IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i3p1301-d1332645.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Role of Low-Cost Digital Solutions in Supporting Industrial Sustainability

Author

Listed:
  • Tasnim A. Abdel-Aty

    (Department of Management, Economics, and Industrial Engineering, Politecnico Di Milano, 20133 Milan, Italy
    Institute for Manufacturing, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 1TN, UK)

  • Duncan McFarlane

    (Institute for Manufacturing, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 1TN, UK)

  • Sam Brooks

    (Institute for Manufacturing, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 1TN, UK)

  • Liz Salter

    (Institute for Manufacturing, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 1TN, UK)

  • Awwal Sanusi Abubakar

    (Institute for Manufacturing, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 1TN, UK)

  • Steve Evans

    (Institute for Manufacturing, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 1TN, UK)

  • Greg Hawkridge

    (Institute for Manufacturing, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 1TN, UK)

  • Kate Price Thomas

    (Institute for Manufacturing, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 1TN, UK)

  • Elisa Negri

    (Department of Management, Economics, and Industrial Engineering, Politecnico Di Milano, 20133 Milan, Italy)

  • Anandarup Mukherjee

    (Institute for Manufacturing, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 1TN, UK)

  • Gokcen Yilmaz

    (Institute for Manufacturing, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 1TN, UK)

  • Marco Macchi

    (Department of Management, Economics, and Industrial Engineering, Politecnico Di Milano, 20133 Milan, Italy)

Abstract

Small and medium enterprise (SME) manufacturers are impeded from participating in sustainability initiatives using new technologies due to the high cost and the lack of clarity on where to start. The integration of low-cost digital solutions has enabled SME manufacturers to adopt Industry 4.0 technologies to support operations. However, using low-cost technologies to address sustainability challenges is underexplored. This article addresses three key research questions: What digital solutions do SMEs need to address industrial sustainability challenges? To what extent can existing low-cost digital solutions be used to address industrial sustainability challenges? How should new digital solutions for developing greater sustainability be prioritised? Three main tasks were conducted. Initially, a new sustainability-focused sub-catalogue was created using an existing catalogue of low-cost solution areas for manufacturing. Secondly, a workshop with 17 participants was used to identify the top ten priority solution areas, with process monitoring, energy monitoring, and quality inspection at the top. Lastly, existing low-cost digital solutions within the top ten priority areas were evaluated to identify how they could contribute to lean manufacturing. Predominantly existing solutions could contribute to waste or use reduction in lean manufacturing. This study provides a foundation for the future development of low-cost solutions for sustainability by indicating manufacturers’ key priority areas and outlining how existing solutions could be adapted to support waste reduction.

