IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i20p9053-d1502127.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Measuring the Digital Maturity of Organisations in the People Care Sector

Author

Listed:
  • Nikola Kadoić

    (University of Zagreb Faculty of Organization and Informatics, University of Zagreb, Pavlinska 2, 42000 Varaždin, Croatia)

  • Teresa Monllau Jaques

    (Department of Economic and Business, Pompeu Fabra University, Ramon Trias Fargas 25-27, 08005 Barcelona, Spain)

  • Jaime Lacueva Rueda

    (Tandem Social SCCL, Premià 15, 2a Planta, 08014 Barcelona, Spain)

Abstract

This study focuses on the organisations in the people care sector (OPCs), encompassing a broad spectrum of activities ranging from essential healthcare services to various aspects of daily living support. Sustainability in OPCs encompasses multiple dimensions aimed at ensuring the long-term viability, efficiency, and effectiveness of services provided to vulnerable populations. Given the critical role of digital technologies in enhancing the operational efficiency within such organisations and their sustainability, it becomes imperative to gauge their digital maturity levels. To establish a robust framework for assessing the digital maturity of OPCs, we identified 29 factors grouped into five clusters that encapsulate various dimensions of digital readiness that directly influence the sustainability of OPCs. We employed the SNAP methodology to ascertain the relative significance of these factors and clusters. Furthermore, each factor was articulated through the lens of digital maturity using the rubrics approach, offering a nuanced understanding of the OPCs’ digital readiness across four distinct levels. Experts from the people care sector, IT, and multi-criteria decision-making contributed invaluable input during the instrument’s development phase. Theoretical validation of the instrument involved focus group discussions with domain experts, while practical validation entailed applying the instrument to real-world case studies. The instrument enables OPCs to assess their digital maturity levels, providing valuable strategic planning and decision-making insights. Furthermore, the instrument can serve as a roadmap for identifying areas ripe for digital transformation and weak points, facilitating continuous improvement and future readiness. The quantification of the digital maturity of the OPC enables the OPCs to rank at the cluster maturity level and overall maturity level. Overall, this instrument represents a significant step towards enhancing digital maturity assessment within the OPC sector, contributing to its evolution and adaptation in the digital age, and enabling the OPCs’ sustainability.

Suggested Citation

  • Nikola Kadoić & Teresa Monllau Jaques & Jaime Lacueva Rueda, 2024. "Measuring the Digital Maturity of Organisations in the People Care Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(20), pages 1-28, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:20:p:9053-:d:1502127
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/20/9053/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/20/9053/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Timo Neunaber & Sven Meister, 2023. "Digital Maturity and Its Measurement of General Practitioners: A Scoping Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(5), pages 1-18, February.
    2. Panagiotis Kampylis & Yves Punie & Jim Devine, 2015. "Promoting Effective Digital-Age Learning - A European Framework for Digitally-Competent Educational Organisations," JRC Research Reports JRC98209, Joint Research Centre.
    3. Nambisan, Satish & Wright, Mike & Feldman, Maryann, 2019. "The digital transformation of innovation and entrepreneurship: Progress, challenges and key themes," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(8), pages 1-1.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Weking, Jörg & Desouza, Kevin C. & Fielt, Erwin & Kowalkiewicz, Marek, 2023. "Metaverse-enabled entrepreneurship," Journal of Business Venturing Insights, Elsevier, vol. 19(C).
    2. Magnus Schückes & Tobias Gutmann, 2021. "Why do startups pursue initial coin offerings (ICOs)? The role of economic drivers and social identity on funding choice," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 57(2), pages 1027-1052, August.
    3. Muhammad Farooq Islam & Ozge Can, 2024. "Integrating digital and sustainable entrepreneurship through business models: a bibliometric analysis," Journal of Global Entrepreneurship Research, Springer;UNESCO Chair in Entrepreneurship, vol. 14(1), pages 1-18, December.
    4. Jin, Laiqun & Dai, Jiaying & Jiang, Weijie & Cao, Kairui, 2023. "Digital finance and misallocation of resources among firms: Evidence from China," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).
    5. Jinqiu He & Huiwen Su, 2022. "Digital Transformation and Green Innovation of Chinese Firms: The Moderating Role of Regulatory Pressure and International Opportunities," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(20), pages 1-21, October.
    6. Stefano D’Angelo & Angelo Cavallo & Antonio Ghezzi & Francesco Di Lorenzo, 2024. "Understanding corporate entrepreneurship in the digital age: a review and research agenda," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 18(12), pages 3719-3774, December.
    7. Jean-Michel Sahut & Luca Iandoli & Frédéric Teulon, 2021. "The age of digital entrepreneurship," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 56(3), pages 1159-1169, February.
    8. Allen, Darcy W.E. & Berg, Chris & Markey-Towler, Brendan & Novak, Mikayla & Potts, Jason, 2020. "Blockchain and the evolution of institutional technologies: Implications for innovation policy," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 49(1).
    9. Cong Cheng & Hongfang Cui, 2024. "Combining digital and legacy technologies: firm digital transformation strategies—evidence from Chinese manufacturing companies," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-14, December.
    10. Yuzhuo Cai & Borja Ramis Ferrer & Jose Luis Martinez Lastra, 2019. "Building University-Industry Co-Innovation Networks in Transnational Innovation Ecosystems: Towards a Transdisciplinary Approach of Integrating Social Sciences and Artificial Intelligence," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(17), pages 1-23, August.
    11. Satish Nambisan & Yadong Luo, 2021. "Toward a loose coupling view of digital globalization," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 52(8), pages 1646-1663, October.
    12. Hua Zhang & Qiwang Zhang, 2023. "How Does Digital Transformation Facilitate Enterprise Total Factor Productivity? The Multiple Mediators of Supplier Concentration and Customer Concentration," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-18, January.
    13. Chenglei Xu & Shuxin Zhu & Boru Yang & Bin Miao & Yi Duan, 2023. "A Review of Policy Framework Research on Promoting Sustainable Transformation of Digital Innovation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-26, April.
    14. Naudé, Wim & Liebregts, Werner, 2020. "Digital Entrepreneurship Research: A Concise Introduction," IZA Discussion Papers 13667, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    15. Gala, Kaushik & Schwab, Andreas & Mueller, Brandon A., 2024. "Star entrepreneurs on digital platforms: Heavy-tailed performance distributions and their generative mechanisms," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 39(1).
    16. Md Nazrul Islam & Md Mofazzal Hossain & Md Shafayet Shahed Ornob, 2024. "Business research on Industry 4.0: a systematic review using topic modelling approach," Future Business Journal, Springer, vol. 10(1), pages 1-15, December.
    17. Ren, Xiaohang & Zeng, Gudian & Zhao, Yang, 2023. "Digital finance and corporate ESG performance: Empirical evidence from listed companies in China," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    18. Elias G. Carayannis & David F. J. Campbell, 2021. "Democracy of Climate and Climate for Democracy: the Evolution of Quadruple and Quintuple Helix Innovation Systems," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 12(4), pages 2050-2082, December.
    19. Kroh, Julia & Globocnik, Dietfried & Schultz, Carsten & Holdhof, Frederike & Salomo, Søren, 2024. "Micro-foundations of digital innovation capability – A mixed method approach to develop and validate a multi-dimensional measurement instrument," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 198(C).
    20. Wei Zhou & Zidong Wang, 2020. "Competing for Search Traffic in Query Markets: Entry Strategy, Platform Design, and Entrepreneurship," Working Papers 20-12, NET Institute.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:20:p:9053-:d:1502127. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.