IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i3p1299-d1332600.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Design-Driven Innovation in Urban Context—Exploring the Sustainable Development of City Design Weeks

Author

Listed:
  • Han Han

    (Division of Arts, College of Art and Design, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen 518060, China)

  • You Wu

    (Division of Arts, College of Art and Design, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen 518060, China)

  • Zhan Su

    (School of Chinese Language and Literature, Beijing Language and Culture University, Beijing 100083, China)

  • Francesco Zurlo

    (Department of Design, Politecnico di Milano, 20158 Milan, Italy)

Abstract

As the imperative of sustainable development of cities has gained heightened attention within the global creative and cultural industries in the last decade, among all the relevant trials and practices, city design weeks are becoming a notable method offering diverse possibilities for the innovative approaches the cities could apply to their development. Therefore, the objective of the research is to understand how city design weeks facilitate urban sustainable development and how design-driven innovation is implemented in such a context. Employing a qualitative methodology, the study conducts a case study across 30 global design weeks, selected through a cross-validated process with the World Design Weeks global network and UNESCO City of Design network. Grounded in the design-driven innovation perspective, valid data from 2017 to 2022 is gathered in response to the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) primarily through extensive interviews, official project reports, and media communication materials. The data are further cross-analysed by adapting the Creative Cities Index into 10 indicators suitable for the context of design weeks. Among the research findings, three types of design-driven models emerge for the innovation practice of city design weeks: metropolitan integrative transformation and innovation, inclusive cultural diversity communion and innovation, and cluster incorporation and collaborative innovation. In this way, the study provides both the practical significance in terms of supporting the design week organisation by implementing suitable approaches to drive the city’s sustainable development and the theoretical significance in extending the possible adaptation of a design-driven innovation model for the urban development context. Furthermore, the limitation of this qualitative study opens avenues for future quantitative impact analyses on individual design weeks, providing applicable evaluation methods to iteratively inspect and refine the models over time, which complement the limitations of the current qualitative research.

