IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i22p9949-d1521195.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Environmental Regulation, Government-Business Relations, and Corporate Green Innovation: Evidence from Low-Carbon City Pilot Policy

Author

Listed:
  • Weiqi Hua

    (Institute of Statistics and Applied Mathematics, Anhui University of Finance and Economics, Bengbu 233010, China)

  • Chenglan Liu

    (Institute of Statistics and Applied Mathematics, Anhui University of Finance and Economics, Bengbu 233010, China)

  • Chunzhong Li

    (Institute of Statistics and Applied Mathematics, Anhui University of Finance and Economics, Bengbu 233010, China)

Abstract

Environmental degradation and economic development have long been seen as incompatible, posing a pressing challenge for society. Government–business collaboration stands as an effective avenue for addressing environmental issues. This paper, using the 2007–2021 Low-Carbon City Pilot (LCCP) program in China as a quasi-natural experiment, explores the impact of governmental environmental regulations on corporate green innovation and examines the moderating role of government–business collusion. The findings indicate that the LCCP policy has effectively promoted corporate green technological innovation, with results remaining robust across various sensitivity tests. Heterogeneity analysis further reveals that the policy’s impact is more pronounced in the eastern regions, state-owned enterprises, and low-tech industries. Moreover, government–business collusion significantly undermines the benefits of green innovation, though this effect is partially alleviated when local government officials are replaced. Under the influence of government environmental regulation, green innovation fosters the sustainable development of enterprises. However, the formation of collusion between government and business diminishes the incentive for companies to take on environmental and social responsibilities. The study enriches the existing literature on environmental policy factors and offers both theoretical and practical insights for the government in formulating relevant environmental policies and promoting corporate green innovation.

