IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i20p8761-d1495869.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Optimal Site Selection for Solar PV Systems in the Colombian Caribbean: Evaluating Weighting Methods in a TOPSIS Framework

Author

Listed:
  • Carlos Robles-Algarín

    (Facultad de Ingeniería, Universidad del Magdalena, Santa Marta 470003, Colombia)

  • Luis Castrillo-Fernández

    (Facultad de Ingeniería, Universidad del Magdalena, Santa Marta 470003, Colombia)

  • Diego Restrepo-Leal

    (Facultad de Ingeniería, Universidad Cooperativa de Colombia, Santa Marta 470002, Colombia)

Abstract

This research paper proposes a framework utilizing multicriteria tools for optimal site selection of photovoltaic solar farms. A comparative analysis was conducted using three quantitative methods—CRITIC (criteria importance through intercriteria correlation), PCA (principal component analysis), and entropy—to obtain the weights for the selection process. The evaluation considered environmental, demographic, financial, meteorological, and performance system criteria. TOPSIS (technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution) was employed to rank the alternatives based on their proximity to the ideal positive solution and distance from the ideal negative solution. The capital cities of the seven departments in the Colombian Caribbean region were selected for the assessment, characterized by high annual solar radiation, to evaluate the suitability of the proposed decision-making framework. The results demonstrated that Barranquilla consistently ranked in the top two across all methods, indicating its strong performance. Cartagena, for instance, fluctuated between first and third place, showing some stability but still influenced by the method used. In contrast, Sincelejo consistently ranked among the lowest positions. A sensitivity analysis with equal weight distribution confirmed the top-performing cities, though it also highlighted that the weight assignment method impacted the final rankings. Choosing the appropriate method for weight calculation depended on factors such as the diversity and interdependence of criteria, the availability of reliable data, and the desired sensitivity of the results. For instance, CRITIC captured inter-criteria correlation, while PCA focused on reducing dimensionality, and entropy emphasized the variability of information.

