IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i24p11152-d1547646.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Measuring and Forecasting the Development Concept of the “Green” Macrosystem Using Data Analysis Technologies

Author

Listed:
  • Aleksei I. Shinkevich

    (Logistics and Management Department, Kazan National Research Technological University, 420015 Kazan, Russia)

  • Farida F. Galimulina

    (Logistics and Management Department, Kazan National Research Technological University, 420015 Kazan, Russia)

  • Naira V. Barsegyan

    (Logistics and Management Department, Kazan National Research Technological University, 420015 Kazan, Russia)

Abstract

A research framework is formed by the semantics of the “green” macrosystem, supported by a methodological approach, data analysis, and forecasting, with a focus on the dynamics of transition to a qualitatively new state. The purpose of the work is to develop conceptual provisions and methodological tools for assessing the implementation of the concept of a “green” macrosystem. Applying methods of system analysis, content analysis, formalization, statistical analysis (technologies of knowledge discovery in databases and time series analysis), and discriminant analysis contributed to achieving the goal. As a result of the research, the categorical apparatus of a “green” economy was clarified by outlining narrow and broad approaches to defining the “green” macrosystem; the author’s method of assessing the implementation of the concept of the “green” macrosystem was modified by expanding the list of factors of greening the economic system, transforming the condition of the “green” corridor to calculate the developed dynamic coefficient of transition to the concept of the “green” macrosystem ( DCGM ), and adapting the method to the macrosystem level; the regularities of a transition to the concept of a “green” macrosystem were revealed. The novelty of the study lies in the proposal of an integral DCGM indicator, which avoids the problems of normalization, weighting, and loss of relevant data, incorporates the determinants of the “green” economy (natural resources and pollution), and relies on available data. The formulated provisions develop the theoretical basis on which to transform the macrosystem to the “green” concept and can be taken into account in the implementation’s framework of strategic planning documents for the greening of production and economic systems.

