IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i2p868-d1322528.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Artificial Intelligence Evaluates How Humans Connect to the Built Environment: A Pilot Study of Two Experiments in Biophilia

Author

Listed:
  • Tobias M. Ramm

    (Cologne Institute for Information Systems (CIIS), University of Köln, Pohligstraße 1, 50969 Cologne, Germany)

  • Mathias Werwie

    (Cologne Institute for Information Systems (CIIS), University of Köln, Pohligstraße 1, 50969 Cologne, Germany)

  • Tim Otto

    (Cologne Institute for Information Systems (CIIS), University of Köln, Pohligstraße 1, 50969 Cologne, Germany)

  • Peter A. Gloor

    (Cologne Institute for Information Systems (CIIS), University of Köln, Pohligstraße 1, 50969 Cologne, Germany
    MIT Center for Collective Intelligence, Cambridge, MA 02142, USA
    Galaxylabs, Laurenzenvorstadt 69, 5000 Aarau, Switzerland)

  • Nikos A. Salingaros

    (Galaxylabs, Laurenzenvorstadt 69, 5000 Aarau, Switzerland
    Departments of Mathematics and Architecture, University of Texas at San Antonio, One UTSA Circle, San Antonio, TX 78249, USA)

Abstract

Many factors influence well-being and health in everyday life. While people are aware of traffic delays or continuous work stress, other factors influence the state of the body on a subconscious level. The built environment subconsciously influences human physiology during every second of life, which has a cumulative long-term effect. The idea of biophilic design identifies the importance of natural elements implemented in architectural structures to improve the occupants’ health and well-being. This paper measures the impact of biophilic design on positive emotions and productivity in two separate but conceptually related pilot studies that apply novel approaches: (a) facial emotion recognition (FER) with residual masking networks and (b) sentiment detection using Large Language Models. The first study measures the emotions of people when confronted with images of different kinds of architecture, via FER and via a user survey. We find clear trends for emotions detected by FER and significant evidence for self-stated emotions that architecture implementing biophilic design evokes more positive emotions. The second study measures the influence of natural elements on productivity and team engagement. The findings show that natural elements in the surroundings do influence productivity and sentiment positively. As the sample size of subjects, especially for the second study, was relatively small, future research will need to apply these ideas in a larger setup to acquire further evidence for the importance of biophilic design for human well-being and health.

Suggested Citation

  • Tobias M. Ramm & Mathias Werwie & Tim Otto & Peter A. Gloor & Nikos A. Salingaros, 2024. "Artificial Intelligence Evaluates How Humans Connect to the Built Environment: A Pilot Study of Two Experiments in Biophilia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-19, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:2:p:868-:d:1322528
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/2/868/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/2/868/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Richard P. Taylor, 2021. "The Potential of Biophilic Fractal Designs to Promote Health and Performance: A Review of Experiments and Applications," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-24, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yuxiang Lan & Qunyue Liu, 2023. "The Restorative and Contingent Value of Biophilic Indoor Environments in Healthcare Settings," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-15, July.
    2. Deborah Lefosse & Arjan van Timmeren & Carlo Ratti, 2023. "Biophilia Upscaling: A Systematic Literature Review Based on a Three-Metric Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(22), pages 1-34, November.
    3. Dorothy Day Huntsman & Grzegorz Bulaj, 2022. "Healthy Dwelling: Design of Biophilic Interior Environments Fostering Self-Care Practices for People Living with Migraines, Chronic Pain, and Depression," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(4), pages 1-16, February.
    4. Richard P. Taylor & Richard York, 2022. "Fractal shifts and esthetic rifts: climate change and emotional well-being," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 173(1), pages 1-9, July.
    5. Michael W. Mehaffy & Nikos A. Salingaros & Alexandros A. Lavdas, 2023. "The “Modern” Campus: Case Study in (Un)Sustainable Urbanism," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(23), pages 1-37, November.
    6. Marco Aresta & Nikos A. Salingaros, 2021. "The Importance of Domestic Space in the Times of COVID-19," Challenges, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-9, October.
    7. Hung-Ming Tu, 2022. "Confirmative biophilic framework for heritage management," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(3), pages 1-19, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:2:p:868-:d:1322528. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.