Suggested Citation

  • Tasnim A. Abdel-Aty & Duncan McFarlane & Sam Brooks & Liz Salter & Awwal Sanusi Abubakar & Steve Evans & Greg Hawkridge & Kate Price Thomas & Elisa Negri & Anandarup Mukherjee & Gokcen Yilmaz & Marco , 2024. "The Role of Low-Cost Digital Solutions in Supporting Industrial Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-20, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:3:p:1301-:d:1332645
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/3/1301/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/3/1301/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Juanita Álvarez Jaramillo & Jhon Wilder Zartha Sossa & Gina Lía Orozco Mendoza, 2019. "Barriers to sustainability for small and medium enterprises in the framework of sustainable development—Literature review," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(4), pages 512-524, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Asif Mahmood & Rana Tahir Naveed & Naveed Ahmad & Miklas Scholz & Muhammad Khalique & Mohammad Adnan, 2021. "Unleashing the Barriers to CSR Implementation in the SME Sector of a Developing Economy: A Thematic Analysis Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-20, November.
    2. Chiara Mio & Silvia Panfilo & Benedetta Blundo, 2020. "Sustainable development goals and the strategic role of business: A systematic literature review," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(8), pages 3220-3245, December.
    3. Graziela Darla Araujo Galvão & Steve Evans & Paulo Sergio Scoleze Ferrer & Marly Monteiro de Carvalho, 2022. "Circular business model: Breaking down barriers towards sustainable development," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(4), pages 1504-1524, May.
    4. Anna M. Hansson & Eja Pedersen & Niklas P. E. Karlsson & Stefan E. B. Weisner, 2023. "Barriers and drivers for sustainable business model innovation based on a radical farmland change scenario," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 25(8), pages 8083-8106, August.
    5. Antonia Madrid‐Guijarro & Antonio Duréndez, 2024. "Sustainable development barriers and pressures in SMEs: The mediating effect of management commitment to environmental practices," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(2), pages 949-967, February.
    6. Joseph Bakos & Michele Siu & Adalberto Orengo & Narges Kasiri, 2020. "An analysis of environmental sustainability in small & medium‐sized enterprises: Patterns and trends," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(3), pages 1285-1296, March.
    7. Alisher Khamdamov & Zhiwei Tang & Muhammad Ali Hussain, 2023. "Unpacking Parallel Mediation Processes between Green HRM Practices and Sustainable Environmental Performance: Evidence from Uzbekistan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-18, January.
    8. Changchun Zhu & Jianguo Du & Fakhar Shahzad & Muhammad Umair Wattoo, 2022. "Environment Sustainability Is a Corporate Social Responsibility: Measuring the Nexus between Sustainable Supply Chain Management, Big Data Analytics Capabilities, and Organizational Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-20, March.
    9. Paul Arkoh & Antonio Costantini & Francesco Scarpa, 2024. "Determinants of sustainability reporting: A systematic literature review," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(3), pages 1578-1597, May.
    10. Ifaei, Pouya & Tayerani Charmchi, Amir Saman & Loy-Benitez, Jorge & Yang, Rebecca Jing & Yoo, ChangKyoo, 2022. "A data-driven analytical roadmap to a sustainable 2030 in South Korea based on optimal renewable microgrids," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    11. Andrew Mzembe, 2021. "The psychological distance and construal level perspectives of sustainable value creation in SMEs," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 29(2), pages 465-478, March.
    12. Luqman Oyekunle Oyewobi & Richard Ajayi Jimoh, 2022. "Barriers to Adoption of Sustainable Procurement in the Nigerian Public Construction Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-14, November.
    13. Andrea Caccialanza & Riccardo Torelli, 2024. "The role of trade associations in promoting corporate sustainability transition and reporting: A case study in the food supply chain," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(5), pages 4469-4486, September.
    14. Lu Zheng & Konstantinos Iatridis, 2022. "Friends or foes? A systematic literature review and meta‐analysis of the relationship between eco‐innovation and firm performance," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(4), pages 1838-1855, May.
    15. Aleksandra Figurek & Alkis Thrassou, 2023. "An Integrated Framework for Sustainable Development in Agri-Food SMEs," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-22, June.
    16. Fokko J. Eller & Michael M. Gielnik & Hendrik Wimmer & Corinna Thölke & Sara Holzapfel & Silke Tegtmeier & Jantje Halberstadt, 2020. "Identifying business opportunities for sustainable development: Longitudinal and experimental evidence contributing to the field of sustainable entrepreneurship," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(3), pages 1387-1403, March.
    17. Felippe Santos & Rodrigo Lozano & Maria Barreiro-Gen, 2024. "Analysing the drivers for sustainable public procurement," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 44(4), pages 966-979, December.
    18. Weiran Cao & Zengjie Cai & Xu Yao & Lifeng Chen, 2023. "Digital Transformation to Help Carbon Neutrality and Green Sustainable Development Based on the Metaverse," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-15, April.
    19. Michaela Carni & Tamar Gur & Yossi Maaravi, 2024. "Entrepreneurs’ Social Capital in Overcoming Business Challenges: Case Studies of Seven Greentech, Climate Tech and Agritech Startups," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(19), pages 1-26, September.
    20. Angelo Arcuri & Lorenzo Giolli, 2022. "The relationship between upstream vertical integration and environmental sustainability in the luxury fashion industry," SN Business & Economics, Springer, vol. 2(7), pages 1-20, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:3:p:1301-:d:1332645. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.