IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i24p11214-d1548949.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Analysis of Greenhouse Gas Emissions of a Mill According to the Greenhouse Gas Protocol

Author

Listed:
  • Magdalena Wróbel-Jędrzejewska

    (Department of Technology and Refrigeration Techniques, Prof. Wacław Dąbrowski Institute of Agriculture and Food Biotechnology—State Research Institute, Al. Marszałka J. Piłsudskiego 84, 92-202 Łódź, Poland)

  • Ewelina Włodarczyk

    (Department of Technology and Refrigeration Techniques, Prof. Wacław Dąbrowski Institute of Agriculture and Food Biotechnology—State Research Institute, Al. Marszałka J. Piłsudskiego 84, 92-202 Łódź, Poland)

  • Łukasz Przybysz

    (Department of Technology and Refrigeration Techniques, Prof. Wacław Dąbrowski Institute of Agriculture and Food Biotechnology—State Research Institute, Al. Marszałka J. Piłsudskiego 84, 92-202 Łódź, Poland)

Abstract

This article discusses the challenges of adapting to and mitigating climate change through sustainable resource management in the agri-food sector. These aspects are mandatory obligations for businesses under new EU directives and regulations. Greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions must be controlled at every stage of the value chain, from the acquisition of raw materials to transportation and cooperation with suppliers. The purpose of this paper is to analyze the areas generating GHG emissions in the agri-food enterprise toward the development of guidelines for the sustainable development of domestic food production. This paper presents a GHG study in three scopes at one of the mills in Poland based on the GHG protocol methodology. The analysis of consumption of energy carriers was used to determine GHG emissions (Scopes 1 and 2), and the total amounted to about 2.1 million kg CO 2eq (the share of Scope 1 was about 16% and Scope 2 as high as 83%), and the average carbon footprint of flour production in terms of unit weight was 0.040 kg CO 2eq /kg. Extending the analysis to Scope 3, the emissions associated with this scope accounted for the largest share (92%), while Scopes 1 and 2 accounted for only 8%. The determined carbon footprint (considering the three GHG emission scopes) was 0.52 kg CO 2eq /kg. In Scope 3, the largest contribution was from category 1 emissions (92%) related to grain cultivation, and category 5 (6%) were emissions related to the transportation of sold products. The smallest impact is from category 3 emissions related to the management of generated waste. Regular calculation and reporting of emissions in each area enables the company to more fully understand its environmental impact, identify risks and implement changes that bring financial and environmental benefits.

Suggested Citation

  • Magdalena Wróbel-Jędrzejewska & Ewelina Włodarczyk & Łukasz Przybysz, 2024. "Analysis of Greenhouse Gas Emissions of a Mill According to the Greenhouse Gas Protocol," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(24), pages 1-15, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:24:p:11214-:d:1548949
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/24/11214/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/24/11214/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Changyun Zhou & Junxi Zhu & Zhuo Chen, 2024. "Fiscal Decentralization, Environmental Regulation, and Green Technological Innovation: Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-17, May.
    2. Chenggang Wang & Danli Du & Tiansen Liu & Xiaohuan Li & Yue Zhu & Wenhui Du & Fan Xu & Mingtong Yan & Junxin Chen, 2024. "Environmental Regulations, Green Technological Innovation, and Green Economy: Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(13), pages 1-23, June.
    3. Magdalena Wróbel-Jędrzejewska & Ewelina Włodarczyk & Łukasz Przybysz, 2024. "Carbon Footprint of Flour Production in Poland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-15, May.
    4. Anna Szafrańska & Grażyna Podolska & Olga Świder & Danuta Kotyrba & Edyta Aleksandrowicz & Agnieszka Podolska-Charlery & Marek Roszko, 2024. "Factors Influencing the Accumulation of Free Asparagine in Wheat Grain and the Acrylamide Formation in Bread," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-19, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Li Huang & Xiaoyu Ji & Tingting Niu & Wanting Ou, 2025. "The Impact of Carbon Information Disclosure Quality on Enterprise Value: Evidence from Chinese Listed Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(2), pages 1-17, January.
    2. Magdalena Wróbel-Jędrzejewska & Anna M. Klepacka & Ewelina Włodarczyk & Łukasz Przybysz, 2024. "Carbon Footprint of Milk Processing—Case Study of Polish Dairy," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-15, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:24:p:11214-:d:1548949. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.