IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i24p10826-d1540845.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Dynamic Simulation of Land Use Change and Assessment of Carbon Storage Based on the PLUS Model: A Case Study of the Most Livable City, Weihai, China

Author

Listed:
  • Xudong Li

    (School of Agronomy and Agricultural Engineering, Liaocheng University, Liaocheng 252000, China)

  • Chuanrong Li

    (School of Forestry, Shandong Agricultural University, Tai’an 271018, China)

  • Shouchao Yu

    (School of Agronomy and Agricultural Engineering, Liaocheng University, Liaocheng 252000, China)

  • Lijuan Cheng

    (School of Agronomy and Agricultural Engineering, Liaocheng University, Liaocheng 252000, China)

  • Dan Li

    (School of Agronomy and Agricultural Engineering, Liaocheng University, Liaocheng 252000, China)

  • Jiehui Wang

    (School of Agronomy and Agricultural Engineering, Liaocheng University, Liaocheng 252000, China)

  • Hongxia Zhao

    (School of Agronomy and Agricultural Engineering, Liaocheng University, Liaocheng 252000, China)

Abstract

Analyzing and monitoring land use/cover (LULC) changes is critical for improving regional ecosystem service functions and developing strategies for long-term socio-economic development. Exploring future changes in land use and carbon storage under different scenarios is important for optimizing regional ecosystem service functions and formulating sustainable socio-economic development policies. In the present work, we evaluate LULC changes and carbon storage changes in the Rapid Urbanization Area (RUA) of Weihai City from 2000 to 2020 using satellite images. Using five Landsat images, the spatio-temporal dynamics of the LULC changes were measured, using a supervised classification algorithm of the neural net and the intensity analysis techniques in GIS. The Landsat images from 2000, 2005, 2010, 2015, and 2020 were categorized into five main land use categories in the researched region: urban areas, woodlands, cultivated areas, bare soil, and water bodies. Our results reveal that urban areas, woodlands, and bare soil increased by about 129.63 km 2 (13.29%), 53.07 km 2 (5.44%), and 40.99 km 2 (4.2%) from 2000 to 2020, respectively. On the contrary, the cultivated areas decreased by 218.35 km 2 (22.36%) and the water bodies decreased by 5.44 km 2 (0.56%). To summarize, the conversion of cultivated areas into urban areas has been the most significant transformation in the RUA during the period 2000–2020. Regarding carbon storage, in the study area, it decreased by 14.92 × 10 4 t from 2000 to 2020. Moreover, according to the prediction of the LULC changes for 2030 by the patch-generating land use simulation (PLUS) model, the cultivated areas and carbon storage will continue to decline. The slow increase in woodland brings good ecological benefits. But the sharp reduction in the per capita cultivated areas will bring environmental and socio-economic problems to the RUA. Therefore, it is time to strengthen the implementation of cultivated area protection policy. Monitoring and managing LULC changes are critical for establishing relationships between policy choices, regulatory measures, and future LULC operations, especially because many potential concerns remain in the RUA territories.

Suggested Citation

  • Xudong Li & Chuanrong Li & Shouchao Yu & Lijuan Cheng & Dan Li & Jiehui Wang & Hongxia Zhao, 2024. "Dynamic Simulation of Land Use Change and Assessment of Carbon Storage Based on the PLUS Model: A Case Study of the Most Livable City, Weihai, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(24), pages 1-22, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:24:p:10826-:d:1540845
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/24/10826/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/24/10826/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:24:p:10826-:d:1540845. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.