IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i2p823-d481123.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Potential of Biophilic Fractal Designs to Promote Health and Performance: A Review of Experiments and Applications

Author

Listed:
  • Richard P. Taylor

    (Physics Department, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR 97403, USA)

Abstract

Fractal objects are prevalent in natural scenery. Their repetition of patterns at increasingly fine magnifications creates a rich complexity. Fractals displaying mid-range complexity are the most common and include trees, clouds, and mountains. The “fractal fluency” model states that human vision has adapted to process these mid-range fractals with ease. I will first discuss fractal fluency and demonstrate how it enhances the observer’s visual capabilities by focusing on experiments that have important practical consequences for improving the built environment. These enhanced capabilities generate an aesthetic experience and physiological stress reduction. I will discuss strategies for integrating fractals into building designs to induce positive impacts on the observer. Examples include fractal solar panels, fractal window shades, and fractal floor patterns. These applications of fractal fluency represent a fundamental and potentially impactful form of salutogenesis.

Suggested Citation

  • Richard P. Taylor, 2021. "The Potential of Biophilic Fractal Designs to Promote Health and Performance: A Review of Experiments and Applications," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-24, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:2:p:823-:d:481123
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/2/823/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/2/823/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. R P Taylor & T P Martin & R D Montgomery & J H Smith & A P Micolich & C Boydston & B C Scannell & M S Fairbanks & B Spehar, 2017. "Seeing shapes in seemingly random spatial patterns: Fractal analysis of Rorschach inkblots," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(2), pages 1-17, February.
    2. Richard Taylor, 2009. "Reflecting the impossible," Nature, Nature, vol. 460(7254), pages 462-462, July.
    3. Colleen A Marlow & Indre V Viskontas & Alisa Matlin & Cooper Boydston & Adam Boxer & Richard P Taylor, 2015. "Temporal Structure of Human Gaze Dynamics Is Invariant During Free Viewing," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(9), pages 1-13, September.
    4. Alison Abbott, 2006. "In the hands of a master," Nature, Nature, vol. 439(7077), pages 648-650, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Deborah Lefosse & Arjan van Timmeren & Carlo Ratti, 2023. "Biophilia Upscaling: A Systematic Literature Review Based on a Three-Metric Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(22), pages 1-34, November.
    2. Dorothy Day Huntsman & Grzegorz Bulaj, 2022. "Healthy Dwelling: Design of Biophilic Interior Environments Fostering Self-Care Practices for People Living with Migraines, Chronic Pain, and Depression," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(4), pages 1-16, February.
    3. Yuxiang Lan & Qunyue Liu, 2023. "The Restorative and Contingent Value of Biophilic Indoor Environments in Healthcare Settings," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-15, July.
    4. Hung-Ming Tu, 2022. "Confirmative biophilic framework for heritage management," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(3), pages 1-19, March.
    5. Richard P. Taylor & Richard York, 2022. "Fractal shifts and esthetic rifts: climate change and emotional well-being," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 173(1), pages 1-9, July.
    6. Michael W. Mehaffy & Nikos A. Salingaros & Alexandros A. Lavdas, 2023. "The “Modern” Campus: Case Study in (Un)Sustainable Urbanism," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(23), pages 1-37, November.
    7. Marco Aresta & Nikos A. Salingaros, 2021. "The Importance of Domestic Space in the Times of COVID-19," Challenges, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-9, October.
    8. Tobias M. Ramm & Mathias Werwie & Tim Otto & Peter A. Gloor & Nikos A. Salingaros, 2024. "Artificial Intelligence Evaluates How Humans Connect to the Built Environment: A Pilot Study of Two Experiments in Biophilia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-19, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tommaso Costa & Giuseppe Boccignone & Franco Cauda & Mario Ferraro, 2016. "The Foraging Brain: Evidence of Lévy Dynamics in Brain Networks," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(9), pages 1-16, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:2:p:823-:d:481123. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.