IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i24p10800-d1540261.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Impact and Mechanism Analysis of Environmental Protection Fee and Tax Reform on the ESG Performance of Heavy Polluting Enterprises

Author

Listed:
  • Xue Guo

    (School of Economics, Wuhan Textile University, No. 1, Sunshine Road, Jiangxia District, Wuhan 430079, China
    Hubei Modern Textile Iindustry Economic Research Center, Wuhan 430079, China)

  • Mengyang Li

    (School of Economics, Wuhan Textile University, No. 1, Sunshine Road, Jiangxia District, Wuhan 430079, China
    Hubei Modern Textile Iindustry Economic Research Center, Wuhan 430079, China)

  • Qingyue Liu

    (School of Economics, Wuhan Textile University, No. 1, Sunshine Road, Jiangxia District, Wuhan 430079, China)

  • Zimo Mao

    (School of Economics, Wuhan Textile University, No. 1, Sunshine Road, Jiangxia District, Wuhan 430079, China)

Abstract

Recently, China has advocated for the comprehensive implementation of the new development concept and the enhancement of the national governance system and capacity, particularly in the area of ecology and environmental management. Environmental fee and tax reform has improved China’s modern environmental governance system and deepened the concept of sustainable development of enterprises. In the background of China’s strong call for green transformation and sustainable development, enterprises, as micro subjects in the operation of the market economy, are obliged to balance the concepts of business operation and sustainable development, and to practice and implement the ESG concept. Using a sample of A-share listed companies in China from 2014 to 2022, we conducted an in-depth analysis of the impact of environmental protection tax reform on corporate ESG performance through the difference-in-differences (DID) empirical approach. The results show that (1) the environmental protection fee and tax reform enhances the ESG performance of heavy polluters, and the impact coefficient is around 1.7 to 2.0. The reform exerts the strongest stimulatory effect on the environmental impact (E), with the stimulatory effect being about five times that of the aspect of social responsibility (S). (2) The environmental protection fee and tax reform enhances the ESG performance of heavily polluting firms by promoting green transformation of firms, investor attention, and the government’s focus on the environment. The impact mechanism passes a series of robustness tests, such as the parallel trend test, placebo test, and exclusion of other policy interferences. (3) The environmental protection fee and tax reform enhances the ESG performance of government-owned heavy polluting firms more than private firms. Among different regions, the ESG performance of enterprises in the central region has witnessed the largest improvement margin, while that of enterprises in the western region has the smallest improvement margin.

