IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i24p11025-d1544935.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Measurement of Synergy Management Performance in Prefabricated Building Project Supply Chain

Author

Listed:
  • Wei Liu

    (School of Civil Engineering and Architecture, East China Jiaotong University, Nanchang 330013, China)

  • Zhongyi Feng

    (School of Civil Engineering and Architecture, East China Jiaotong University, Nanchang 330013, China)

  • Xiao Luo

    (School of Civil Engineering and Architecture, East China Jiaotong University, Nanchang 330013, China)

Abstract

Prefabricated building (PB) involves many participating enterprises. Its implementation faces many challenges, mainly in the areas of technology, cost, construction management, management of supply chain (SC), and sustainability. The purpose of synergy management of a prefabricated building project supply chain (PBPSC) is to help the whole SC obtain better benefits. This study establishes a measurement index system from the perspective of green sustainability in terms of cost control, technology, information, reliability of SC, and environmental protection. The COWA-CRITIC ideal point method is used to calculate the subjective and objective combination weights, and a cloud model based on this combination weight is constructed for measurement, which is validated by taking the project of a residential building as an example. The results are compared with those of other measurement models to verify the applicability of the measurement model of this study in the synergy management performance of the PBPSC. The sensitivity of the indexes within the five subsystems is analyzed using the one-way rotation OAT method to allow decision makers to identify the most sensitive indexes. This study shows that the synergy management performance of SC in this project is better. The measurement model used in this study is consistent with the results obtained from other measurement models and is in line with the actual situation. Sensitivity analysis using the one-factor rotation OAT method shows that among the secondary indexes, specialized technical staff is the most sensitive to changes in weights; among the primary indexes, cost control is the most sensitive to changes in weights. This provides a new method for measuring the synergy management performance of the PBPSC. Based on the results of this study, corresponding countermeasures are proposed for the synergy management of the PBPSC, which will provide a reference for the synergy management of SCs with similar projects in the future.

Suggested Citation

  • Wei Liu & Zhongyi Feng & Xiao Luo, 2024. "Measurement of Synergy Management Performance in Prefabricated Building Project Supply Chain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(24), pages 1-24, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:24:p:11025-:d:1544935
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/24/11025/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/24/11025/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rui Guo & Zhenyong Wu, 2023. "Social sustainable supply chain performance assessment using hybrid fuzzy-AHP–DEMATEL–VIKOR: a case study in manufacturing enterprises," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 25(11), pages 12273-12301, November.
    2. Hull, Bradley, 2005. "The role of elasticity in supply chain performance," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 98(3), pages 301-314, December.
    3. Yefeng Guan & Chao Wan & Wei Wang, 2024. "Dual-Channel Supply Chain Coordination Considering Green and Service Inputs," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(15), pages 1-17, July.
    4. Long Zhang & Wuliyasu Bai, 2020. "Risk Assessment of China’s Natural Gas Importation: A Supply Chain Perspective," SAGE Open, , vol. 10(3), pages 21582440209, July.
    5. Bidabadi Zahra Toroghi & Hosseinalipour Mujtaba & Hamidizadeh Mohammad Reza & Mohebifar Amirhossein, 2016. "Supply chain collaboration within the Iranian construction industry," Organization, Technology and Management in Construction, Sciendo, vol. 8(1), pages 1437-1445, December.
    6. Shanda Duan & Xuefeng Li & Xiashi Jiang & Xuxing Huang & Yihao Yang & Han Du & Wuning Xiao, 2023. "Extension Cloud Model and Grey Clustering Evaluation of Enterprise Safety Management System: Based on COWA-CRITIC Combination Weighting," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(22), pages 1-19, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Cattaneo, Andrea & Federighi, Giovanni & Vaz, Sara, 2021. "The environmental impact of reducing food loss and waste: A critical assessment," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    2. Carlo Andrea Bollino & Philipp Galkin, 2021. "Energy Security and Portfolio Diversification: Conventional and Novel Perspectives," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-24, July.
    3. Amir Hossein Sheikh Azadi & Vahid Shamsi Nesary & Omid Kebriyaii & Mohammad Khalilzadeh & Jurgita Antucheviciene, 2023. "Design of a Green Supply Chain Based on the Kano Model Considering Pricing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-20, August.
    4. Tah J.H.M. & Oti A.H. & Abanda F.H., 2017. "A state-of-the-art review of built environment information modelling (BeIM)," Organization, Technology and Management in Construction, Sciendo, vol. 9(1), pages 1638-1654, December.
    5. Hao, Xiaoqing & An, Haizhong, 2022. "Comparative study on transmission mechanism of supply shortage risk in the international trade of iron ore, pig iron and crude steel," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    6. Sun, X.Y. & Ji, P. & Sun, L.Y. & Wang, Y.L., 2008. "Positioning multiple decoupling points in a supply network," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 113(2), pages 943-956, June.
    7. Adenike A. Moradeyo, 2019. "Analysis Of Manufacturing Methods Using Market Demand Dynamics," Review of Business and Finance Studies, The Institute for Business and Finance Research, vol. 10(1), pages 61-76.
    8. Mengyang Chen & Nan Li & Hailin Mu, 2024. "Assessing Risks on China’s Natural Gas Supply under Carbon Peaking Policies from Foreign–Domestic Perspectives," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(4), pages 1-20, February.
    9. Zihui Yang & Qingchun Meng & Zheng Fang & Xiaona Zhang, 2024. "Supply Chain Elastic Strain," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-15, June.
    10. Lyons, Benjamin Frederick & Levin, Michael, 2024. "Cognitive Glues Are Shared Models of Relative Scarcities: The Economics of Collective Intelligence," OSF Preprints 3fdya, Center for Open Science.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:24:p:11025-:d:1544935. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.