IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i20p9064-d1502236.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Impact of Servitization on Employee Satisfaction with Performance Evaluation Systems: A Case Study of China’s New Energy Sector Amid Power Market Reforms

Author

Listed:
  • Qingmin Kong

    (School of Business Administration, Guangxi University, Nanning 530004, China
    School of China Frontier Economic Research Institute, Guangxi University, Nanning 530004, China)

  • Peng Lin

    (School of Business Administration, Guangxi University, Nanning 530004, China)

  • Tingting Gu

    (School of Business Administration, Guangxi University, Nanning 530004, China)

Abstract

This study investigates the mechanisms by which service-oriented transformation affects employee satisfaction with performance evaluation systems within the context of China’s electricity market reform. Using CGN New Energy’s Guangxi Branch as a case study and applying the grounded theory method, the research systematically analyzes employees’ perceptions of fairness, transparency, and career development during the transition from a product-oriented to a service-oriented model, based on in-depth interviews and surveys. The findings reveal that while servitization enhances employee skill development and career satisfaction, it also introduces challenges, such as increased work pressure and the demand for more transparent performance evaluation systems. This study provides valuable insights into optimizing management practices and performance evaluation systems in renewable energy companies, contributing both theoretically and practically to the literature on organizational transformation in the energy sector. These conclusions are not only significant for Chinese enterprises but also offer important reference points for global energy companies undergoing similar transitions.