Suggested Citation

  • Carlos Robles-Algarín & Luis Castrillo-Fernández & Diego Restrepo-Leal, 2024. "Optimal Site Selection for Solar PV Systems in the Colombian Caribbean: Evaluating Weighting Methods in a TOPSIS Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(20), pages 1-21, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:20:p:8761-:d:1495869
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/20/8761/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/20/8761/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Juan Jose Cabello Eras & Milen Balbis Morej n & Alexis Sagastume Guti rrez & Aldo Pardo Garc a & Mario Cabello Ulloa & Francisco Javier Rey Mart nez & Juan Gabriel Rueda-Bayona, 2019. "A look to the Electricity Generation from Non-Conventional Renewable Energy Sources in Colombia," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 9(1), pages 15-25.
    2. Syed Hammad Mian & Khaja Moiduddin & Hisham Alkhalefah & Mustufa Haider Abidi & Faraz Ahmed & Faraz Hussain Hashmi, 2023. "Mechanisms for Choosing PV Locations That Allow for the Most Sustainable Usage of Solar Energy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-24, February.
    3. Christian Manuel Moreno Rocha & Jose Ricardo Nunez Alvarez & Daniel A. Diaz Castillo & Esnaider D. Florian Domingue & Juan Camilo Barrera Hernandez, 2022. "Implementation of the Hierarchical Analytical Process in the Selection of the Best Source of Renewable Energy in the Colombian Caribbean Region," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 12(2), pages 111-119, March.
    4. Sultan Al-Shammari & Wonsuk Ko & Essam A. Al Ammar & Majed A. Alotaibi & Hyeong-Jin Choi, 2021. "Optimal Decision-Making in Photovoltaic System Selection in Saudi Arabia," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-18, January.
    5. Imad Hassan & Ibrahim Alhamrouni & Nurul Hanis Azhan, 2023. "A CRITIC–TOPSIS Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Approach for Optimum Site Selection for Solar PV Farm," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(10), pages 1-26, May.
    6. Yılmaz, Kutay & Dinçer, Ali Ersin & Ayhan, Elif N., 2023. "Exploring flood and erosion risk indices for optimal solar PV site selection and assessing the influence of topographic resolution," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 216(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tomislav Sunko & Marko Mladineo & Mirjana Kovačić & Toni Mišković, 2024. "Multi-Criteria Analysis of Coast Guard Resource Deployment for Improvement of Maritime Safety and Environmental Protection: Case Study of Eastern Adriatic Sea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-17, August.
    2. Michel Dur n Contreras & Rodrigo Sequeda Barros & Jorlany Zapata & Marley Vanegas Chamorro & Alberto Albis Arrieta, 2020. "A Look to the Biogas Generation from Organic Wastes in Colombia," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 10(5), pages 248-254.
    3. Shasha Chai & Fanjie Kong & Yu Liu & Mengyin Liang & Quanfeng Liu, 2024. "Photovoltaic Solar Farms Site Selection through “Policy Constraints–Construction Suitability”: A Case Study of Qilian County, Qinghai," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-20, September.
    4. Amjad Ali, 2023. "Transforming Saudi Arabia’s Energy Landscape towards a Sustainable Future: Progress of Solar Photovoltaic Energy Deployment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-21, May.
    5. Alexis Sagastume & Jorge M. Mendoza & Juan J. Cabello & Jes s D. Rhenals, 2021. "The Available Waste-to-energy Potential from Agricultural Wastes in the Department of C rdoba, Colombia," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 11(3), pages 44-50.
    6. Bera, Ranajit & Mishra, Pulak & Patnaik, Priyadarshi, 2024. "Renewable energy for women empowerment: Experiences from rural West Bengal," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 198(C).
    7. Adam Kaizer & Tomasz Neumann, 2021. "The Model of Support for the Decision-Making Process, While Organizing Dredging Works in the Ports," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-15, May.
    8. Cabello Eras, Juan José & Mendoza Fandiño, Jorge Mario & Sagastume Gutiérrez, Alexis & Rueda Bayona, Juan Gabriel & Sofan German, Stiven Javier, 2022. "The inequality of electricity consumption in Colombia. Projections and implications," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 249(C).
    9. Alicja Lenarczyk & Marcin Jaskólski & Paweł Bućko, 2022. "The Application of a Multi-Criteria Decision-Making for Indication of Directions of the Development of Renewable Energy Sources in the Context of Energy Policy," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(24), pages 1-21, December.
    10. Juan Camilo Barrera Hern ndez & Christian Moreno & Adalberto Ospino-Castro & Carlos Arturo Robles-Algarin & Juan Tob n-Perez, 2021. "A Hybrid Energy Solution for the Sustainable Electricity Supply of an Irrigation System in a Rural Area of Zona Bananera, Colombia," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 11(4), pages 521-528.
    11. Syed Hammad Mian & Khaja Moiduddin & Hisham Alkhalefah & Mustufa Haider Abidi & Faraz Ahmed & Faraz Hussain Hashmi, 2023. "Mechanisms for Choosing PV Locations That Allow for the Most Sustainable Usage of Solar Energy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-24, February.
    12. Imad Hassan & Ibrahim Alhamrouni & Nurul Hanis Azhan, 2023. "A CRITIC–TOPSIS Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Approach for Optimum Site Selection for Solar PV Farm," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(10), pages 1-26, May.
    13. Sofia Spyridonidou & Georgia Sismani & Eva Loukogeorgaki & Dimitra G. Vagiona & Hagit Ulanovsky & Daniel Madar, 2021. "Sustainable Spatial Energy Planning of Large-Scale Wind and PV Farms in Israel: A Collaborative and Participatory Planning Approach," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-23, January.
    14. Sofia Spyridonidou & Eva Loukogeorgaki & Dimitra G. Vagiona & Teresa Bertrand, 2022. "Towards a Sustainable Spatial Planning Approach for PV Site Selection in Portugal," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(22), pages 1-22, November.
    15. Mladen Bošnjaković & Marinko Stojkov & Marko Katinić & Ivica Lacković, 2023. "Effects of Extreme Weather Conditions on PV Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(22), pages 1-22, November.
    16. Christian Manuel Moreno Rocha & Jorge D. Pertuz Ortiz & Neyder A. Rodriguez Ibanez, 2023. "A Diffuse Analysis Based on Analytical Processes to Prioritize Barriers in the Development of Renewable Energy Technologies in Alignment with the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals: Evidence," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 13(4), pages 481-195, July.
    17. Adalberto Ospino Castro & Sonni Troncoso-Mendoza & Rafael Pe a Gallardo & Ronald Zamora-Musa, 2021. "A Review: Integration of Renewable Energies in the Sustainability of the Electric Distribution Grid," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 11(4), pages 240-248.
    18. Saeed Al-Ali & Abdul Ghani Olabi & Montaser Mahmoud, 2024. "Multi-Criteria Decision Making for Selecting the Location of a Solar Photovoltaic Park: A Case Study in UAE," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(17), pages 1-14, August.
    19. James J. H. Liou & Peace Y. L. Liu & Sun-Weng Huang, 2023. "A Hybrid Model to Explore the Barriers to Enterprise Energy Storage System Adoption," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-21, October.
    20. Dinçer, A.E. & Demir, A. & Yılmaz, K., 2024. "Multi-objective turbine allocation on a wind farm site," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 355(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:20:p:8761-:d:1495869. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.