Suggested Citation

  • Weiqi Hua & Chenglan Liu & Chunzhong Li, 2024. "Environmental Regulation, Government-Business Relations, and Corporate Green Innovation: Evidence from Low-Carbon City Pilot Policy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(22), pages 1-23, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:22:p:9949-:d:1521195
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/22/9949/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/22/9949/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Du, Kerui & Cheng, Yuanyuan & Yao, Xin, 2021. "Environmental regulation, green technology innovation, and industrial structure upgrading: The road to the green transformation of Chinese cities," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    2. Du, Juntao & Shen, Zhiyang & Song, Malin & Zhang, Linda, 2023. "Nexus between digital transformation and energy technology innovation: An empirical test of A-share listed enterprises," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    3. Jintao Ma & Qiuguang Hu & Weiteng Shen & Xinyi Wei, 2021. "Does the Low-Carbon City Pilot Policy Promote Green Technology Innovation? Based on Green Patent Data of Chinese A-Share Listed Companies," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(7), pages 1-18, April.
    4. Goodman-Bacon, Andrew, 2021. "Difference-in-differences with variation in treatment timing," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 225(2), pages 254-277.
    5. Shuliang Zhao & Linjiao Teng & Jiaojiao Ji, 2024. "Impact of environmental regulations on eco-innovation: the moderating role of top managers’ environmental awareness and commitment," Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 67(10), pages 2229-2256, August.
    6. Liu, Baoliu & Cifuentes-Faura, Javier & Ding, Chante Jian & Liu, Xiaoqian, 2023. "Toward carbon neutrality: How will environmental regulatory policies affect corporate green innovation?," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 1006-1020.
    7. Wang Rongjuan, 2023. "How multiple interactions between policy instruments and the policy environment affect environmental governance efficiency," Energy & Environment, , vol. 34(3), pages 621-639, May.
    8. Chao Tu & Yingfang Shi, 2023. "Market-Incentive Environmental Regulation and the Quality of Corporate Innovation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-17, March.
    9. Rangpeng Liu & Zhuo Yue & Ali Ijaz & Abdalwali Lutfi & Jie Mao, 2023. "Sustainable Business Performance: Examining the Role of Green HRM Practices, Green Innovation and Responsible Leadership through the Lens of Pro-Environmental Behavior," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-20, April.
    10. Chen, Yongyu & Peng, Zihao & Peng, Caodie & Xu, Wanli, 2023. "Impact of new government–business relations on urban digital economy: Empirical evidence from China," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 58(PA).
    11. Zhang, Ling & Berk Saydaliev, Hayot & Ma, Xiaoyu, 2022. "Does green finance investment and technological innovation improve renewable energy efficiency and sustainable development goals," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 193(C), pages 991-1000.
    12. Zhou, Zhifang & Han, Shangjie & Huang, Zhiying & Cheng, Xu, 2023. "Anti-corruption and corporate pollution mitigation: Evidence from China," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 208(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Shang, Hua & Jiang, Li & Pan, Xianyou & Pan, Xiongfeng, 2022. "Green technology innovation spillover effect and urban eco-efficiency convergence: Evidence from Chinese cities," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 114(C).
    2. Sun, Yanming & Shen, Simiao & Zhou, Chuanyu, 2023. "Does the pilot emissions trading system in China promote innovation? Evidence based on green technology innovation in the energy sector," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 126(C).
    3. Zhang, Yongji & Lan, Minghui & Zhao, Yapu & Su, Zhi & Hao, Yu & Du, Heran, 2024. "Regional carbon emission pressure and corporate green innovation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 360(C).
    4. Lizhi Cui & Wang Sun, 2024. "Synergistic Impacts of Clean Energy Demonstration Policy on Air Pollution and Carbon Reduction," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(22), pages 1-25, November.
    5. Chuanjia Du & Chengjun Wang & Tao Feng, 2023. "The Impact of China’s National Sustainable Development Experimental Zone Policy on Energy Transition," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-21, May.
    6. Alsagr, Naif & Ozturk, Ilhan, 2024. "Natural resources rent and green investment: Does institutional quality matter?," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    7. Ai, Hongshan & Mangla, Sachin Kumar & Song, Malin & Tan, Xiaoqing & Zhang, Shangfeng, 2024. "Technology-enabled business model innovation and carbon emission reduction: Evidence from a place-based policy in China," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    8. Bas Scheer & Wiljan van den Berge & Maarten Goos & Alan Manning & Anna Salomons, 2022. "Alternative Work Arrangements and Worker Outcomes: Evidence from Payrolling," CPB Discussion Paper 435, CPB Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis.
    9. Hu, Hui & Qi, Shaozhou & Chen, Yuanzhi, 2023. "Using green technology for a better tomorrow: How enterprises and government utilize the carbon trading system and incentive policies," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    10. Catalina Amuedo‐Dorantes & Francisca M. Antman, 2022. "De facto immigration enforcement, ICE raid awareness, and worker engagement," Economic Inquiry, Western Economic Association International, vol. 60(1), pages 373-391, January.
    11. Anderson, D. Mark & Liang, Yang & Sabia, Joseph J., 2022. "Mandatory Seatbelt Laws and Traffic Fatalities: A Reassessment," IZA Discussion Papers 15843, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    12. Chuan Tian & Guohui Feng & Huanyu Li, 2023. "Empirical Study on the Impact of Urbanization and Carbon Emissions under the Dual-Carbon Framework Based on Coupling and Coordination," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-20, March.
    13. Boubaker, Sabri & Liu, Pei-Zhi & Ren, Yi-Shuai & Ma, Chao-Qun, 2024. "Do anti-corruption campaigns affect corporate environmental responsibility? Evidence from China," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    14. Stefan Bauernschuster & Michael Grimm & Cathy M. Hajo, 2023. "The Impact of Margaret Sanger’s Birth Control Clinics on Early 20th Century U.S. Fertility and Mortality," CESifo Working Paper Series 10421, CESifo.
    15. Fabio Bothner & Annette Elisabeth Töller & Paul Philipp Schnase, 2022. "Do Lawsuits by ENGOs Improve Environmental Quality? Results from the Field of Air Pollution Policy in Germany," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-18, May.
    16. Bhalotra, Sonia & Clarke, Damian & Mühlrad, Hanna & Palme, Mårten, 2021. "Health and Labor Market Impacts of Twin Birth : Evidence from a Swedish IVF Policy Mandate," The Warwick Economics Research Paper Series (TWERPS) 1391, University of Warwick, Department of Economics.
    17. Ran, Qiying & Yang, Xiaodong & Yan, Hongchuan & Xu, Yang & Cao, Jianhong, 2023. "Natural resource consumption and industrial green transformation: Does the digital economy matter?," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    18. Barth, Erling & Davis, James C. & Freeman, Richard B. & McElheran, Kristina, 2023. "Twisting the demand curve: Digitalization and the older workforce," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 233(2), pages 443-467.
    19. Shang, Longfei & Saffar, Walid, 2023. "Employment Protection and Household Mortgage Debt," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 149(C).
    20. Rik Chakraborti & Gavin Roberts, 2023. "How price-gouging regulation undermined COVID-19 mitigation: county-level evidence of unintended consequences," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 196(1), pages 51-83, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:22:p:9949-:d:1521195. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.