IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i22p9752-d1516801.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Determinants of Microfinance Demand (Evidence from Chiredzi Smallholder Resettled Sugarcane Farmers in Zimbabwe)

Author

Listed:
  • Simion Matsvai

    (Small-Scale Agribusiness and Rural Non-Farm Enterprise Research Niche, Department Business Management and Economics, Faculty of Economic and Financial Sciences, Walter Sisulu University, Private Bag X1, Mthatha 5117, South Africa)

Abstract

Despite the MFI insurgency, agricultural financing remains critically low, even though microcredit is widely accepted as both a substitute and compliment to formal credit. Zimbabwe is an agro-based economy and very little is known about the determinants of microcredit demand and microcredit size in smallholder resettled sugarcane farmers. Research is concentrated in short-term agriculture activities. Thus, this study aims to fill the unattended gap in lagged returns agriculture activities such as sugarcane production which takes at least a year to mature, hence, the greater need for agriculture financing alternatives such as microfinance. The study examined the determinants of both microcredit demand and loan size (magnitude of microcredit participation) by smallholder resettled A2 sugarcane farmers in Chiredzi. Primary data from 370 smallholder resettled sugarcane farmers (214 borrower participants and 156 non-borrower participants) were used. Probit and Tobit regression models were used for data analysis in STATA. Operational costs, interest rate, grace period, and land size significantly affect both the demand for microcredit and microcredit size, while education, household farming assets, extension services, and payback period significantly affect microfinance demand, and risk attitude/perception additionally determine microcredit size. Special microfinance schemes best suitable for the agriculture sector and crop/plant-specific agriculture financing schemes, currency, and macroeconomic stability are the major policy recommendations.

Suggested Citation

  • Simion Matsvai, 2024. "Determinants of Microfinance Demand (Evidence from Chiredzi Smallholder Resettled Sugarcane Farmers in Zimbabwe)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(22), pages 1-21, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:22:p:9752-:d:1516801
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/22/9752/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/22/9752/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Simion Matsvai & Abbissynia Mushunje & Simbarashe Tatsvarei, 2022. "Technical efficiency impact of microfinance on small scale resettled sugar cane farmers in Zimbabwe," Cogent Economics & Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(1), pages 2017599-201, December.
    2. Susan Pendame & Joseph Oscar Akotey, 2023. "The effect of a moveable collateral registry on MSME access to finance: Evidence from Malawi," Cogent Economics & Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 11(1), pages 2163873-216, December.
    3. David R. Mason, 2014. "Who Gets What? Determinants Of Loan Size And Credit Rationing Among Microcredit Borrowers: Evidence From Nicaragua," Journal of International Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 26(1), pages 77-90, January.
    4. Shahab E. Saqib & Mokbul Morshed Ahmad & Sanaullah Panezai, 2016. "Landholding size and farmers’ access to credit and its utilisation in Pakistan," Development in Practice, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(8), pages 1060-1071, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Abera Alemu & Zerhun Ganewo, 2023. "Impact Analysis of Formal Microcredit on Income of Borrowers in Rural Areas of Sidama Region, Ethiopia: A Propensity Score Matching Approach," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 14(1), pages 65-85, March.
    2. Chitralada Chaiya & Sikandar Sikandar & Pichate Pinthong & Shahab E. Saqib & Niaz Ali, 2023. "The Impact of Formal Agricultural Credit on Farm Productivity and Its Utilization in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-14, January.
    3. Gao Yu & Hu Xiang, 2021. "Rural E-commerce development and farmers’ digital credit behavior: Evidence from China family panel studies," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(10), pages 1-21, October.
    4. Shah Johir Rayhan & Md. Sadique Rahman & Kaiyu Lyu, 2023. "The Role of Rural Credit in Agricultural Technology Adoption: The Case of Boro Rice Farming in Bangladesh," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-17, November.
    5. Marup Hossain & Conner Mullally, 2022. "Using evaluation data to predict loan performance among poor borrowers: The case of BRAC’s asset transfer and microcredit programmes," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 40(3), May.
    6. Blanco-Oliver, A.J. & Irimia-Diéguez, A.I. & Vázquez-Cueto, M.J., 2023. "Is there an optimal microcredit size to maximize the social and financial efficiencies of microfinance institutions?," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).
    7. Leite, Rodrigo & Mendes, Layla & Camelo, Emmanuel, 2024. "Innovating microcredit: how fintechs change the field," Journal of Economics and Business, Elsevier, vol. 128(C).
    8. Yasir A. Nasereldin & Abbas Ali Chandio & Maurice Osewe & Muhammad Abdullah & Yueqing Ji, 2023. "The Credit Accessibility and Adoption of New Agricultural Inputs Nexus: Assessing the Role of Financial Institutions in Sudan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-18, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:22:p:9752-:d:1516801. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.