IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i19p8583-d1491482.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Novel Approach to Estimating Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Federal Highway Construction Projects in Brazil

Author

Listed:
  • Bruno Vendramini dos Santos

    (Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Brasilia, Brasília 70910-900, Brazil)

  • João Henrique da Silva Rêgo

    (Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Brasilia, Brasília 70910-900, Brazil)

Abstract

In Brazil, the maintenance and expansion of the federal road network conflict with the country’s climate neutrality goals. The National Department of Transportation Infrastructure (DNIT), responsible for Brazil’s federal highways, lacks tools to assess and mitigate greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from its projects, which can be achieved through the life cycle assessment (LCA) methodology. Additionally, the scarcity and insufficient quality of environmental data on Brazilian road materials led to using foreign databases in LCA studies conducted in Brazil, generating uncertainties in the results. This research aims to apply LCA to analyze the GHG emissions from highway projects developed by DNIT. The analysis covers the phases of material production, transportation, and construction. Additionally, this study investigates the influence of the leading project disciplines on the results and the differences in outcomes resulting from the use of local Portland cement compared to its equivalent produced in the United States of America (USA) and Europe. The results indicate that the materials production phase has the most significant impact on the project’s global emissions, contributing over 78% in all scenarios. The transportation phase accounts for more than 16% of global emissions, with the potential for greater contributions depending on project transportation distances. Environmental data showed that foreign cement increased the project’s global emissions by 7.31% (Europe) and 12.91% (USA), with the most significant differences observed in pavement disciplines. In all scenarios, the discipline of new pavement presented the highest unitary emissions, followed by the discipline of restored pavement, which showed average values 58% lower than the former, and earthworks. Other services, drainage, and special structures disciplines showed minimal influence on the results. In conclusion, this research proposes an approach to estimate the environmental impact of Brazilian federal highway projects, enabling early mitigation of GHG emissions during the design phase, focusing on critical disciplines and materials, and highlighting potential distortions associated with the use of environmental data from foreign cement in LCA studies of Brazilian highways. Finally, considerations are presented regarding improving and expanding the scope of the calculation methodology used in this study, allowing for a more comprehensive and accurate analysis of the environmental impacts associated with the Brazilian federal road network.

Suggested Citation

  • Bruno Vendramini dos Santos & João Henrique da Silva Rêgo, 2024. "A Novel Approach to Estimating Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Federal Highway Construction Projects in Brazil," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(19), pages 1-19, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:19:p:8583-:d:1491482
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/19/8583/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/19/8583/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Diaz-Sarachaga, Jose Manuel & Jato-Espino, Daniel & Castro-Fresno, Daniel, 2017. "Methodology for the development of a new Sustainable Infrastructure Rating System for Developing Countries (SIRSDEC)," Environmental Science & Policy, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 65-72.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Fernando Fonseca & Escolástica Fernandes & Rui Ramos, 2022. "Walkable Cities: Using the Smart Pedestrian Net Method for Evaluating a Pedestrian Network in Guimarães, Portugal," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-23, August.
    2. Seyit Ali Erdogan & Jonas Šaparauskas & Zenonas Turskis, 2019. "A Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Model to Choose the Best Option for Sustainable Construction Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-19, April.
    3. Rafael Lizarralde & Jaione Ganzarain & Mikel Zubizarreta, 2020. "Assessment and Selection of Technologies for the Sustainable Development of an R&D Center," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-23, December.
    4. Oriol Pons & Saeid Habibi & Diana Peña, 2018. "Sustainability Assessment of Household Waste Based Solar Control Devices for Workshops in Primary Schools," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-23, November.
    5. Shuvo Dip Datta & Bassam A. Tayeh & Ibrahim Y. Hakeem & Yazan I. Abu Aisheh, 2023. "Benefits and Barriers of Implementing Building Information Modeling Techniques for Sustainable Practices in the Construction Industry—A Comprehensive Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-28, August.
    6. Paolo Rosasco & Leopoldo Sdino, 2023. "The Social Sustainability of the Infrastructures: A Case Study in the Liguria Region," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-27, January.
    7. Pan, Wei & Yu, Cong & Bai, Yefei & Du, Jia, 2023. "A four-level hierarchical framework for reviewing infrastructure sustainability assessment systems," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 187(C).
    8. Chung-Shing Chan & Lawal M. Marafa, 2018. "Knowledge-Perception Bridge of Green-Smart Integration of Cities: An Empirical Study of Hong Kong," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-19, January.
    9. Pamela Del Rosario & Marzia Traverso, 2023. "Towards Sustainable Roads: A Systematic Review of Triple-Bottom-Line-Based Assessment Methods," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(21), pages 1-41, November.
    10. Wen-Kuo Chen & Venkateswarlu Nalluri & Man-Li Lin & Ching-Torng Lin, 2021. "Identifying Decisive Socio-Political Sustainability Barriers in the Supply Chain of Banking Sector in India: Causality Analysis Using ISM and MICMAC," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(3), pages 1-23, January.
    11. Brenda Mutanu Munyasya & Nicholas Chileshe, 2018. "Towards Sustainable Infrastructure Development: Drivers, Barriers, Strategies, and Coping Mechanisms," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-18, November.
    12. Yuanli Li & Pengcheng Xiang & Kairui You & Jin Guo & Zhaowen Liu & Hong Ren, 2021. "Identifying the Key Risk Factors of Mega Infrastructure Projects from an Extended Sustainable Development Perspective," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(14), pages 1-29, July.
    13. Damián Rodríguez Estévez & Rosa María Arce Ruíz, 2024. "Assessing Multilateral Development Bank ESG Safeguard Integration with International Sustainability Ratings," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(9), pages 1-27, April.
    14. Qiuli Cheng & Bassam A. Tayeh & Yazan I. Abu Aisheh & Wesam Salah Alaloul & Ziad A. Aldahdooh, 2024. "Leveraging BIM for Sustainable Construction: Benefits, Barriers, and Best Practices," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-29, September.
    15. Hongyang Li & Ruoyu Jin & Xin Ning & Martin Skitmore & Tianyao Zhang, 2018. "Prioritizing the Sustainability Objectives of Major Public Projects in the Guangdong–Hong Kong–Macao Greater Bay Area," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-23, November.
    16. Igor Kabashkin & Zura Sansyzbayeva, 2024. "Methodological Framework for Sustainable Transport Corridor Modeling Using Petri Nets," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-33, January.
    17. D'Adamo, Idiano & Falcone, Pasquale Marcello & Morone, Piergiuseppe, 2020. "A New Socio-economic Indicator to Measure the Performance of Bioeconomy Sectors in Europe," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
    18. David Boix-Cots & Francesc Pardo-Bosch & Pablo Pujadas, 2024. "Introducing the Comprehensive Value Function for Sustainability Full-Spectrum Assessment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-14, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:19:p:8583-:d:1491482. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.