IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i3p1174-d1329793.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Greater Energy Independence with Sustainable Steel Production

Author

Listed:
  • Sandra Kiessling

    (Department of Engineering, Staffordshire University, Mellor Building, College Road, Stoke-on-Trent ST4 2DE, UK)

  • Hamidreza Gohari Darabkhani

    (Department of Engineering, Staffordshire University, Mellor Building, College Road, Stoke-on-Trent ST4 2DE, UK)

  • Abdel-Hamid Soliman

    (Department of Engineering, Staffordshire University, Mellor Building, College Road, Stoke-on-Trent ST4 2DE, UK)

Abstract

Global energy market price volatility and an upward trajectory of prices per unit of electricity have sent all industrial sectors and many economies to the brink of recession. Alongside the urgent need for decarbonisation of all industries, achieving a globally higher level of energy independence across all sectors seems imperative. A multi-disciplinary approach with a proposed system of CO 2 emissions reduction and capture technologies has the potential for short-term emissions reduction to near-zero in the steel industry—although some of the mechanisms can be implemented across most heavy industries. The findings of this research show a CO 2 emissions reduction of ~30% from 977 t of CO 2 to 684 t in one single blast furnace production cycle (based on 330 tonnes of liquid iron production capacity, with the mean of 2.1–3.2 tonnes CO 2 /t of steel and chemical reactions emissions applied), by switching the electricity provider for operating the electric heaters to providers generating energy exclusively from renewable sources. Replacing coal with biomass and adding post-combustion capture units to the blast furnace operation, will add carbon neutrality into the process—resulting in CO 2 emissions reduction to near-zero. Carbon capture from biomass utilisation (BECCS) will add the benefit of carbon-negative emissions to the cycle. Simultaneously, energy-saving and process improvement measures implementation (up to 60% efficiency increase), excess heat recovery <30% of energy savings, and retrofitting renewable energy technology resulted in an energy independence of 88%. Engineering solutions, partly subsidised in the UK, are readily available for implementation in the iron and steel manufacturing industry.

Suggested Citation

  • Sandra Kiessling & Hamidreza Gohari Darabkhani & Abdel-Hamid Soliman, 2024. "Greater Energy Independence with Sustainable Steel Production," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-18, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:3:p:1174-:d:1329793
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/3/1174/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/3/1174/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Langley, K.F., 1986. "Energy efficiency in the UK iron and steel industry," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 23(2), pages 73-107.
    2. Jorrit Gosens & Alex Turnbull & Frank Jotzo, 2021. "An installation-level model of China's coal sector shows how its decarbonization and energy security plans will reduce overseas coal imports," Papers 2112.06357, arXiv.org, revised Dec 2021.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sandra Kiessling & Hamidreza Gohari Darabkhani & Abdel-Hamid Soliman, 2022. "The Bio Steel Cycle: 7 Steps to Net-Zero CO 2 Emissions Steel Production," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(23), pages 1-22, November.
    2. Wang, Peng & Zhao, Shen & Dai, Tao & Peng, Kun & Zhang, Qi & Li, Jiashuo & Chen, Wei-Qiang, 2022. "Regional disparities in steel production and restrictions to progress on global decarbonization: A cross-national analysis," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    3. Matino, Ismael & Colla, Valentina & Baragiola, Stefano, 2017. "Quantification of energy and environmental impacts in uncommon electric steelmaking scenarios to improve process sustainability," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 207(C), pages 543-552.
    4. Konstantinos Koasidis & Alexandros Nikas & Hera Neofytou & Anastasios Karamaneas & Ajay Gambhir & Jakob Wachsmuth & Haris Doukas, 2020. "The UK and German Low-Carbon Industry Transitions from a Sectoral Innovation and System Failures Perspective," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-34, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:3:p:1174-:d:1329793. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.