Suggested Citation

  • Qingmin Kong & Peng Lin & Tingting Gu, 2024. "Impact of Servitization on Employee Satisfaction with Performance Evaluation Systems: A Case Study of China’s New Energy Sector Amid Power Market Reforms," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(20), pages 1-18, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:20:p:9064-:d:1502236
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/20/9064/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/20/9064/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Shao, Yanmin & Chen, Zhongfei, 2022. "Can government subsidies promote the green technology innovation transformation? Evidence from Chinese listed companies," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 716-727.
    2. Xiufeng Zhang & Yan Li & Ke Shi & Yanchao Feng, 2022. "How Do Environmental Technology Standards Affect the Green Transformation? New Evidence from China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(10), pages 1-16, May.
    3. Paul L. Joskow, 2008. "Lessons Learned From Electricity Market Liberalization," The Energy Journal, , vol. 29(2_suppl), pages 9-42, December.
    4. Fatras, Nicolas & Ma, Zheng & Duan, Hongbo & Jørgensen, Bo Nørregaard, 2022. "A systematic review of electricity market liberalisation and its alignment with industrial consumer participation: A comparison between the Nordics and China," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    5. Vandermerwe, Sandra & Rada, Juan, 1988. "Servitization of business: Adding value by adding services," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 6(4), pages 314-324, December.
    6. Shah, Syed Aamir Ali & Jajja, Muhammad Shakeel Sadiq & Chatha, Kamran Ali & Farooq, Sami, 2020. "Servitization and supply chain integration: An empirical analysis," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 229(C).
    7. Erik Lindhult & Koteshwar Chirumalla & Pejvak Oghazi & Vinit Parida, 2018. "Value logics for service innovation: practice-driven implications for service-dominant logic," Service Business, Springer;Pan-Pacific Business Association, vol. 12(3), pages 457-481, September.
    8. Shen, Lei & Sun, Wanqin & Parida, Vinit, 2023. "Consolidating digital servitization research: A systematic review, integrative framework, and future research directions," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    9. Geissinger, Andrea & Laurell, Christofer & Öberg, Christina & Sandström, Christian, 2023. "Social media analytics for innovation management research: A systematic literature review and future research agenda," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 123(C).
    10. Bustinza, Oscar F. & Lafuente, Esteban & Rabetino, Rodrigo & Vaillant, Yancy & Vendrell-Herrero, Ferran, 2019. "Make-or-buy configurational approaches in product-service ecosystems and performance," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 393-401.
    11. Yuk-shing Cheng & Man-kit Chung & Kam-pui Tsang, 2023. "Electricity Market Reforms for Energy Transition: Lessons from China," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-16, January.
    12. Green, Richard, 2006. "Market power mitigation in the UK power market," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 14(2), pages 76-89, June.
    13. Mahendra Singh & Jiao Jiao & Marian Klobasa & Rainer Frietsch, 2022. "Servitization of Energy Sector: Emerging Service Business Models and Startup’s Participation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-20, April.
    14. Ebrahim Navid Sadjadi & Roemi Fernández, 2023. "Relational Marketing Promotes Sustainable Consumption Behavior in Renewable Energy Production," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-18, March.
    15. Guo, Hongye & Davidson, Michael R. & Chen, Qixin & Zhang, Da & Jiang, Nan & Xia, Qing & Kang, Chongqing & Zhang, Xiliang, 2020. "Power market reform in China: Motivations, progress, and recommendations," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 145(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhou, Dan & Yan, Tingting & Zhao, Lilong & Guo, Jingjing, 2020. "Performance implications of servitization: Does a Manufacturer's service supply network matter?," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 219(C), pages 31-42.
    2. Alberto de la Calle & Inmaculada Freije & Aitor Oyarbide, 2021. "Digital Product–Service Innovation and Sustainability: A Multiple-Case Study in the Capital Goods Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-29, June.
    3. Li, Ai Qiang & Kumar, Maneesh & Claes, Björn & Found, Pauline, 2020. "The state-of-the-art of the theory on Product-Service Systems," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 222(C).
    4. Sehrish Atif, 2023. "Mapping circular economy principles and servitisation approach in business model canvas: an integrated literature review," Future Business Journal, Springer, vol. 9(1), pages 1-21, December.
    5. Bustinza, Oscar F. & Opazo-Basaez, Marco & Tarba, Shlomo, 2022. "Exploring the interplay between Smart Manufacturing and KIBS firms in configuring product-service innovation performance," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 118(C).
    6. Sherzod N. Tashpulatov, 2018. "The Impact of Behavioral and Structural Remedies on Electricity Prices: The Case of the England and Wales Electricity Market," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-24, December.
    7. Saad Zighan & Moheeb Abualqumboz, 2022. "Dual focus: service-product orientation to manage the change paradox following servitization strategy," Service Business, Springer;Pan-Pacific Business Association, vol. 16(1), pages 29-55, March.
    8. Simshauser, Paul & Tian, Yuan & Whish-Wilson, Patrick, 2015. "Vertical integration in energy-only electricity markets," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 35-56.
    9. Yao Li & Siyuan Ni & Xi Tang & Sizhe Xie & Peng Wang, 2024. "Analysis of EU’s Coupled Carbon and Electricity Market Development Based on Generative Pre-Trained Transformer Large Model and Implications in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(23), pages 1-18, December.
    10. Ornella Benedettini, 2022. "Structuring Servitization-Related Capabilities: A Data-Driven Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-20, May.
    11. Ying Wang & Martin Agyemang & Fu Jia, 2021. "Resource Orchestration in Supply Chain Service-Based Business Model: The Case of a Cross-Border E-Commerce Company," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-24, October.
    12. Jovanovic, Marin & Raja, Jawwad Z. & Visnjic, Ivanka & Wiengarten, Frank, 2019. "Paths to service capability development for servitization: Examining an internal service ecosystem," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 472-485.
    13. Tashpulatov, Sherzod N., 2015. "Analysis of electricity industry liberalization in Great Britain: How did the bidding behavior of electricity producers change?," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(C), pages 24-34.
    14. Wei, Zelong & Huang, Wengao & Wang, Yanping & Sun, Lulu, 2022. "When does servitization promote product innovation? The moderating roles of product modularization and organization formalization," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 117(C).
    15. Behl, Abhishek & Sampat, Brinda & Gaur, Jighyasu & Pereira, Vijay & Laker, Benjamin & Shankar, Amit & Shi, Yangyan & Roohanifar, Mohammad, 2024. "Can gamification help green supply chain management firms achieve sustainable results in servitized ecosystem? An empirical investigation," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 129(C).
    16. Lombardi, Silvia & Santini, Erica & Vecciolini, Claudia, 2022. "Drivers of territorial servitization: An empirical analysis of manufacturing productivity in local value chains," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 253(C).
    17. Wang, Yanping & Gao, Jie & Wei, Zelong, 2022. "The double-edged sword of servitization in radical product innovation: The role of latent needs identification," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 118(C).
    18. Kapoor, Kawaljeet & Bigdeli, Ali Ziaee & Schroeder, Andreas & Baines, Tim, 2022. "A platform ecosystem view of servitization in manufacturing," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 118(C).
    19. Wim Coreynen & Arjen van Witteloostuijn & Johanna Vanderstraeten, 2021. "Toward Servitized Research: An Integrated Approach for Sustainable Product-Service Innovation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-21, July.
    20. Paolo Gaiardelli & Giuditta Pezzotta & Alice Rondini & David Romero & Farnaz Jarrahi & Marco Bertoni & Stefan Wiesner & Thorsten Wuest & Tobias Larsson & Mohamed Zaki & Philipp Jussen & Xavier Boucher, 2021. "Product-service systems evolution in the era of Industry 4.0," Service Business, Springer;Pan-Pacific Business Association, vol. 15(1), pages 177-207, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:20:p:9064-:d:1502236. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.