IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i24p11194-d1548504.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluating the Role of Open Innovation and Circular Economy in Enhancing Organizational Performance: Insights from Batik Small and Medium Enterprises in Banyuwangi, Indonesia

Author

Listed:
  • Dana Azizah Rahmat

    (Department of Industrial Engineering, Telkom University, Bandung 40257, Indonesia)

  • Augustina Asih Rumanti

    (Department of Industrial Engineering, Telkom University, Bandung 40257, Indonesia)

  • Muhammad Almaududi Pulungan

    (Department of Industrial Engineering, Telkom University, Bandung 40257, Indonesia)

  • Artamevia Salsabila Rizaldi

    (Department of Industrial Engineering, Telkom University, Bandung 40257, Indonesia)

  • Mia Amelia

    (Department of Industrial Engineering, Telkom University, Bandung 40257, Indonesia)

Abstract

Batik SMEs are key contributors to Indonesia’s heritage and economy. Their inability to fully harness innovative and sustainable practices threatens not only their survival but also their contribution to economic development. However, their path to sustainability is hindered by many limitations in adopting circular economy (CE) principles; a framework widely acknowledged to enhance organizational performance. This study examines and evaluates the application of innovation within Indonesia’s batik SME sector, focusing on the simultaneous impact of open innovation and circular economy principles—an area that has been largely unexplored within this specific sector. Our study analyzes the influence of open innovation and circular economy on organizational performance, measured via simulations among 70 Batik SMEs in Banyuwangi, Indonesia, using Structural Equation Modeling–Partial Least Square (SEM-PLS). The results reveal that while both open innovation and CE enhance performance, some dimensions of CE—such as waste reduction—prove less relevance to the business models of Batik SMEs based on model iteration. Moreover, this includes a discussion about several elimination items within the iteration. These findings suggest that Batik SMEs benefit more from resource optimization and innovation networks than from rigid waste management practices. In conclusion, integrating open innovation with tailored circular economy strategies can improve the operational efficiency and sustainability of Batik SMEs, enabling them to better compete and grow. This research highlights the need for context-specific adaptations of CE principles to ensure their practical impact on different sectors, emphasizing the role of innovation in overcoming resource limitations.