Suggested Citation

  • Aleksei I. Shinkevich & Farida F. Galimulina & Naira V. Barsegyan, 2024. "Measuring and Forecasting the Development Concept of the “Green” Macrosystem Using Data Analysis Technologies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(24), pages 1-19, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:24:p:11152-:d:1547646
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/24/11152/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/24/11152/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wu, Jiaxin & Wang, Pingfeng, 2021. "Risk-averse optimization for resilience enhancement of complex engineering systems under uncertainties," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 215(C).
    2. Bobylev Sergey Nikolayevich & Kudryavtseva Olga Vladimirovna & Yakovleva Yekaterina Yuryevna, 2015. "Regional priorities of green economy," Экономика региона, CyberLeninka;Федеральное государственное бюджетное учреждение науки «Институт экономики Уральского отделения Российской академии наук», issue 2, pages 148-159.
    3. Capasso, Marco & Hansen, Teis & Heiberg, Jonas & Klitkou, Antje & Steen, Markus, 2019. "Green growth – A synthesis of scientific findings," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 390-402.
    4. Joanna Godlewska & Edyta Sidorczuk-Pietraszko, 2019. "Taxonomic Assessment of Transition to the Green Economy in Polish Regions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(18), pages 1-25, September.
    5. Bobylev, S. N. & Kudryavtseva, O. V. & Yakovleva, Ye. Yu., 2015. "Green Economy: Regional Priorities," R-Economy, Ural Federal University, Graduate School of Economics and Management, vol. 1(2), pages 268-279.
    6. Boyd, James, 2007. "Nonmarket benefits of nature: What should be counted in green GDP?," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 61(4), pages 716-723, March.
    7. Yanovski, Boyan & Tahri, Ibrahim & Lessmann, Kai, 2024. "Green transition and macroeconomic stabilization," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 221(C), pages 586-601.
    8. Julen Gonzalez-Redin & Iain J. Gordon & J. Gareth Polhill & Terence P. Dawson & Rosemary Hill, 2024. "Navigating Sustainability: Revealing Hidden Forces in Social–Ecological Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-23, January.
    9. Lin, Aihua & Toma, Pierluigi & Zhang, Minfeng & Fusco, Giulio, 2024. "The green development in China through the lens of complex cybernetics: Insight for a new era," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 208(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. V. R. Bityukova, 2021. "Regional Projection of Environmental Consequences of Crises in the Russian Economy," Regional Research of Russia, Springer, vol. 11(4), pages 656-666, October.
    2. Alexander Melnik & Irina Naoumova & Kirill Ermolaev & Jerome Katrichis, 2021. "Driving Innovation through Energy Efficiency: A Russian Regional Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-19, April.
    3. Irina Grechukhina & Olga Kudryavtseva & Ekaterina Yakovleva, 2016. "Evaluation of the Development of the Renewable Energy Markets in Russia," Economy of region, Centre for Economic Security, Institute of Economics of Ural Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, vol. 1(4), pages 1167-1177.
    4. Beatriz Ferreira & Carla Curado & Mírian Oliveira, 2022. "The Contribution of Knowledge Management to Human Resource Development: a Systematic and Integrative Literature Review," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 13(3), pages 2319-2347, September.
    5. Alexander Melnik & Kirill Ermolaev, 2020. "Strategy Context of Decision Making for Improved Energy Efficiency in Industrial Energy Systems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-28, March.
    6. Elmira Krylatykh & Tatiana Belova, 2018. "Russian Grain Exports in the Context of Regional Economic Policy," Economy of region, Centre for Economic Security, Institute of Economics of Ural Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, vol. 1(3), pages 778-790.
    7. Boris Raj Borgohain & Krishna Kumar Singh, 2022. "An Empirical Analysis Using Machine Learning to Identify Features Influencing the Green Economy of India," Jindal Journal of Business Research, , vol. 11(1), pages 7-23, June.
    8. Ana Maria Bocaneala & Daniel Sorin Manole & Elvira Alexandra Gherasim & Bianca Motorga & Livia Cristina Iliescu, 2024. "European Funding for Sustainable Transport Systems—Influencing Factor of Regional Economic Development in Romania," Economies, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-26, February.
    9. Grechukhina, I. A. & Kudryavtseva, O. V. & Yakovleva, E. Yu., 2016. "Efficiency of Developing Renewable Energy Market in Russia," R-Economy, Ural Federal University, Graduate School of Economics and Management, vol. 2(4), pages 422-431.
    10. Bui Huy Nhuong & Ho Dinh Bao & Le Thanh Ha, 2024. "Embracing Green Foreign Direct Investment in a Journey toward Global Sustainable Economy: An Empirical Approach Using Statistical Analysis," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 14(5), pages 435-446, September.
    11. Enrico Bergamini & Georg Zachmann, 2020. "Exploring EU’s Regional Potential in Low-Carbon Technologies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-28, December.
    12. Hao, Yucheng & Jia, Limin & Zio, Enrico & Wang, Yanhui & Small, Michael & Li, Man, 2023. "Improving resilience of high-speed train by optimizing repair strategies," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 237(C).
    13. Hossein Yousefi & Saheb Ghanbari Motlagh & Mohammad Montazeri, 2022. "Multi-Criteria Decision-Making System for Wind Farm Site-Selection Using Geographic Information System (GIS): Case Study of Semnan Province, Iran," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-27, June.
    14. Song, Yang & Zhang, Zhiyuan & Sahut, Jean-Michel & Rubin, Ofir, 2023. "Incentivizing green technology innovation to confront sustainable development," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 126(C).
    15. H. Spencer Banzhaf & James Boyd, 2012. "The Architecture and Measurement of an Ecosystem Services Index," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 4(4), pages 1-32, March.
    16. Evans, Nicole M. & Carrozzino-Lyon, Amy L. & Galbraith, Betsy & Noordyk, Julia & Peroff, Deidre M. & Stoll, John & Thompson, Aaron & Winden, Matthew W. & Davis, Mark A., 2019. "Integrated ecosystem service assessment for landscape conservation design in the Green Bay watershed, Wisconsin," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 39(C).
    17. Sun, Qin & Li, Hongxu & Wang, Yuzhi & Zhang, Yingchao, 2022. "Multi-swarm-based cooperative reconfiguration model for resilient unmanned weapon system-of-systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 222(C).
    18. Małgorzata Porada Rochoń, 2021. "Convergence in Green Growth as the Key to Fighting Climate Change, 1990–2019," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-11, December.
    19. Siba Sankar Mohanty & Himanshu Mallik, 2022. "Discounting GDP for Pollution, Waste Generation and Natural Resources Depletion: A Comparative Analysis of selected High, Middle and Low income countries," Journal of Studies in Dynamics and Change (JSDC), ISSN: 2348-7038, Voices of Inclusive Change and Expressions- (VOICE) Trust, Dehradun, Uttarakhand, vol. 9(4), pages 13-27, October-D.
    20. Jin, Cheng & Luo, Shuangshuang & Sun, Kehan, 2023. "Energy Resources trade and investments for green growth: The case of Countries in the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:24:p:11152-:d:1547646. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.