IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i2p823-d1321328.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

SAMSax—An Innovative Living Lab for the Advancement of a Circular Economy through Additive Manufacturing Technologies

Author

Listed:
  • Adelina Berkemeier

    (Ergonomics and Innovation Management, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Chemnitz University of Technology, 09125 Chemnitz, Germany)

  • Lisa Kühnel

    (Additive Manufacturing, Institute for Machine Elements, Engineering Design and Manufacturing, TU Bergakademie Freiberg, 09599 Freiberg, Germany)

  • Dominik Dürigen

    (Wood Technology and Fibre Materials Technology, Dresden University of Technology, 01309 Dresden, Germany)

  • Holger Hoffmann

    (Ergonomics and Innovation Management, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Chemnitz University of Technology, 09125 Chemnitz, Germany)

  • Henning Zeidler

    (Additive Manufacturing, Institute for Machine Elements, Engineering Design and Manufacturing, TU Bergakademie Freiberg, 09599 Freiberg, Germany)

  • Angelika C. Bullinger

    (Ergonomics and Innovation Management, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Chemnitz University of Technology, 09125 Chemnitz, Germany)

  • André Wagenführ

    (Wood Technology and Fibre Materials Technology, Dresden University of Technology, 01309 Dresden, Germany)

Abstract

The sustainable development of products is of great interest to both industry and consumers due to various factors, such as anthropogenic climate change and the scarcity of resources and materials. In response to this, the simul + Living Lab Sustainable Additive Manufacturing in Saxony (SAMSax) has been established as a physical experimental space aimed at improving the sustainability of products. This includes selecting resource-efficient manufacturing processes, using renewable materials, reducing energy consumption during use, and designing for recyclability. The innovative approach of the lab also integrates an open innovation process, involving present and potential stakeholders. Collaborating closely with stakeholders from industry, academia, and government fosters idea generation, provides solution approaches, and enhances acceptance and practical implementation. Methodologically, SAMSax focuses on upcycling organic and inorganic residues as well as by-products from industry and agriculture, reintegrating them as innovative components in industrial production using additive manufacturing (“3D printing”). The Living Lab provides a space for networking and active knowledge transfer through digital technologies, analyses, and collaborative developments, enabling the testing and evaluation of innovations in a real-world environment. Several potential waste materials suitable for additive manufacturing and new products have already been identified. In addition to industrial residues, materials, such as paper and wood dust; industrial by-products, such as sand; and agricultural residues, like harvest residues, are being analyzed, processed, and tested using additive manufacturing in the laboratory. In this way, SAMSax can contribute to an integrated and consistent circular economy. The research aims to demonstrate that the SAMSax Living Lab is a crucial driver of innovation in the field of additive manufacturing. Furthermore, this study contributes by presenting the Living Lab as an application-oriented research environment, focusing on innovative implementation in small- and medium-sized enterprises.