Suggested Citation

  • Xue Guo & Mengyang Li & Qingyue Liu & Zimo Mao, 2024. "Impact and Mechanism Analysis of Environmental Protection Fee and Tax Reform on the ESG Performance of Heavy Polluting Enterprises," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(24), pages 1-22, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:24:p:10800-:d:1540261
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/24/10800/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/24/10800/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zohra Dradra, 2024. "Do energy transition and environmental taxation contribute to sustainable development? Evidence from OECD countries," Arab Gulf Journal of Scientific Research, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 42(4), pages 1814-1831, January.
    2. Jiayu Wang & Ke Wang & Xunpeng Shi & Yi-Ming Wei, 2019. "Spatial heterogeneity and driving forces of environmental productivity growth in China: Would it help to switch pollutant discharge fees to environmental taxes?," CEEP-BIT Working Papers 123, Center for Energy and Environmental Policy Research (CEEP), Beijing Institute of Technology.
    3. Aref M. Eissa & Arafat Hamdy & Ahmed Diab, 2024. "Governmental Ownership, Board Gender Diversity, and ESG Performance: Evidence from an Emerging Market," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(16), pages 1-17, August.
    4. Min Maung & Craig Wilson & Xiaobo Tang, 2016. "Political Connections and Industrial Pollution: Evidence Based on State Ownership and Environmental Levies in China," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 138(4), pages 649-659, November.
    5. Xu, Ye & Wen, Shuang & Tao, Chang-Qi, 2023. "Impact of environmental tax on pollution control: A sustainable development perspective," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 89-106.
    6. Lei Xi & Hui Wang, 2024. "The Influence of Green Transformation on ESG Management and Sustainable Competitive Advantage: An Empirical Comparison of Companies in the Pearl River Delta and Yangtze River Delta," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(18), pages 1-21, September.
    7. Sami Ullah & Rundong Luo & Tomiwa Sunday Adebayo & Mustafa Tevfik Kartal, 2023. "Dynamics between environmental taxes and ecological sustainability: Evidence from top‐seven green economies by novel quantile approaches," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(2), pages 825-839, April.
    8. Oren Mooneeapen & Subhash Abhayawansa & Naushad Mamode Khan, 2022. "The influence of the country governance environment on corporate environmental, social and governance (ESG) performance," Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 13(4), pages 953-985, May.
    9. Kong, Lingqian & Li, Zhaoyang & Liu, Biqian & Xu, Kai, 2024. "The impact of environmental protection tax reform on low-carbon total factor productivity: Evidence from China's fee-to-tax reform," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 290(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kun Liang & Zhihong Cao & Sheng Tang & Chunguang Hu & Maomao Zhang, 2025. "Evaluating the Influence of Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) Performance on Green Technology Innovation: Based on Chinese A-Share Listed Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(3), pages 1-32, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xueying Yuan & Lixia Shang & Jinhua Xu, 2024. "Green Financial Policy, Resource Allocation and Corporate Environmental Responsibility," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(15), pages 1-29, July.
    2. Li, Houjian & Tang, Mengqian & Cao, Andi & Guo, Lili, 2024. "How to reduce firm pollution discharges: Does political leaders' gender matter?," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 204(C).
    3. Richard Yeaw Chong Seow, 2024. "Determinants of environmental, social, and governance disclosure: A systematic literature review," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(3), pages 2314-2330, March.
    4. Jin, Jie & Wang, Fan, 2024. "Impact of government support on firm carbon emission efficiency: The transmission channel of green innovation," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    5. Deng, Yuping & Wu, Yanrui & Xu, Helian, 2019. "Political turnover and firm pollution discharges: An empirical study," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 58(C).
    6. Arnone, Massimo & Drago, Carlo & Costantiello, Alberto & Leogrande, Angelo, 2025. "Political Trust in Italy: How Environmental, Social, and Governance Factors Shape Confidence in Parties," MPRA Paper 123494, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    7. Yuping Deng & Yanrui Wu & Helian Xu, 2019. "Environmental Regulation and Export Product Quality: Evidence from Chinese Firms," Economics Discussion / Working Papers 19-14, The University of Western Australia, Department of Economics.
    8. Yuping Deng & Yanrui Wu & Helian Xu, 2022. "Emission Reduction and Value-added Export Nexus at Firm Level," Economics Discussion / Working Papers 22-19, The University of Western Australia, Department of Economics.
    9. Rasmi Meqbel & Mohammad Alta'any & Salah Kayed & Ahmed Al‐Omush, 2024. "Earnings management and sustainability assurance: The moderating role of CSR committee," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(3), pages 1769-1785, May.
    10. Pengsheng Li & Yanying Chen, 2019. "The Influence of Enterprises’ Bargaining Power on the Green Total Factor Productivity Effect of Environmental Regulation—Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(18), pages 1-20, September.
    11. Cao, Yuqiang & Lin, Shaoyan & Li, Mangmang & Shan, Yaowen & Wang, Peipei, 2024. "Green taxes: Productivity effects of tax-based environmental regulations on heavily polluting firms," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 140(C).
    12. Di Dong & Rong Ran & Bingsheng Liu & Jinfeng Zhang & Chengcheng Song & Jing Wang, 2024. "Recentralization and the long‐lasting effect of campaign‐style enforcement: From the perspective of authority allocation," Review of Policy Research, Policy Studies Organization, vol. 41(1), pages 239-275, January.
    13. Wuxin Zhang & Haiying Pan, 2024. "Pursuing Cleaner Skies: A Study on the Impact of China’s Environmental Protection Tax Law on Haze Pollution," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(24), pages 1-23, December.
    14. Xie, Peijun & Jamaani, Fouad, 2022. "Does green innovation, energy productivity and environmental taxes limit carbon emissions in developed economies: Implications for sustainable development," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 66-78.
    15. Akrum Helfaya & Nadeesha Muthuthantrige & Shirley Xu, 2024. "Greening the Workplace: Exploring the Influence of Corporate Sustainability Governance on Corporate Labour Rights in the Case of Indian Listed Companies for the Period of 2010 to 2021," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(10), pages 1-27, May.
    16. Youmeng Wu & Hao Sun & Hongliang Sun & Chi Xie, 2022. "Impact of Public Environmental Concerns on the Digital Transformation of Heavily Polluting Enterprises," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(1), pages 1-19, December.
    17. Zhe Zhang & Xin Wang & Ming Jia, 2021. "Echoes of CEO Entrepreneurial Orientation: How and When CEO Entrepreneurial Orientation Influences Dual CSR Activities," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 169(4), pages 609-629, April.
    18. Susheng Wang & Gang Chen & Xue Han, 2021. "An Analysis of the Impact of the Emissions Trading System on the Green Total Factor Productivity Based on the Spatial Difference-in-Differences Approach: The Case of China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(17), pages 1-18, August.
    19. Weidong Sun & Zhigang Chen & Danyang Wang, 2019. "Can Land Marketization Help Reduce Industrial Pollution?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(12), pages 1-16, June.
    20. Chen, Xiang & Chen, Yong & Huang, Wenli & Zhang, Xuping, 2023. "A new Malmquist-type green total factor productivity measure: An application to China," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 117(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:24:p:10800-:d:1540261. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.