IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i2p525-d1314748.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Adaptive Virtual Impedance Control with MPC’s Cost Function for DG Inverters in a Microgrid with Mismatched Feeder Impedances for Future Energy Communities

Author

Listed:
  • Mubashir Hayat Khan

    (Department of Electrical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Technology, University of Poonch Rawalakot, Ghazi e Millat Road-Rawalakot AJ&K, Rawalakot 12350, Pakistan)

  • Shamsul Aizam Zulkifli

    (Department of Electrical Engineering, Faculty of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia, Parit Raja, Batu Pahat 86400, Johor, Malaysia)

  • Nedim Tutkun

    (Department of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, Istanbul Ticaret University, 34840 Istanbul, Türkiye)

  • Alessandro Burgio

    (Independent Researcher, 87036 Rende, CS, Italy)

Abstract

More and more distributed generations (DGs), such as wind, PV or battery bank sources, are connected to electric systems or customer loads. However, the locations of these DGs are based on the highest energy that can be potentially harvested for electric power generation. Therefore, these locations create different line impedances based on the distance from the DGs to the loads or the point of common coupling (PCC). This paper presents an adaptive virtual impedance (AVI) in the predictive control scheme in order to ensure power sharing accuracy and voltage stability at the PCC in a microgrid network. The reference voltage from mismatched feeder impedances was modified by utilizing the suggested AVI-based predictive control for creating equal power sharing between the DGs in order to avoid overburdening any individual DG with low-rated power. The AVI strategy used droop control as the input control for generating equal power sharing, while the AVI output was used as the reference voltage for the finite control set–model predictive control (FCS-MPC) for creating a minimum voltage error deviation for the cost function (CF) for the inverter’s vector switching pattern in order to improve voltage stability at the PCC. The proposed AVI-based controller was tested using two DG inverter circuits in a decentralized control mode with different values of line impedance and rated power. The performance of the suggested controller was compared via MATLAB/Simulink with that of a controller based on static virtual impedance (SVI) in terms of efficiency of power sharing and voltage stability at the PCC. From the results, it was found that (1) the voltage transient magnitude for the AVI-based controller was reduced within less than 0.02 s, and the voltage at the PCC was maintained with about 0.9% error which is the least as compared with those for the SVI-based controller and (2) equal power sharing between the DGs increased during the change in the load demand when using the AVI-based controller as compared with using the SVI-based controller. The proposed controller was capable of giving more accurate power sharing between the DGs, as well as maintaining the voltage at the PCC, which makes it suitable for the power generation of consumer loads based on DG locations for future energy communities.

Suggested Citation

  • Mubashir Hayat Khan & Shamsul Aizam Zulkifli & Nedim Tutkun & Alessandro Burgio, 2024. "Adaptive Virtual Impedance Control with MPC’s Cost Function for DG Inverters in a Microgrid with Mismatched Feeder Impedances for Future Energy Communities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-23, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:2:p:525-:d:1314748
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/2/525/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/2/525/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jihed Hmad & Azeddine Houari & Allal El Moubarek Bouzid & Abdelhakim Saim & Hafedh Trabelsi, 2023. "A Review on Mode Transition Strategies between Grid-Connected and Standalone Operation of Voltage Source Inverters-Based Microgrids," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(13), pages 1-41, June.
    2. Im, Hyun Joong, 2019. "Asymmetric peer effects in capital structure dynamics," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 176(C), pages 17-22.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jiali Liu & Xinran Xie & Yu Duan & Liang Tang, 2023. "Peer effects and the mechanisms in corporate capital structure: evidence from Chinese listed firms," Oeconomia Copernicana, Institute of Economic Research, vol. 14(1), pages 295-326, March.
    2. Mate, Mariluz & Occhino, Paolo, 2020. "A proposal to estimate the valuation of small and medium size companies using geographically comparable information," Small Business International Review, Asociación Española de Contabilidad y Administración de Empresas - AECA, vol. 4(1), pages 34-51, January.
    3. Im, Hyun Joong & Kang, Ya & Shon, Janghoon, 2020. "How does uncertainty influence target capital structure?," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    4. Ali-Rind, Asad & Boubaker, Sabri & Jarjir, Souad Lajili, 2023. "Peer effects in financial economics: A literature survey," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    5. Zhang, Haolin & Feng, Yongqi & Wang, Ying & Ni, Juan, 2024. "Peer effects in corporate financialization: The role of Fintech in financial decision making," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    6. Im, Hyun Joong & Faff, Robert & Ha, Chang Yong, 2022. "Uncertainty, investment spikes, and corporate leverage adjustments," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 145(C).
    7. Abdullah M. Abusorrah & Hamed Sepahvand, 2024. "A Frequency/Phase/Amplitude Estimator for Three-Phase Applications Operating at a Low Sampling Rate," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-18, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:2:p:525-:d:1314748. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.