Gavurová, 2024. "Factors Determining the Choice of Pro-Ecological Products among Generation Z," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-19, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:4:p:1560-:d:1337959
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/4/1560/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/4/1560/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Amit Kumar Bhardwaj & Arunesh Garg & Shri Ram & Yuvraj Gajpal & Chengsi Zheng, 2020. "Research Trends in Green Product for Environment: A Bibliometric Perspective," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(22), pages 1-21, November.
    2. Marco Giancola & Maria Chiara Pino & Simonetta D’Amico, 2021. "Exploring the Psychosocial Antecedents of Sustainable Behaviors through the Lens of the Positive Youth Development Approach: A Pioneer Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-10, November.
    3. Simina Teodora Hora & Constantin Bungau & Paul Andrei Negru & Andrei-Flavius Radu, 2023. "Implementing Circular Economy Elements in the Textile Industry: A Bibliometric Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(20), pages 1-24, October.
    4. Barbara Fura, 2022. "The Role of Financial Situation in the Relationship between Environmental Initiatives and Competitive Priorities of Production Companies in Poland," Risks, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-13, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tan, Fuqiang & Li, Xi & Agarwal, Reeti & Joshi, Yatish & Yaqub, Muhammad Zafar, 2024. "Does multilingual packaging influence purchasing in retail segment? Evidence from multiple experiments," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    2. Răzvan-Andrei Corboș & Ovidiu-Iulian Bunea & Monica Triculescu & Sorina Ioana Mișu, 2024. "Which Values Matter Most to Romanian Consumers? Exploring the Impact of Green Attitudes and Communication on Buying Behavior," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(9), pages 1-20, May.
    3. Lingzhi Shao & Qianwen Liu, 2022. "Decision-Making and the Contract of the Complementary Product Supply Chain Considering Consumers’ Environmental Awareness and Government Green Subsidies," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(5), pages 1-27, March.
    4. Cristian Mejia & Yuya Kajikawa, 2021. "The Academic Landscapes of Manufacturing Enterprise Performance and Environmental Sustainability: A Study of Commonalities and Differences," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(7), pages 1-16, March.
    5. Seema Bhardwaj & Kiran Nair & Muhammad Usman Tariq & Asad Ahmad & Asmita Chitnis, 2023. "The State of Research in Green Marketing: A Bibliometric Review from 2005 to 2022," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-16, February.
    6. Andreea Barbu & Ștefan-Alexandru Catană & Dana Corina Deselnicu & Lucian-Ionel Cioca & Alexandra Ioanid, 2022. "Factors Influencing Consumer Behavior toward Green Products: A Systematic Literature Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(24), pages 1-18, December.
    7. Yahdih Semlali & Musaddag Elrayah & Mekimah Sabri & Zighed Rahma & Ismail Bengana, 2024. "How Can Industrial SMEs Achieve Sustainability through Cleaner Production? Green Marketing’s Role as a Mediator," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(19), pages 1-25, October.
    8. Francoise Contreras & Utz Dornberger, 2022. "Sustainable Entrepreneurship as a Field of Knowledge: Analyzing the Global South," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-28, December.
    9. Chuang Li & Chen Li & Liping Wang, 2023. "The Docking Mechanism of Public and Enterprise Green Behavior in China: A Scenario Game Experiment Based on Green Product Classification," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-27, June.
    10. Edwin Paipa-Sanabria & María Belén Orozco-Lopez & Felipe Escalante-Torres & Clara Paola Camargo-Díaz & Julian Andres Zapata-Cortes, 2024. "Exploring the Landscape of Eco-Innovation: A Bibliometric Analysis of Concepts and Trends in the Manufacturing and Shipbuilding Industries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(12), pages 1-25, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:4:p:1560-:d:1337959. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.