IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i23p10429-d1531877.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Triple Bottom Line Scenario Sites as Boundary Objects for Integrating Diverse Disciplines in Convergent Research

Author

Listed:
  • Alison V. Deviney

    (Science and Technologies for Phosphorus Sustainability Center, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695, USA)

  • Jehangir H. Bhadha

    (Everglades Research & Education Center, Soil, Water, and Ecosystem Sciences Department, University of Florida, Belle Glade, FL 33430, USA)

  • Lucas Crane

    (School of Sustainable Engineering and the Built Environment, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287, USA)

  • Maude Cuchiara

    (Science and Technologies for Phosphorus Sustainability Center, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695, USA
    Department of Materials Science and Engineering, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695, USA)

  • Shwetha Delanthamajalu

    (Department of Sociology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, IL 61801, USA)

  • Luciano Gatiboni

    (Department of Crop and Soil Sciences, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695, USA)

  • Sandra M. Guzman

    (Indian River Research and Education Center, Agricultural and Biological Engineering Department, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, University of Florida, Fort Pierce, FL 34945, USA)

  • Christine Ogilvie Hendren

    (Research Institute for Environment, Energy and Economics, Appalachian State University, Boone, NC 28608, USA
    Geological and Environmental Science, Appalachian State University, Boone, NC 28608, USA)

  • Anna-Maria Marshall

    (Department of Sociology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, IL 61801, USA)

  • Elise Morrison

    (Department of Environmental Engineering Sciences, Engineering School of Sustainable Infrastructure and Environment, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA)

  • Natalie G. Nelson

    (Science and Technologies for Phosphorus Sustainability Center, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695, USA
    Department of Biological and Agricultural Engineering, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695, USA)

  • Jay Rickabaugh

    (School of Public and International Affairs, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695, USA)

  • Rosangela Sozzani

    (Science and Technologies for Phosphorus Sustainability Center, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695, USA
    Department of Plant and Microbial Biology, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695, USA)

  • Paul Westerhoff

    (School of Sustainable Engineering and the Built Environment, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287, USA)

  • Jacob L. Jones

    (Science and Technologies for Phosphorus Sustainability Center, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695, USA
    Department of Materials Science and Engineering, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695, USA)

Abstract

Today’s challenges with sustainability are driven by complexity, lack necessary information, resist straightforward solutions, span multiple scales, and encompass diverse or sometimes conflicting perspectives. To tackle these issues effectively, research organizations need tools that support and accelerate the integration of disciplinary knowledge across both natural and social sciences so that they can explore and execute workable solutions. Boundary objects are tools that can bring diverse perspectives together through a shared point of focus that is meaningful across different groups and perspectives, enhancing communication between them. Here, we introduce a framework to develop Triple Bottom Line Scenario Sites (TBL Sites) as “convergence” boundary objects and intervention testbeds to support a holistic approach to sustainability research within multidisciplinary and multi-institutional organizations. We describe four key criteria used to identify a potential TBL Site: (1) proximity to researchers, (2) a bounded geographic location encompassing a particular ecosystem, (3) an integrated stakeholder network, and (4) access to existing resources. We explain how TBL Sites may be used to assess research impacts on environmental, economic, and social sustainability goals. Finally, we provide examples of aquatic, agricultural, and urban TBL Sites used by the Science and Technologies for Phosphorus Sustainability (STEPS) Center, demonstrating how these boundary objects facilitate convergence across a large multidisciplinary research team to tackle sustainable phosphorus management.

