IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i4p1551-d1337836.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Spatiotemporal Variation and Prediction Analysis of Land Use/Land Cover and Ecosystem Service Changes in Gannan, China

Author

Listed:
  • Xin Luo

    (College of Forestry, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou 730070, China)

  • Yongzhong Luo

    (College of Forestry, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou 730070, China)

  • Fangjun Le

    (College of Forestry, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou 730070, China)

  • Yishan Zhang

    (College of Forestry, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou 730070, China)

  • Han Zhang

    (College of Forestry, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou 730070, China)

  • Jiaqi Zhai

    (College of Forestry, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou 730070, China)

Abstract

For the preservation of ecosystems, including the enhancement of ecological strategies, examining the temporal and geographical variance in ecosystem services (ESs) and land use/land cover change (LUCC) is crucial. Gannan is situated on the upper Yellow River, which is a notable water conservation region with excellent ecological quality, but in the background of the local traditional production mode and rapid economic development, natural disasters, grassland degradation, and other ecological problems occur frequently. The integrated valuing of ecosystem services and tradeoffs (InVEST) model and the patch-generating land use simulation (PLUS) model are combined in this work to assess the spatiotemporal variance in ESs in Gannan. We set up three scenarios in modeling future land use—ecological protection (EP), natural development (ND), and economic development (ED) in 2050—and analyzed and evaluated the drivers of the variation in ESs. In order to reveal the LUCC in Gannan between 1990 and 2020, we predicted the LUCC and ESs spatial distribution characteristics in 2050, explored the correlation between its driving factors, and comprehensively analyzed and propose optimization measures and protection strategies. Through several simulation experiments, the findings indicate the following: (1) the largest percentage of land expansion for construction in Gannan between 1990 and 2020 is 74.53%, and the most noticeable percentage of shrinkage in the sand area is 20.67%; (2) from 1990 to 2020, Gannan’s water yield, carbon storage, soil retention, and habitat quality all changed, by 60 × 10 8 m 3 , 0.04 × 10 8 t, −10.66 × 10 8 t, and −0.02, respectively; (3) ESs are influenced by a variety of natural and societal variables: the southern and southwestern regions of Gannan are home to the majority of ESs hot spot areas, while the northern region is home to the majority of cold spot areas. This study contributes to the analysis of the developmental traits of Gannan ecosystems and can serve as a model for the preservation of terrestrial ecosystems with comparable environmental traits.

Suggested Citation

  • Xin Luo & Yongzhong Luo & Fangjun Le & Yishan Zhang & Han Zhang & Jiaqi Zhai, 2024. "Spatiotemporal Variation and Prediction Analysis of Land Use/Land Cover and Ecosystem Service Changes in Gannan, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-22, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:4:p:1551-:d:1337836
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/4/1551/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/4/1551/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Matthew Dennis & David Barlow & Gina Cavan & Penny A. Cook & Anna Gilchrist & John Handley & Philip James & Jessica Thompson & Konstantinos Tzoulas & C. Philip Wheater & Sarah Lindley, 2018. "Mapping Urban Green Infrastructure: A Novel Landscape-Based Approach to Incorporating Land Use and Land Cover in the Mapping of Human-Dominated Systems," Land, MDPI, vol. 7(1), pages 1-25, January.
    2. Xichen Che & Liang Jiao & Xuli Zhu & Jingjing Wu & Qian Li, 2023. "Spatial-Temporal Dynamics of Water Conservation in Gannan in the Upper Yellow River Basin of China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-18, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sanja Gašparović & Ana Sopina & Anton Zeneral, 2022. "Impacts of Zagreb’s Urban Development on Dynamic Changes in Stream Landscapes from Mid-Twentieth Century," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-25, May.
    2. Martin Seidl & Manal Saifane, 2021. "A green intensity index to better assess the multiple functions of urban vegetation with an application to Paris metropolitan area," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(10), pages 15204-15224, October.
    3. Vanessa G. Macintyre & Sarah Cotterill & Jamie Anderson & Chris Phillipson & Jack S. Benton & David P. French, 2019. "“I Would Never Come Here Because I’ve Got My Own Garden”: Older Adults’ Perceptions of Small Urban Green Spaces," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-18, June.
    4. Chengjie Yang & Ruren Li & Zongyao Sha, 2020. "Exploring the Dynamics of Urban Greenness Space and Their Driving Factors Using Geographically Weighted Regression: A Case Study in Wuhan Metropolis, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-21, December.
    5. Jake M. Robinson & Anna Jorgensen & Ross Cameron & Paul Brindley, 2020. "Let Nature Be Thy Medicine: A Socioecological Exploration of Green Prescribing in the UK," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(10), pages 1-24, May.
    6. Shruti Lahoti & Mohamed Kefi & Ashish Lahoti & Osamu Saito, 2019. "Mapping Methodology of Public Urban Green Spaces Using GIS: An Example of Nagpur City, India," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-23, April.
    7. Rob Roggema & Nico Tillie & Greg Keeffe & Wanglin Yan, 2021. "Nature-Based Deployment Strategies for Multiple Paces of Change: The Case of Oimachi, Japan," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 6(2), pages 143-161.
    8. Inmaculada Picon-Cabrera & Jesus Maria Garcia-Gago & Luis Javier Sanchez-Aparicio & Pablo Rodriguez-Gonzalvez & Diego Gonzalez-Aguilera, 2020. "On the Use of Historical Flights for the Urban Growth Analysis of Cities Through Time: The Case Study of Avila (Spain)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-17, June.
    9. Xiaofan Xu & Dylan S. P. Schreiber & Qing Lu & Qiong Zhang, 2018. "A GIS-Based Framework Creating Green Stormwater Infrastructure Inventory Relevant to Surface Transportation Planning," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-14, December.
    10. Maria Ignatieva & Fahimeh Mofrad, 2023. "Understanding Urban Green Spaces Typology’s Contribution to Comprehensive Green Infrastructure Planning: A Study of Canberra, the National Capital of Australia," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-27, April.
    11. Gregory Giuliani & Denisa Rodila & Nathan Külling & Ramona Maggini & Anthony Lehmann, 2022. "Downscaling Switzerland Land Use/Land Cover Data Using Nearest Neighbors and an Expert System," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-21, April.
    12. Feng Xu & Guangqing Chi & Yongheng Rao & Jianjun Zhang, 2022. "Editorial for Special Issue “Land Use Change and Anthropogenic Disturbances: Relationships, Interactions, and Management”," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-6, September.
    13. Fernando Castillo-Cabrera & Thilo Wellmann & Dagmar Haase, 2020. "Urban Green Fabric Analysis Promoting Sustainable Planning in Guatemala City," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-26, December.
    14. Edyta Łaszkiewicz & Piotr Czembrowski & Jakub Kronenberg, 2020. "Creating a Map of the Social Functions of Urban Green Spaces in a City with Poor Availability of Spatial Data: A Sociotope for Lodz," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(6), pages 1-25, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:4:p:1551-:d:1337836. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.