Suggested Citation

  • Adelina Berkemeier & Lisa Kühnel & Dominik Dürigen & Holger Hoffmann & Henning Zeidler & Angelika C. Bullinger & André Wagenführ, 2024. "SAMSax—An Innovative Living Lab for the Advancement of a Circular Economy through Additive Manufacturing Technologies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-22, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:2:p:823-:d:1321328
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/2/823/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/2/823/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Irene Bouwma & Seerp Wigboldus & Jorieke Potters & Trond Selnes & Sabine van Rooij & Judith Westerink, 2022. "Sustainability Transitions and the Contribution of Living Labs: A Framework to Assess Collective Capabilities and Contextual Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-19, November.
    2. Edward B. Barbier, 2021. "The Evolution of Economic Views on Natural Resource Scarcity," Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 15(1), pages 24-44.
    3. Eva Barteková & Peter Börkey, 2022. "Digitalisation for the transition to a resource efficient and circular economy," OECD Environment Working Papers 192, OECD Publishing.
    4. Adriana Neligan & Rupert J. Baumgartner & Martin Geissdoerfer & Josef‐Peter Schöggl, 2023. "Circular disruption: Digitalisation as a driver of circular economy business models," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(3), pages 1175-1188, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Shiyu Wu & Xinyi Li & Xiaosen Du & Zexin Li, 2022. "The Impact of ESG Performance on Firm Value: The Moderating Role of Ownership Structure," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-22, November.
    2. Yongchao Wu & Xinyuan Wei & Yanan Liu & Huilong Li, 2024. "Can the Circular Economy Demonstration Policy Enhance the Green Innovation Level? A Quasi-Natural Experiment from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-17, April.
    3. Alan Randall, 2022. "How Strong Sustainability Became Safety," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-17, April.
    4. Zhao, Qi & Guo, Ming & Feng, Fangfang & Li, Junjun & Guan, Hangtian, 2024. "Path analysis of digital development on the green industrial transformation of Chinese resource-based enterprises," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 93(C).
    5. Roger Fouquet & Ralph Hippe, 2022. "Twin Transitions of Decarbonisation and Digitalisation: A Historical Perspective on Energy and Information in European Economies," Working Papers 08-22, Association Française de Cliométrie (AFC).
    6. Alan Randall, 2021. "Resource Scarcity and Sustainability—The Shapes Have Shifted but the Stakes Keep Rising," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-16, May.
    7. Hondroyiannis, G. & Sardianou, E. & Nikou, V. & Evangelinos, K. & Nikolaou, I., 2024. "Circular economy and macroeconomic performance: Evidence across 28 European countries," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 215(C).
    8. Chua, Celine & Li, Xue & Tan, Kim Hock & Yuen, Kum Fai, 2024. "Building sustainable performance in the maritime industry via digital resources and innovation," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 282-299.
    9. Rita Henriques & Filipa Figueiredo & João Nunes, 2023. "Product-Services for a Resource-Efficient and Circular Economy: An Updated Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-24, August.
    10. Fanny E. Berigüete & Inma Rodriguez Cantalapiedra & Mariana Palumbo & Torsten Masseck, 2023. "Collective Intelligence to Co-Create the Cities of the Future: Proposal of an Evaluation Tool for Citizen Initiatives," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-28, May.
    11. Addison, Tony & Ghoshray, Atanu, 2023. "Discerning trends in international metal prices in the presence of nonstationary volatility," Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    12. Gao, Wang & Wei, Jiajia & Zhang, Hongwei & Zhang, Haizhen, 2024. "Does climate policy uncertainty exacerbate extreme risk spillovers between green economy and energy metals?," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    13. Meran, Georg, 2023. "Is green growth possible and even desirable in a spaceship economy?," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 213(C).
    14. Hellström, Daniel & Olsson, John, 2024. "Let's go thrift shopping: Exploring circular business model innovation in fashion retail," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 198(C).
    15. Laima Gerlitz & Christopher Meyer & Lawrence Henesey, 2024. "Sourcing Sustainability Transition in Small and Medium-Sized Ports of the Baltic Sea Region: A Case of Sustainable Futuring with Living Labs," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-38, May.
    16. Siraphat Padthar & Phaninee Naruetharadhol & Wutthiya Aekthanate Srisathan & Chavis Ketkaew, 2024. "From Linear to Circular Economy: Embracing Digital Innovations for Sustainable Agri-Food Waste Management among Farmers and Retailers," Resources, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-29, June.
    17. Becker, Christian U., 2023. "Ethical underpinnings for the economy of the Anthropocene: Sustainability ethics as key to a sustainable economy," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 211(C).
    18. Karlilar, Selin & Balcilar, Mehmet & Emir, Firat, 2023. "Environmental sustainability in the OECD: The power of digitalization, green innovation, renewable energy and financial development," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 47(6).
    19. Muhammad Salman Pathan & Edana Richardson & Edgar Galvan & Peter Mooney, 2023. "The Role of Artificial Intelligence within Circular Economy Activities—A View from Ireland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-18, June.
    20. Bai, Xue & Zhong, Jingqiu & Huang, Dong, 2024. "Economic instruments for natural resource efficiency: The role of carbon taxation and fiscal policy," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:2:p:823-:d:1321328. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.