IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i20p8908-d1498702.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Applying an Extended Theory of Planned Behavior to Predict Young Drivers’ In-Vehicle Information System (IVIS) Use Intention and Behavior While Driving: A Longitudinal Two-Wave Survey

Author

Listed:
  • Qi Zhong

    (Department of Industrial Design, School of Design, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu 611756, China)

  • Jinyi Zhi

    (Department of Industrial Design, School of Design, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu 611756, China)

  • Yongsheng Xu

    (Department of Industrial Design, School of Design, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu 611756, China)

  • Pengfei Gao

    (Department of Industrial Design, School of Design, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu 611756, China)

  • Shu Feng

    (Department of Industrial Design, School of Design, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu 611756, China)

Abstract

In-vehicle information system (IVIS) use while driving has raised concerns about driver distraction, especially for young drivers. To understand better their psychological factors, an extended theory of planned behavior (TPB) was employed to predict young drivers’ IVIS use intentions and behavior while driving. A two-wave longitudinal survey was conducted to explore the temporal effects of ‘intention–behavior’ causality. At Time 1, 236 qualified participants completed a main questionnaire assessing the standard TPB constructs (attitude, subjective norms, and perceived behavior control) and the extended constructs (descriptive norms, moral norms, and perceived risks). At Time 2, 145 follow-up questionnaires measuring self-reported behavior were successfully administered. The hierarchical multiple regression analyses showed that the standard constructs account for 36.5% of the intention variance and 41.2% of the behavior variance. The extended constructs additionally contributed 20.3% of intention variance. All variables were identified as significant predictors of intentions, except for perceived crash risks and perceived risks of being caught and fined. The sole significant predictor of prospective behavior was intention. Theoretically, the findings further support the efficacy of the TPB in explaining IVIS use while driving. Practically, it is helpful to design non-legal interventions that sustainably reduce young drivers’ engagement in IVIS-related distractions.

Suggested Citation

  • Qi Zhong & Jinyi Zhi & Yongsheng Xu & Pengfei Gao & Shu Feng, 2024. "Applying an Extended Theory of Planned Behavior to Predict Young Drivers’ In-Vehicle Information System (IVIS) Use Intention and Behavior While Driving: A Longitudinal Two-Wave Survey," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(20), pages 1-17, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:20:p:8908-:d:1498702
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/20/8908/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/20/8908/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jiang, Kang & Ling, Feiyang & Feng, Zhongxiang & Wang, Kun & Shao, Cheng, 2017. "Why do drivers continue driving while fatigued? An application of the theory of planned behaviour," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 141-149.
    2. Kim, Junghwan & Kim, Seongcheol & Nam, Changi, 2016. "User resistance to acceptance of In-Vehicle Infotainment (IVI) systems," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 40(9), pages 919-930.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chen, Chia-Chen & Chang, Chin-Hsuan & Hsiao, Kuo-Lun, 2022. "Exploring the factors of using mobile ticketing applications: Perspectives from innovation resistance theory," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    2. Liping Pang & Pei Li & Liang Guo & Xin Wang & Hongquan Qu, 2022. "Prediction Method of Human Fatigue in an Artificial Atmospheric Environment Based on Dynamic Bayesian Network," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(15), pages 1-13, August.
    3. Zhiyuan Yu & Doudou Jin, 2021. "Determinants of Users’ Attitude and Intention to Intelligent Connected Vehicle Infotainment in the 5G-V2X Mobile Ecosystem," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(19), pages 1-19, September.
    4. Wei Luo & Silong Wei & Yi Wang & Pengpeng Jiao, 2023. "People’s Intentions to Use Shared Autonomous Vehicles: An Extended Theory of Planned Behavior Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-17, August.
    5. Liu, Yu-li & Yan, Wenjia & Hu, Bo, 2021. "Resistance to facial recognition payment in China: The influence of privacy-related factors," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(5).
    6. Muhammad A. Saleem & Hina Ismail & Rao Akmal Ali, 2021. "Actions Speak Louder than Words: Investigating the Interplay between Descriptive and Injunctive Norms to Promote Alternative Fuel Vehicles," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-17, August.
    7. Xiaoxiao Wang & Liangjie Xu, 2021. "Factors Influencing Young Drivers’ Willingness to Engage in Risky Driving Behavior: Continuous Lane-Changing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-18, June.
    8. Bircan Arslannur & Ahmet Tortum, 2023. "Public Transport Modeling for Commuting in Cities with Different Development Levels Using Extended Theory of Planned Behavior," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-24, August.
    9. Longhai Yang & Xiqiao Zhang & Xiaoyan Zhu & Yule Luo & Yi Luo, 2019. "Research on Risky Driving Behavior of Novice Drivers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(20), pages 1-20, October.
    10. Weiwei Qi & Shufang Zhu & Wanqing Long, 2023. "Exploring the factors that affect the defensive driving behavior of bus drivers: the application of TPB and PMT theories," Public Transport, Springer, vol. 15(1), pages 227-251, March.
    11. Yunteng Chen & Xianyong Liu & Jinliang Xu & Huan Liu, 2022. "Underestimated Risk Perception Characteristics of Drivers Based on Extended Theory of Planned Behavior," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(5), pages 1-19, February.
    12. Liyuan Deng & Dongning Li & Jiangjie Chen, 2023. "Compatibility as a Prerequisite: Research on the Factors Influencing the Continuous Use Intention of In-vehicle Games Based on Diffusion of Innovations Theory," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(4), pages 21582440231, December.
    13. Debbie Hopkins & Enrique García Bengoechea & Sandra Mandic, 2021. "Adolescents and their aspirations for private car-based transport," Transportation, Springer, vol. 48(1), pages 67-93, February.
    14. Park, Jiyoun & Nam, Changi & Kim, Hye-jin & Kim, Seongcheol, 2018. "What are the relative importance of smart car utilities from consumer perspective and who will lead them?," 22nd ITS Biennial Conference, Seoul 2018. Beyond the boundaries: Challenges for business, policy and society 190334, International Telecommunications Society (ITS).
    15. Huang, Dan & Jin, Xin & Coghlan, Alexandra, 2021. "Advances in consumer innovation resistance research: A review and research agenda," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 166(C).
    16. Park, Jiyoun & Nam, Changi & Kim, Hye-jin, 2019. "Exploring the key services and players in the smart car market," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 43(10).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:20:p:8908-:d:1498702. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.