IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i22p9904-d1520198.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Impact of Corporate Governance on Firms’ Sustainability Performance: Case Study of BIST 50 Index Companies

Author

Listed:
  • Serhii Lehenchuk

    (Department of Information Systems in Management and Accounting, Faculty of Business and Services, Zhytomyr Polytechnic State University, 10005 Zhytomyr, Ukraine)

  • Iryna Zhyhlei

    (Department of Information Systems in Management and Accounting, Faculty of Business and Services, Zhytomyr Polytechnic State University, 10005 Zhytomyr, Ukraine)

  • Olena Ivashko

    (Faculty of Administration and Social Sciences, University of Economics and Innovation in Lublin, 20-209 Lublin, Poland
    Faculty of Economics and Management, Lesia Ukrainka Volyn National University, 43025 Lutsk, Ukraine)

  • Ihor Chulipa

    (Faculty of Administration and Social Sciences, University of Economics and Innovation in Lublin, 20-209 Lublin, Poland
    Faculty of Economics and Management, Lesia Ukrainka Volyn National University, 43025 Lutsk, Ukraine)

  • Bogdan Wit

    (Department of Information Technology Process Engineering, Lublin University of Technology, 20-618 Lublin, Poland)

Abstract

Purpose: the purpose of this study is to investigate whether corporate governance mechanisms and attributes influence the sustainability performance of companies included in the BIST 50 Index. Results and contributions: Regression analysis showed that there was a significant positive influence of board tenure on sustainability performance and all its types; board size on environmental performance; and a dummy variable for board evaluation externally facilitated and company size on sustainability, environmental, and social performance. A significant negative impact of director attendance at board meetings on social performance was also revealed. This study contributes to the literature on the role of corporate governance in achieving the SDGs for BIST 50 Index companies, highlighting the significant impact of its individual indicators on the achievement of sustainability performance. Methodology: The authors reviewed 45 sustainability reports of BIST 50 Index companies for 2023. Four indices—Sustainability Performance, Environmental Performance, Social Performance, and Corporate Governance Performance Indexes—were developed to characterize sustainability performance and its types based on a content analysis of sustainability disclosures. To analyze the influence of mechanisms and characteristics of the corporate governance system on sustainability performance, eight independent variables were used: board size, number of board meetings, director attendance at board meetings, board independence, board tenure, a dummy variable for board evaluation externally facilitated, a dummy variable for internal auditors present, and a dummy variable for CEO and Chair functions combined. Two control variables, company size and leverage, were used as well. Gap: Today, the scientific literature has no universal approach and understanding of how the corporate governance system should be developed to improve sustainability performance or its individual components. Relevance: Development of a corporate governance system is one of the ways to increase the level of sustainability performance of companies. Impact: The results of the study made it possible to produce several recommendations (expand the number of board members, develop an effective procedure for regular changes of general directors in company boards, introduce independent external control tools in the corporate governance systems of companies) that will lead to the achievement of SDGs 5, 8, 16.

