IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i22p9872-d1519403.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Integrated Framework for Enhancing Liveability and Ecological Sustainability in UAE Communities

Author

Listed:
  • Mhd Amer Alzaim

    (Engineering Systems Management, American University of Sharjah, Sharjah P.O Box 26666, United Arab Emirates)

  • Mariam AlAli

    (Engineering Systems Management, American University of Sharjah, Sharjah P.O Box 26666, United Arab Emirates)

  • Yara Mattar

    (Engineering Systems Management, American University of Sharjah, Sharjah P.O Box 26666, United Arab Emirates)

  • Fatin Samara

    (Department of Biology Chemistry and Environmental Sciences, American University of Sharjah, Sharjah P.O Box 26666, United Arab Emirates)

Abstract

Urban growth is vast in the United Arab Emirates (UAE) due to economic development, and there is a need to consider liveability and sustainable ecosystems for future urban expansion. Promising strategies for sustainability focus on minimizing a building’s effects on the environment and improving residents’ quality of life, which is important in the desert and when confronting the issues of water and climate change. Sustainable practices that impact the livelihood of people in the UAE include factors such as walkable areas, open space, policing, healthcare, education, housing, and ensuring friendly transport that enhance the overall quality of life of residents in the region. Recognizing and appreciating the UAE’s cultural values is crucial when incorporating these aspects, allowing references to the nation’s character when creating communal areas. The primary research included quantitative surveys of three identified communities, composed of fifty participants each, where the findings indicate partial to full compliance, with 85.7% of the liveability indices being about public transport and green space. Through this analysis, liveability and sustainability principles need to be trialed and incorporated into future urban development to embrace the ecology as well as the inhabitants. To realize these targets, the proposed study adopted a four-part approach. Initially, an analysis of related studies concerning the UAE or the Gulf area was carried out to obtain important liveability and quality-of-life factors. A total of 6 dimensions and 51 indicators were extracted from the literature to inform the next stage. Subsequently, the authors identified and evaluated the design of three chosen communities in various cities in the UAE concerning liveability and sustainability indices. Consequently, a conceptual redesign of a typical community was made, illustrating the improved quality of life and sustainability. Lastly, a survey with respective facets from an urban planning architect and environmental scientist cum environmental economist was conducted to evaluate the practicality of the proposed design. This research gives a comprehensive picture of how liveability and sustainable ecosystem concepts need to be implemented in the UAE urban context and offers a direction to develop lively, context-specific, culturally attached, and sustainable urban environments for the present day and for the future.

