IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i23p10173-d1526014.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sustainability of Agricultural and Forestry Systems: Resource Footprint Approach

Author

Listed:
  • Yannay Casas-Ledón

    (Environmental Engineering Department, Faculty of Environmental Sciences-EULA Center, University of Concepción, Victor Lamas 1290, Casilla 160-C, Concepción 4070386, Chile
    Water Research Center for Agriculture and Mining (CRHIAM), ANID Fondap, Victoria 1295, Concepción 4070411, Chile)

  • Javiera Silva

    (Environmental Engineering Department, Faculty of Environmental Sciences-EULA Center, University of Concepción, Victor Lamas 1290, Casilla 160-C, Concepción 4070386, Chile)

  • Sebastián Larrere

    (Environmental Engineering Department, Faculty of Environmental Sciences-EULA Center, University of Concepción, Victor Lamas 1290, Casilla 160-C, Concepción 4070386, Chile)

  • Yenisleidy Martínez-Martínez

    (Environmental Engineering Department, Faculty of Environmental Sciences-EULA Center, University of Concepción, Victor Lamas 1290, Casilla 160-C, Concepción 4070386, Chile)

Abstract

Land management is critical for the conservation of natural resources, particularly in agroforestry systems which rely heavily on land productivity and availability. Optimizing land utilization is critical for sustainable biomass production and is a key component of achieving effective, long-term sustainable land management. This study assesses the resource efficiency of agroforestry production systems with a novel exergy-based indicator (ΔEF). The indicator was used in the Biobío and Ñuble regions to assess the resource balance between six agricultural and two forestry production systems. The ΔEF values ranged from positive to negative, with positive values indicating better resource usage and negative values suggesting the opposite. Eucalyptus globulus had higher ΔEF values (18.06–19.5 MJex/m 2 .yr) than Pinus radiata (−2.71 to −1.47 MJex/m 2 .yr), indicating better sustainability due to its high biomass yields and lower harvesting period and resource consumption. Sugar beet, wheat, and potatoes were the most sustainable (8.57–154.6 MJex/m 2 .yr) because of their high yields and less intensive harvesting methods. Disparities in biomass yield, potential net primary production (NPP pot ), and land management intensity drive differences in ΔEF across regions. Our findings enhance the understanding of local and non-local resource efficiency in agroforestry systems, revealing significant drivers to encourage more sustainable land management practices.

Suggested Citation

  • Yannay Casas-Ledón & Javiera Silva & Sebastián Larrere & Yenisleidy Martínez-Martínez, 2024. "Sustainability of Agricultural and Forestry Systems: Resource Footprint Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(23), pages 1-14, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:23:p:10173-:d:1526014
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/23/10173/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/23/10173/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:23:p:10173-:d:1526014. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.