IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i21p9510-d1511896.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Impact Mechanism of the Low-Carbon Pilot Policy on Urban Carbon Emissions in China

Author

Listed:
  • Qian Lv

    (School of Economics and Management, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221116, China
    Business School, Xuzhou University of Technology, Xuzhou 221018, China)

  • Tao Lv

    (School of Economics and Management, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221116, China)

  • Cong Li

    (School of Economics and Management, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221116, China)

  • Cheng Wang

    (School of Economics and Management, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221116, China
    School of Foreign Languages, Huaiyin Normal University, Huai’an 223300, China)

  • Jiguang Shi

    (School of Economics and Management, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221116, China
    Business School, Xuzhou University of Technology, Xuzhou 221018, China)

  • Jing Xie

    (School of Economics and Management, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221116, China)

Abstract

To explore the impact mechanisms of China’s low-carbon pilot policies on urban carbon emissions, this paper employs the propensity-score-matched difference-in-differences (PSM-DID) methodology, in conjunction with a dynamic marginal effect analysis, to examine the mechanisms through which China’s low-carbon pilot policies, initiated in three phases at disparate points in time, influence urban carbon emissions. The analysis is based on urban panel data from 2009 to 2020. The case demonstrates that the low-carbon pilot policies have had a considerable positive impact on the reduction of urban carbon emissions. Improving the efficiency of energy use and promoting the transformation of the industrial structure towards modern services are pivotal to curbing the intensity of carbon emissions. While the impact on the secondary industry is not statistically significant, these policies do have a significant impact on the restructuring of the tertiary industry. Increasing the amount of carbon sink in urban green spaces likewise has no discernible impact on lowering carbon emissions. Consequently, it is recommended that low-carbon technological innovation be further strengthened, including industrial upgrading, energy consumption control, and renewable energy development. Through these strategies, not only can carbon emissions be effectively reduced, they can thereby facilitate the creation of an environmentally friendly and resilient low-carbon city.