Suggested Citation

  • Han Han & You Wu & Zhan Su & Francesco Zurlo, 2024. "Design-Driven Innovation in Urban Context—Exploring the Sustainable Development of City Design Weeks," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-30, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:3:p:1299-:d:1332600
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/3/1299/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/3/1299/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dorin Maier & Mihaela Maftei & Andreea Maier & Gabriela Elena Bitan, 2019. "A Review of Product Innovation Management Literature in the Context of Organization Sustainable Development," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 21(S13), pages 816-816, November.
    2. Caroline Chapain & Dominique Sagot-Duvauroux, 2020. "Cultural and creative clusters – a systematic literature review and a renewed research agenda," Urban Research & Practice, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(3), pages 300-329, July.
    3. Anna Katharina Provasnek & Erwin Schmid & Bernhard Geissler & Gerald Steiner, 2017. "Sustainable Corporate Entrepreneurship: Performance and Strategies Toward Innovation," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 26(4), pages 521-535, May.
    4. repec:pes:ierequ:v:11:y:2016:i:4:p:43-62 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. Monica Calcagno & Erika Cavriani, 2014. "Reimagining the design in the middle earth: From design driven innovation to design boosted cultural heritage," Working Papers 24, Venice School of Management - Department of Management, Università Ca' Foscari Venezia.
    6. Ashish Arora & Andrea Fosfuri & Alfonso Gambardella, 2004. "Markets for Technology: The Economics of Innovation and Corporate Strategy," MIT Press Books, The MIT Press, edition 1, volume 1, number 0262511819, April.
    7. Paul Chatterton, 2000. "Will the real Creative City please stand up?," City, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 4(3), pages 390-397, November.
    8. Rafal Zelazny & Jacek Pietrucha, 2017. "Measuring Innovation And Institution: The Creative Economy Index," Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy, Institute of Economic Research, vol. 12(1), pages 43-62, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Velma Zahirovic-Herbert & Karen M Gibler, 2022. "The effect of film production studios on housing prices in Atlanta, the Hollywood of the South," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 59(4), pages 771-788, March.
    2. Gonçalo Rodrigues Brás & Miguel Torres Preto, 2021. "The consequences of intrapreneurship in exporting firms: a structural-model approach," CeBER Working Papers 2021-06, Centre for Business and Economics Research (CeBER), University of Coimbra.
    3. Irina Maiorescu & Mihaela Bucur & Bogdan Georgescu & Daniel Moise & Vasile Alecsandru Strat & Ion Daniel Zgură, 2020. "Social Media and IOT Wearables in Developing Marketing Strategies. Do SMEs Differ From Large Enterprises?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-18, September.
    4. Gaétan de Rassenfosse & Adam B. Jaffe & Joel Waldfogel, 2024. "Intellectual Property and Creative Machines," NBER Chapters, in: Entrepreneurship and Innovation Policy and the Economy, volume 4, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    5. Hanna Hottenrott & Bronwyn H. Hall & Dirk Czarnitzki, 2016. "Patents as quality signals? The implications for financing constraints on R&D," Economics of Innovation and New Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(3), pages 197-217, April.
    6. Laura Magazzini & Fabio Pammolli & Massimo Riccaboni & Maria Alessandra Rossi, 2009. "Patent disclosure and R&D competition in pharmaceuticals," Economics of Innovation and New Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(5), pages 467-486.
    7. YoungJun Kim & Nicholas S. Vonortas, 2006. "Determinants of technology licensing: the case of licensors," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 27(4), pages 235-249.
    8. Carlos J. Serrano & Rosemarie Ziedonis, 2018. "How Redeployable are Patent Assets? Evidence from Failed Startups," NBER Working Papers 24526, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    9. Shane Greenstein, 2008. "Economic Experiments and Neutrality in Internet Access," NBER Chapters, in: Innovation Policy and the Economy, Volume 8, pages 59-109, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    10. Magerman, Tom & Looy, Bart Van & Debackere, Koenraad, 2015. "Does involvement in patenting jeopardize one’s academic footprint? An analysis of patent-paper pairs in biotechnology," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 44(9), pages 1702-1713.
    11. Hana Urbancová & Pavla Vrabcová, 2023. "Sustainability-oriented Innovation: Crucial Sources to Achieve Competitiveness," Journal of Economics / Ekonomicky casopis, Institute of Economic Research, Slovak Academy of Sciences, vol. 71(1), pages 46-64, January.
    12. Clementino, Ester & Perkins, Richard, 2020. "How do companies respond to environmental, social and governance (ESG) ratings? Evidence from Italy," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 103046, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    13. Dongsoo Shin & Sungho Yun, 2008. "Informed principal and information gathering agent," Review of Economic Design, Springer;Society for Economic Design, vol. 12(4), pages 229-244, December.
    14. Ubaid Ullah Khan & Yousaf Ali & Mónika Garai-Fodor & Ágnes Csiszárik-Kocsir, 2023. "Application of Project Management Techniques for Timeline and Budgeting Estimates of Startups," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(21), pages 1-18, November.
    15. Bronwyn H. Hall & Grid Thoma & Salvatore Torrisi, 2009. "Financial Patenting in Europe," NBER Working Papers 14714, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    16. Luca Sandrini, 2024. "Price Versus Market Share with Royalty Licensing: Incomplete Adoption of a Superior Technology with Heterogeneous Firms," Review of Industrial Organization, Springer;The Industrial Organization Society, vol. 64(2), pages 243-265, March.
    17. Ghafele, Roya, 2010. "Die Institutionalisierung von Wissensbeständen in Österreich. Die Diskrepanz zwischen wirtschaftlicher Realität und Politik [The Institutionalization of Knowledge in Austria. Briding the Gap betwee," MPRA Paper 36550, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 08 Jan 2012.
    18. Gambardella, Alfonso & Giuri, Paola & Luzzi, Alessandra, 2007. "The market for patents in Europe," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(8), pages 1163-1183, October.
    19. Emeric Henry & Carlos J. Ponce, 2008. "Waiting to Copy: On the Dynamics of the Market for Technology," Working Papers hal-01066192, HAL.
    20. Zeng, Juying & Ning, Zhenzhen & Lassala, Carlos & Ribeiro-Navarrete, Samuel, 2023. "Effect of innovative-city pilot policy on industry–university–research collaborative innovation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 162(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:3:p:1299-:d:1332600. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.