Suggested Citation

  • Mhd Amer Alzaim & Mariam AlAli & Yara Mattar & Fatin Samara, 2024. "Integrated Framework for Enhancing Liveability and Ecological Sustainability in UAE Communities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(22), pages 1-34, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:22:p:9872-:d:1519403
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/22/9872/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/22/9872/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chuloh Jung & Jihad Awad, 2023. "Sharjah Sustainable City: An Analytic Hierarchy Process Approach to Urban Planning Priorities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-21, May.
    2. Anthony G. Bigio & Bharat Dahiya, 2004. "Urban Environment and Infrastructure : Toward Livable Cities," World Bank Publications - Books, The World Bank Group, number 15018.
    3. Robert Cervero, 2009. "Transport Infrastructure and Global Competitiveness: Balancing Mobility and Livability," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 626(1), pages 210-225, November.
    4. Ziwei Shu & Ramón Alberto Carrasco & Javier Portela García-Miguel & Manuel Sánchez-Montañés, 2022. "Multiple Scenarios of Quality of Life Index Using Fuzzy Linguistic Quantifiers: The Case of 85 Countries in Numbeo," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-28, June.
    5. Geller, A.L., 2003. "Smart Growth: A Prescription for Livable Cities," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 93(9), pages 1410-1415.
    6. Shilpi Mittal & Jayprakash Chadchan & Sudipta K. Mishra, 2020. "Review of Concepts, Tools and Indices for the Assessment of Urban Quality of Life," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 149(1), pages 187-214, May.
    7. A. Zanella & A. Camanho & T. Dias, 2015. "The assessment of cities’ livability integrating human wellbeing and environmental impact," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 226(1), pages 695-726, March.
    8. Maram Ali & Tarig Ali & Rahul Gawai & Ahmed Elaksher, 2023. "Fifteen-, Ten-, or Five Minute City? Walkability to Services Assessment: Case of Dubai, UAE," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(20), pages 1-24, October.
    9. John Stehlin, 2014. "Regulating Inclusion: Spatial Form, Social Process, and the Normalization of Cycling Practice in the USA," Mobilities, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 9(1), pages 21-41, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Henriques, Alda A. & Camanho, Ana S. & Amorim, Pedro & Silva, Jaime G., 2020. "Performance benchmarking using composite indicators to support regulation of the Portuguese wastewater sector," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).
    2. Petr Iakovlevitch Ekel & Matheus Pereira Libório & Laura Cozzi Ribeiro & Mateus Alberto Dorna de Oliveira Ferreira & Joel Gomes Pereira Junior, 2024. "Multi-Criteria Decision under Uncertainty as Applied to Resource Allocation and Its Computing Implementation," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-20, March.
    3. Yiming Wei & Hongwei Wang & Bo Tan & Mengqi Xue & Yucong Yin, 2022. "Analysis of the Spatial Differentiation and Development Optimization of Towns’ Livable Quality in Aksu, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-16, June.
    4. Mehmet Pinar & Thanasis Stengos & Nikolas Topaloglou, 2022. "Stochastic dominance spanning and augmenting the human development index with institutional quality," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 315(1), pages 341-369, August.
    5. Marianela Carrillo, 2022. "Measuring Progress towards Sustainability in the European Union within the 2030 Agenda Framework," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-23, June.
    6. Yazhou Zhou & Yong Huang & Wenyuan Liu, 2024. "Understanding the Conflict between an Ecological Environment and Human Activities in the Process of Urbanization: A Case Study of Ya’an City, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(15), pages 1-19, August.
    7. P. Topalovic & J. Carter & M. Topalovic & G. Krantzberg, 2012. "Light Rail Transit in Hamilton: Health, Environmental and Economic Impact Analysis," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 108(2), pages 329-350, September.
    8. Fusco, Elisa & Vidoli, Francesco & Sahoo, Biresh K., 2018. "Spatial heterogeneity in composite indicator: A methodological proposal," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 1-14.
    9. Aurel Pera, 2020. "Assessing Sustainability Behavior and Environmental Performance of Urban Systems: A Systematic Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-19, September.
    10. Matthew Cohen, 2017. "A Systematic Review of Urban Sustainability Assessment Literature," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-16, November.
    11. D’Inverno, Giovanna & De Witte, Kristof, 2020. "Service level provision in municipalities: A flexible directional distance composite indicator," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 286(3), pages 1129-1141.
    12. Sunmin Jun & Mengying Li & Juchul Jung, 2022. "Air Pollution (PM 2.5 ) Negatively Affects Urban Livability in South Korea and China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(20), pages 1-20, October.
    13. Beatriz Valcárcel-Aguiar & Pilar Murias & Alexandre Vecino-Aguirre, 2022. "Liveability Versus Sustainability in Spanish Cities: First Evidences Using Synthetic Indicators," Applied Research in Quality of Life, Springer;International Society for Quality-of-Life Studies, vol. 17(4), pages 1935-1960, August.
    14. Kwiatkowski Michał Adam, 2024. "Bicycle critical mass events 30 years on – are they an urban mobility movement or a bicycle festival?," Environmental & Socio-economic Studies, Sciendo, vol. 12(2), pages 28-39.
    15. Kevin T Smiley & Wanda Rushing & Michele Scott, 2016. "Behind a bicycling boom: Governance, cultural change and place character in Memphis, Tennessee," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 53(1), pages 193-209, January.
    16. Yige Sun & Qingshan Yang, 2022. "Study on Spatial–Temporal Evolution Characteristics and Restrictive Factors of Urban–Rural Integration in Northeast China from 2000 to 2019," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-23, July.
    17. Soud K. Al-Thani & Alexandre Amato & Muammer Koç & Sami G. Al-Ghamdi, 2019. "Urban Sustainability and Livability: An Analysis of Doha’s Urban-form and Possible Mitigation Strategies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-25, February.
    18. Mingying Zhu & Anthony Heyes, 2024. "Dreaming of Blue Skies: Evidence on Air Pollution and the Mobility Aspirations of Young People in Beijing from Online Search Behavior," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 87(11), pages 2889-2933, November.
    19. Francisco Benita, 2022. "Associations Between Street Connectivity and Poverty," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 22(1), pages 181-201, March.
    20. Hongzan Jiao & Chengcong Li & Yang Yu & Zhenghong Peng, 2020. "Urban Public Green Space Equity against the Context of High-Speed Urbanization in Wuhan, Central China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-21, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:22:p:9872-:d:1519403. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.