Suggested Citation

  • Qian Lv & Tao Lv & Cong Li & Cheng Wang & Jiguang Shi & Jing Xie, 2024. "The Impact Mechanism of the Low-Carbon Pilot Policy on Urban Carbon Emissions in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(21), pages 1-19, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:21:p:9510-:d:1511896
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/21/9510/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/21/9510/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yuantao Yang & Shen Qu & Bofeng Cai & Sai Liang & Zhaohua Wang & Jinnan Wang & Ming Xu, 2020. "Mapping global carbon footprint in China," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 11(1), pages 1-8, December.
    2. Joseph S. Shapiro & Reed Walker, 2018. "Why Is Pollution from US Manufacturing Declining? The Roles of Environmental Regulation, Productivity, and Trade," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 108(12), pages 3814-3854, December.
    3. Wolff, Hendrik, 2014. "Keep Your Clunker in the Suburb: Low Emission Zones and Adoption of Green Vehicles," IZA Discussion Papers 8180, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    4. Wu, Jianxin & Wu, Yanrui & Guo, Xiumei & Cheong, Tsun Se, 2016. "Convergence of carbon dioxide emissions in Chinese cities: A continuous dynamic distribution approach," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 207-219.
    5. Emodi, Nnaemeka Vincent & Emodi, Chinenye Comfort & Murthy, Girish Panchakshara & Emodi, Adaeze Saratu Augusta, 2017. "Energy policy for low carbon development in Nigeria: A LEAP model application," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 68(P1), pages 247-261.
    6. Proque, Andressa Lemes & dos Santos, Gervásio Ferreira & Betarelli Junior, Admir Antonio & Larson, William D., 2020. "Effects of land use and transportation policies on the spatial distribution of urban energy consumption in Brazil," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    7. Wang, Yanan & Yin, Shiwen & Fang, Xiaoli & Chen, Wei, 2022. "Interaction of economic agglomeration, energy conservation and emission reduction: Evidence from three major urban agglomerations in China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 241(C).
    8. Hosein, Ada Shereen & Whale, Jonathan & Simsek, Yeliz & Urmee, Tania, 2023. "Exploring energy policy scenarios to transition to a low carbon economy by 2050: A case study on the Northern Territory of Australia," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 180(C).
    9. Qiansheng Gong & Xi Tang & Xiangyu Wang, 2022. "Can Low-Carbon Pilot City Policies Effectively Promote High-Quality Urban Economic Development?—Quasi-Natural Experiments Based on 227 Cities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-18, November.
    10. Emodi, Nnaemeka Vincent & Chaiechi, Taha & Alam Beg, A.B.M. Rabiul, 2019. "A techno-economic and environmental assessment of long-term energy policies and climate variability impact on the energy system," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 329-346.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hannah Klauber & Felix Holub & Nicolas Koch & Nico Pestel & Nolan Ritter & Alexander Rohlf, 2024. "Killing Prescriptions Softly: Low Emission Zones and Child Health from Birth to School," American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, American Economic Association, vol. 16(2), pages 220-248, May.
    2. Jianxin Wu & Ziwei Feng & Chunbo Ma, 2024. "Promotion Incentives and Environmental Regulation: Evidence from China’s Environmental One-Vote Veto Evaluation Regime," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 87(1), pages 257-286, January.
    3. Qiansheng Gong & Xi Tang & Xiangyu Wang, 2022. "Can Low-Carbon Pilot City Policies Effectively Promote High-Quality Urban Economic Development?—Quasi-Natural Experiments Based on 227 Cities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-18, November.
    4. Yan Wang & Yuan Gong & Caiquan Bai & Hong Yan & Xing Yi, 2023. "Exploring the convergence patterns of PM2.5 in Chinese cities," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 25(1), pages 708-733, January.
    5. LaPlue, Lawrence D., 2022. "Environmental consequences of natural gas wellhead pricing deregulation," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 116(C).
    6. Guo, Shu & Zhang, ZhongXiang, 2023. "Green credit policy and total factor productivity: Evidence from Chinese listed companies," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 128(C).
    7. Francesco Lamperti & Giovanni Dosi & Mauro Napoletano & Andrea Roventini & Alessandro Sapio, 2018. "And then he wasn't a she : Climate change and green transitions in an agent-based integrated assessment model," Working Papers hal-03443464, HAL.
    8. Carozzi, Felipe & Roth, Sefi, 2023. "Dirty density: Air quality and the density of American cities," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 118(C).
    9. Francesco Vona & Giovanni Marin & Davide Consoli, 2019. "Measures, drivers and effects of green employment: evidence from US local labor markets, 2006–2014," Journal of Economic Geography, Oxford University Press, vol. 19(5), pages 1021-1048.
    10. Sharath Ankathi & Zifeng Lu & George G. Zaimes & Troy Hawkins & Yu Gan & Michael Wang, 2022. "Greenhouse gas emissions from the global transportation of crude oil: Current status and mitigation potential," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 26(6), pages 2045-2056, December.
    11. Rebecca J. Davis & J. Scott Holladay & Charles Sims, 2022. "Coal-Fired Power Plant Retirements in the United States," Environmental and Energy Policy and the Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 3(1), pages 4-36.
    12. Zhang, Ming-ang & Lu, Shuling & Zhang, Sihan & Bai, Yanfeng, 2023. "The unintended consequence of minimum wage hikes: Evidence based on firms' pollution emission," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 125(C).
    13. Michael O. Dioha & Nnaemeka Vincent Emodi, 2019. "Investigating the Impacts of Energy Access Scenarios in the Nigerian Household Sector by 2030," Resources, MDPI, vol. 8(3), pages 1-18, July.
    14. Sun, Chuanwang & Tie, Ying & Yu, Lili, 2024. "How to achieve both environmental protection and firm performance improvement: Based on China's carbon emissions trading (CET) policy," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 130(C).
    15. Hamilton, Timothy L. & Wichman, Casey J., 2018. "Bicycle infrastructure and traffic congestion: Evidence from DC's Capital Bikeshare," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 72-93.
    16. Ling-Yun He & Liang Wang, 2019. "Import Liberalization of Intermediates and Environment: Empirical Evidence from Chinese Manufacturing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-15, May.
    17. Wang, Junbo & Ma, Zhenyu & Fan, Xiayang, 2023. "We are all in the same boat: The welfare and carbon abatement effects of the EU carbon border adjustment mechanism," MPRA Paper 118978, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    18. Carvalho, Ricardo L. & Lindgren, Robert & García-López, Natxo & Nyambane, Anne & Nyberg, Gert & Diaz-Chavez, Rocio & Boman, Christoffer, 2019. "Household air pollution mitigation with integrated biomass/cookstove strategies in Western Kenya," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 168-186.
    19. Inácio Araúgo & Randall Jackson & Amir B. Ferreira Neto & Fernando Perobelli, 2018. "Environmental Costs of European Union Membership: A Structural Decomposition Analysis," Working Papers Working Paper 2018-04, Regional Research Institute, West Virginia University.
    20. Jonathan T. Hawkins-Pierot & Katherine R. H. Wagner, 2022. "Technology Lock-In and Optimal Carbon Pricing," CESifo Working Paper Series 9762, CESifo.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:21:p:9510-:d:1511896. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.