Suggested Citation

  • Dana Azizah Rahmat & Augustina Asih Rumanti & Muhammad Almaududi Pulungan & Artamevia Salsabila Rizaldi & Mia Amelia, 2024. "Evaluating the Role of Open Innovation and Circular Economy in Enhancing Organizational Performance: Insights from Batik Small and Medium Enterprises in Banyuwangi, Indonesia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(24), pages 1-20, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:24:p:11194-:d:1548504
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/24/11194/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/24/11194/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Cheon Yu & Junghoon Park & Yun Seop Hwang, 2019. "How Do Anticipated and Self Regulations and Information Sourcing Openness Drive Firms to Implement Eco-Innovation? Evidence from Korean Manufacturing Firms," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(15), pages 1-21, July.
    2. Ana-Maria Zamfir & Cristina Mocanu & Adriana Grigorescu, 2017. "Circular Economy and Decision Models among European SMEs," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(9), pages 1-15, August.
    3. Phil Brown & Nancy Bocken & Ruud Balkenende, 2020. "How Do Companies Collaborate for Circular Oriented Innovation?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-21, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Marie Briguglio & Leandro J. Llorente-González & Christopher Meilak & Ángeles Pereira & Jonathan Spiteri & Xavier Vence, 2021. "Born or Grown: Enablers and Barriers to Circular Business in Europe," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-20, December.
    2. Mateusz Wielopolski & Willem Bulthuis, 2023. "The Better Building Initiative — a Collaborative Ecosystem Involving All Stakeholders as Catalyst to Accelerate the Adoption of Circular Economy Innovations in the Construction Sector," Circular Economy and Sustainability, Springer, vol. 3(2), pages 719-733, June.
    3. Abderahman Rejeb & Karim Rejeb & Suhaiza Zailani & Yasanur Kayikci & John G. Keogh, 2023. "Examining Knowledge Diffusion in the Circular Economy Domain: a Main Path Analysis," Circular Economy and Sustainability, Springer, vol. 3(1), pages 125-166, March.
    4. Jose García‐Quevedo & Elisenda Jové‐Llopis & Ester Martínez‐Ros, 2020. "Barriers to the circular economy in European small and medium‐sized firms," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(6), pages 2450-2464, September.
    5. Shyaam Ramkumar, 2020. "Influence of Inter-Firm Network Relationships on Circular Economy Eco-Innovation Adoption," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-22, September.
    6. Joaquin Sanchez-Planelles & Marival Segarra-Oña & Angel Peiro-Signes, 2020. "Building a Theoretical Framework for Corporate Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-21, December.
    7. Howard, Mickey & Böhm, Steffen & Eatherley, Dan, 2022. "Systems resilience and SME multilevel challenges: A place-based conceptualization of the circular economy," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 757-768.
    8. Malte Jütting, 2020. "Exploring Mission-Oriented Innovation Ecosystems for Sustainability: Towards a Literature-Based Typology," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(16), pages 1-28, August.
    9. Grigorescu Adriana & Maer Matei Monica Mihaela & Mocanu Cristina & Zamfir Ana-Maria, 2019. "Key drivers and skills need for innovative companies focused on sustainability," Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence, Sciendo, vol. 13(1), pages 717-727, May.
    10. Buyukbalci, Pinar & Sanguineti, Francesca & Sacco, Federica, 2024. "Rejuvenating business models via startup collaborations: Evidence from the Turkish context," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    11. Chen Weijun, 2022. "The Impact of Government Support and Technological Innovation on Enterprise Performance: A Case Study of Guangdong Hi- tech Enterprises," International Journal of Science and Business, IJSAB International, vol. 14(1), pages 196-231.
    12. Nicolae Cristina-Andreea, 2024. "Understanding sustainable purchasing behavior in Romania: Drivers, barriers, and environmental participation," Management & Marketing, Sciendo, vol. 19(2), pages 362-381.
    13. Helen Toxopeus & Elisa Achterberg & Friedemann Polzin, 2021. "How can firms access bank finance for circular business model innovation?," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(6), pages 2773-2795, September.
    14. Vinicius Minatogawa & Matheus Franco & Izabela Simon Rampasso & Maria Holgado & Diego Garrido & Hernan Pinto & Ruy Quadros, 2022. "Towards Systematic Sustainable Business Model Innovation: What Can We Learn from Business Model Innovation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-35, March.
    15. Nathalia Suchek & Mário Franco, 2024. "Inter-organisational Cooperation Oriented Towards Sustainability Involving SMEs: a Systematic Literature Review," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 15(1), pages 1952-1972, March.
    16. Ionica Oncioiu & Anca-Gabriela Petrescu & Florentina-Raluca Bîlcan & Marius Petrescu & Melinda Timea Fülöp & Dan Ioan Topor, 2020. "The Influence of Corporate Governance Systems on a Company’s Market Value," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-15, April.
    17. Agustí Segarra‐Blasco & Mercedes Teruel & Josep Tomàs‐Porres, 2024. "Circular economy and public policies: A dynamic analysis for European SMEs," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(4), pages 3532-3549, May.
    18. Patrizia Ghisellini & Ivana Quinto & Renato Passaro & Sergio Ulgiati, 2024. "Exploring environmental and social performances of circular start‐ups: An orientation and certification assessment," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(4), pages 3222-3241, May.
    19. Zhejun Min & Sukanlaya Sawang & Robbert A. Kivits, 2021. "Proposing Circular Economy Ecosystem for Chinese SMEs: A Systematic Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(5), pages 1-13, March.
    20. Tally Katz‐Gerro & Jordi López Sintas, 2019. "Mapping circular economy activities in the European Union: Patterns of implementation and their correlates in small and medium‐sized enterprises," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(4), pages 485-496, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:24:p:11194-:d:1548504. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.