Suggested Citation

  • Serhii Lehenchuk & Iryna Zhyhlei & Olena Ivashko & Ihor Chulipa & Bogdan Wit, 2024. "Impact of Corporate Governance on Firms’ Sustainability Performance: Case Study of BIST 50 Index Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(22), pages 1-15, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:22:p:9904-:d:1520198
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/22/9904/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/22/9904/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mauro Romano & Alessandro Cirillo & Christian Favino & Antonio Netti, 2020. "ESG (Environmental, Social and Governance) Performance and Board Gender Diversity: The Moderating Role of CEO Duality," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-16, November.
    2. Burcu Gurol & Valentina Lagasio, 2022. "Women board members’ impact on ESG disclosure with environment and social dimensions: evidence from the European banking sector," Social Responsibility Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 19(1), pages 211-228, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yuanyang Wang & Yanlin Yang & Chenyu Fu & Zengzeng Fan & Xiaoping Zhou, 2021. "Environmental regulation, environmental responsibility, and green technology innovation: Empirical research from China," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(9), pages 1-21, September.
    2. Fabio Caputo & Rossella Leopizzi, 2021. "Achieving Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) among Walking and Talking," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-4, February.
    3. Mauro Romano & Antonio Netti & Antonio Corvino & Marika Intenza, 2024. "Environmental innovation in healthcare industry: The moderating role of women on board in cost of debt," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(3), pages 1921-1933, May.
    4. Wenyuan Liu & Ting Ren & Weishan Tang, 2021. "Teachers in the Top Management Team and Corporate Social Responsibility," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-23, December.
    5. Shivani Shivhare & V. Shunmugasundaram, 2024. "How Government, Social and Personnel Support Leverage the Sustainability in Start-ups: The Moderating Role of Board Gender Diversity," Indian Journal of Corporate Governance, , vol. 17(2), pages 300-327, December.
    6. Nejla Ould Daoud Ellili, 2023. "Impact of corporate governance on environmental, social, and governance disclosure: Any difference between financial and non‐financial companies?," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(2), pages 858-873, March.
    7. Arnone, Massimo & Leogrande, Angelo, 2024. "The Sustainability of the Factoring Chain in Europe in the Light of the Integration of ESG Factors," MPRA Paper 121342, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    8. Ibrahim Khalifa Elmghaamez & Jacinta Nwachukwu & Collins G. Ntim, 2024. "ESG disclosure and financial performance of multinational enterprises: The moderating effect of board standing committees," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 29(3), pages 3593-3638, July.
    9. Hongyu Peng & Tirapot Chandarasupsang, 2023. "The Effect of Female Directors on ESG Practice: Evidence from China," IJFS, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-20, April.
    10. Tingting Hu & Kun You & Char-Lee Lok, 2025. "State ownership, political connection and ESG performance," Risk Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 27(1), pages 1-33, January.
    11. Khan, Muhammad Arif, 2022. "ESG disclosure and Firm performance: A bibliometric and meta analysis," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 61(C).
    12. Yusuf Babatunde Adeneye & Setareh Fasihi & Ines Kammoun & Khaldoon Albitar, 2024. "Does earnings management constrain ESG performance? The role of corporate governance," International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 21(1), pages 69-92, March.
    13. Siagan, Valentine, 2024. "Gender Balance to The Rescue: Examining The Relationship Between Gender Diversity and Financial Distress in Corporate Settings," Revista Finanzas y Politica Economica, Universidad Católica de Colombia, vol. 16(2), pages 355-374, July.
    14. Aso Abdullah & Sibel Yamak & Anna Korzhenitskaya & Roya Rahimi & Jeanette McClellan, 2024. "Sustainable development: The role of sustainability committees in achieving ESG targets," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(3), pages 2250-2268, March.
    15. Nguyen Vinh Khuong & Vu Tran Trong Tai & Nguyen Thi Phuong Thao & Pham Minh Tuan & Tran Tuan Dung & Vo Tuong Khanh, 2024. "Corporate governance and corporate carbon disclosures: The moderating role of earnings management," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(5), pages 4596-4611, September.
    16. Sonia Boukattaya & Abdelwahed Omri, 2021. "Impact of Board Gender Diversity on Corporate Social Responsibility and Irresponsibility: Empirical Evidence from France," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-14, April.
    17. Hamzeh Al Amosh & Saleh F. A. Khatib & Husam Ananzeh, 2024. "Terrorist attacks and environmental social and governance performance: Evidence from cross‐country panel data," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(1), pages 210-223, January.
    18. Mariasole Bannò & Emilia Filippi & Sandro Trento, 2023. "Women in top echelon positions and their effects on sustainability: a review, synthesis and future research agenda," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 27(1), pages 181-251, March.
    19. Giuseppe Nicolò & Gianluca Zanellato & Benedetta Esposito & Adriana Tiron‐Tudor, 2024. "Cultural dimensions and sustainability disclosure in the banking sector: Insights from a qualitative comparative analysis approach," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(8), pages 8086-8101, December.
    20. Porzio, Claudio & Battaglia, Francesca, 2024. "Analyzing the role of sustainable investor in global systemically important banks and less significant institutions," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:22:p:9904-:d:1520198. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.