IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i19p8611-d1492051.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Economic Dynamics as the Main Limitation for Agricultural Sustainability in a Colombian Indigenous Community

Author

Listed:
  • Cintya Ojeda

    (SENNOVA—Servicio Nacional de Aprendizaje Regional Putumayo, Puerto Asís 862060, Colombia
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Jhoana P. Romero-Leiton

    (Facultad de Ciencias de la Educación, Universidad del Quindío, Armenia 630004, Colombia
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Mónica Jhoana Mesa

    (Facultad de Ciencias de la Educación, Universidad del Quindío, Armenia 630004, Colombia)

  • Juan Zapata

    (Universidad Nacional de Colombia Sede Palmira, Palmira 111321, Colombia)

  • Alvaro Ceballos

    (Universidad de Nariño, Pasto 520039, Colombia)

  • Solanyi Ordoñez

    (Agencia Nacional de Tierras, Mocoa 860001, Colombia)

  • Ivan Felipe Benavides

    (Grupo de Investigación ARENA, Facultad de Ciencias Agrícolas, Universidad de Nariño, Pasto 520002, Colombia)

Abstract

Ancient agroecological farms, or chagras, of the Kamëntšá Biyá and Kamëntšá Inga indigenous communities in the Sibundoy Valley of Colombia offer valuable insights into the environmental challenges of intensive agriculture and promote sustainable food production. Sustainability indices have been developed to assess farm-level sustainability and enhance agroecological practices; however, data limitations hinder monitoring and correlation with external factors. This study evaluated sustainability indices in Sibundoy Valley chagras using the holistic evaluation system for farming intensification (HESOFI) interview system with 800 randomly selected chagras, assessing economic, agro-environmental, and sociopolitical–cultural dimensions. The endogenous factors considered included areas managed with diversified agricultural systems, the percentage of transformed products, inputs generated by the chagra, and products intended for sale. Exogenous factors included distance to rivers, roads, cities, and vegetation index ratio. The results showed that all chagras fell below the minimum sustainability threshold (80%), with the economic dimension scoring the lowest. Based on these findings, three strategies were proposed to improve the economic scores and overall sustainability indices of these chagras.

Suggested Citation

  • Cintya Ojeda & Jhoana P. Romero-Leiton & Mónica Jhoana Mesa & Juan Zapata & Alvaro Ceballos & Solanyi Ordoñez & Ivan Felipe Benavides, 2024. "Economic Dynamics as the Main Limitation for Agricultural Sustainability in a Colombian Indigenous Community," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(19), pages 1-18, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:19:p:8611-:d:1492051
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/19/8611/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/19/8611/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Shailly Kedia & Rita Pandey & Ria Sinha, 2020. "Shaping the Post-COVID-19 Development Paradigm in India: Some Imperatives for Greening the Economic Recovery," Millennial Asia, , vol. 11(3), pages 268-298, December.
    2. Tariku Sagoya Gashute & Tefera Kagnalew Hale, 2023. "The role of permaculture in the integration of indigenous and modern agricultural knowledge: Evidence from Konso, Ethiopia," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(3), pages 1781-1789, June.
    3. Edinam Dope Setsoafia & Wanglin Ma & Alan Renwick, 2022. "Effects of sustainable agricultural practices on farm income and food security in northern Ghana," Agricultural and Food Economics, Springer;Italian Society of Agricultural Economics (SIDEA), vol. 10(1), pages 1-15, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Muralitharan Paramasua & Evelyn S. Devadason & Pardis Moslemzadeh Tehrani, 2023. "Stakeholders’ Perspectives on Market-based Instruments and Trade Policies for Environmental Goods: Evidence from Malaysia," Millennial Asia, , vol. 14(4), pages 480-508, December.
    2. Shaifali Chauhan & Richa Banerjee & Vishal Dagar, 2023. "Analysis of Impulse Buying Behaviour of Consumer During COVID-19: An Empirical Study," Millennial Asia, , vol. 14(2), pages 278-299, June.
    3. Balikisu Osman, 2023. "Climate and Food Insecurity Risks: Identifying Exposure and Vulnerabilities in the Post-Food Production System of Northern Ghana," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-19, November.
    4. Mishal Trevor Morepje & Isaac Azikiwe Agholor & Moses Zakhele Sithole & Lethu Inneth Mgwenya & Nomzamo Sharon Msweli & Variety Nkateko Thabane, 2024. "An Analysis of the Acceptance of Water Management Systems among Smallholder Farmers in Numbi, Mpumalanga Province, South Africa," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-18, February.
    5. Zhang, Daojun & Yang, Wanjing & Kang, Dingrong & Zhang, Han, 2023. "Spatial-temporal characteristics and policy implication for non-grain production of cultivated land in Guanzhong Region," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 125(C).
    6. Tomy Perdana & Diah Chaerani & Fernianda Rahayu Hermiatin & Audi Luqmanul Hakim Achmad & Ananda Fridayana, 2022. "Does an Alternative Local Food Network Contribute to Improving Sustainable Food Security?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-17, September.
    7. Ally Sithole & Oluwasogo David Olorunfemi, 2024. "Sustainable Agricultural Practices in Sub-Saharan Africa: A Review of Adoption Trends, Impacts, and Challenges Among Smallholder Farmers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(22), pages 1-22, November.
    8. Mahlako Nthabeleng Mokgomo & Clarietta Chagwiza & Phathutshedzo Fancy Tshilowa, 2022. "The Impact of Government Agricultural Development Support on Agricultural Income, Production and Food Security of Beneficiary Small-Scale Farmers in South Africa," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-21, October.
    9. Nana Liu & Zeshui Xu & Marinko Skare, 2021. "The research on COVID-19 and economy from 2019 to 2020: analysis from the perspective of bibliometrics," Oeconomia Copernicana, Institute of Economic Research, vol. 12(2), pages 217-268, June.
    10. Bi, Afrin Zainab & KB, Umesh, 2024. "Assessing the sustainability of vegetable production in India," IAAE 2024 Conference, August 2-7, 2024, New Delhi, India 344307, International Association of Agricultural Economists (IAAE).
    11. Yuan Hu & Ziyang Zhou & Li Zhou & Caiming Liu, 2024. "Self-Owned or Outsourced? The Impact of Farm Machinery Adoption Decisions on Chinese Farm Households’ Operating Income," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-26, October.
    12. Dimitrios Kalfas & Stavros Kalogiannidis & Olympia Papaevangelou & Katerina Melfou & Fotios Chatzitheodoridis, 2024. "Integration of Technology in Agricultural Practices towards Agricultural Sustainability: A Case Study of Greece," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-24, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:19:p:8611-:d:1492051. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.