Suggested Citation

  • Alison V. Deviney & Jehangir H. Bhadha & Lucas Crane & Maude Cuchiara & Shwetha Delanthamajalu & Luciano Gatiboni & Sandra M. Guzman & Christine Ogilvie Hendren & Anna-Maria Marshall & Elise Morrison , 2024. "Triple Bottom Line Scenario Sites as Boundary Objects for Integrating Diverse Disciplines in Convergent Research," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(23), pages 1-23, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:23:p:10429-:d:1531877
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/23/10429/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/23/10429/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hickel, Jason, 2020. "The sustainable development index: Measuring the ecological efficiency of human development in the anthropocene," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    2. Alice Cohen, 2012. "Rescaling Environmental Governance: Watersheds as Boundary Objects at the Intersection of Science, Neoliberalism, and Participation," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 44(9), pages 2207-2224, September.
    3. Rahmin Bender-Salazar, 2023. "Design thinking as an effective method for problem-setting and needfinding for entrepreneurial teams addressing wicked problems," Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, Springer, vol. 12(1), pages 1-23, December.
    4. Hirsch Hadorn, Gertrude & Bradley, David & Pohl, Christian & Rist, Stephan & Wiesmann, Urs, 2006. "Implications of transdisciplinarity for sustainability research," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 60(1), pages 119-128, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Qaisar Ali & Sulistya Rusgianto & Shazia Parveen & Hakimah Yaacob & Razali Mat Zin, 2024. "An empirical study of the effects of green Sukuk spur on economic growth, social development, and financial performance in Indonesia," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(8), pages 21097-21123, August.
    2. Paul Stock & Rob J.F. Burton, 2011. "Defining Terms for Integrated (Multi-Inter-Trans-Disciplinary) Sustainability Research," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 3(8), pages 1-24, July.
    3. Idiano D'Adamo & Massimo Gastaldi & Ilhan Ozturk, 2023. "The sustainable development of mobility in the green transition: Renewable energy, local industrial chain, and battery recycling," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(2), pages 840-852, April.
    4. Hametner, Markus, 2022. "Economics without ecology: How the SDGs fail to align socioeconomic development with environmental sustainability," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).
    5. Nicolás Ruiz, Néstor & Suárez Alonso, María Luisa & Vidal-Abarca, María Rosario, 2021. "Contributions of dry rivers to human well-being: A global review for future research," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 50(C).
    6. Chuansheng Wu & Yuyue Li & Lingling Qi, 2022. "Assessing the Impact of Green Transformation on Ecological Well-Being Performance: A Case Study of 78 Cities in Western China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(18), pages 1-21, September.
    7. Mugabe Roger & Liu Shulin & Brima Sesay, 2022. "ICT Development, Innovation Diffusion and Sustainable Growth in Sub-Saharan Africa," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(4), pages 21582440221, October.
    8. Arora-Jonsson, Seema, 2016. "Does resilience have a culture? Ecocultures and the politics of knowledge production," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 98-107.
    9. Vandermeulen, V. & Van Huylenbroeck, G., 2008. "Designing trans-disciplinary research to support policy formulation for sustainable agricultural development," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 67(3), pages 352-361, October.
    10. Katharina Löhr & Christian Hochmuth & Frieder Graef & Jane Wambura & Stefan Sieber, 2017. "Conflict management programs in trans-disciplinary research projects: the case of a food security project in Tanzania," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 9(6), pages 1189-1201, December.
    11. Marco Filippo Torchio & Umberto Lucia & Giulia Grisolia, 2020. "Economic and Human Features for Energy and Environmental Indicators: A Tool to Assess Countries’ Progress towards Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-19, November.
    12. Yelin Dai & Yue Liu & Xuhui Ding & Chundu Wu & Yu Chen, 2022. "Environmental Regulation Promotes Eco-Efficiency through Industrial Transfer: Evidence from the Yangtze River Economic Belt in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(16), pages 1-31, August.
    13. Markus Niehaus & Marian Mocan, 2024. "Cultivating Design Thinking for Sustainable Business Transformation in a VUCA World: Insights from a German Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-21, March.
    14. Frame, Bob & Brown, Judy, 2008. "Developing post-normal technologies for sustainability," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 65(2), pages 225-241, April.
    15. Manuel Rivera, 2013. "Political Criteria for Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) Selection and the Role of the Urban Dimension," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 5(12), pages 1-18, November.
    16. Liu, Wen & Xu, Jiaqi & She, Shengxiang, 2023. "Green economic development by increasing efficiency of natural resource consumption," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 85(PB).
    17. Qian, Yu & Xu, Zeshui & Qin, Yong & Gou, Xunjie & Skare, Marinko, 2023. "Measuring the varying relationships between sustainable development and oil booms in different contexts: An empirical study," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 85(PB).
    18. Xu, Jiaqi & Zhao, Jingfeng & Liu, Wen, 2023. "A comparative study of renewable and fossil fuels energy impacts on green development in Asian countries with divergent income inequality," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 85(PA).
    19. Jungell-Michelsson, Jessica & Heikkurinen, Pasi, 2022. "Sufficiency: A systematic literature review," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 195(C).
    20. Lundgren, Jakob, 2022. "Unity through disunity: Strengths, values, and tensions in the disciplinary discourse of ecological economics," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:23:p:10429-:d:1531877. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.