IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i19p8386-d1486611.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Application of Recycled Cardboard to Construction Based on Life Cycle Assessment

Author

Listed:
  • Srikanth Venkatesan

    (Department of Civil & Infrastructure, STEM College, RMIT University, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia)

  • Jingxuan Zhang

    (Department of Civil & Infrastructure, STEM College, RMIT University, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia)

  • David Law

    (Department of Civil & Infrastructure, STEM College, RMIT University, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia)

  • Rebecca Gravina

    (The School of Engineering, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD 4072, Australia)

  • Satheeskumar Navaratnam

    (Department of Civil & Infrastructure, STEM College, RMIT University, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia)

Abstract

Typical household recyclable bin in Australia contains around 60% of waste cardboard. Given the possibilities of developing a construction material, this study conducted a life cycle assessment (LCA) comparing the development of cardboard trusses with © timber trusses, encompassing production to construction. The results show that cardboard trusses offer significant environmental benefits, including a 73% reduction in climate change category, an 83% decrease in ozone-depleting potential, and almost complete avoidance of agricultural land occupation compared to timber trusses, showcasing their sustainability. In both material manufacturing and material transportation, cardboard trusses prioritize climate change mitigation, accounting for over half of the environmental impact. Timber trusses, in contrast, heavily impact land occupation and exhibit climate change dominance. A benefit analysis highlights advantages of cardboard trusses, particularly in reducing land occupation, sustainability, circular economy, and particulate matter formation. The life cycle cost analysis demonstrates an impressive 83% cost reduction for cardboard trusses compared to timber trusses, despite higher labor costs during manufacturing.

Suggested Citation

  • Srikanth Venkatesan & Jingxuan Zhang & David Law & Rebecca Gravina & Satheeskumar Navaratnam, 2024. "Application of Recycled Cardboard to Construction Based on Life Cycle Assessment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(19), pages 1-21, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:19:p:8386-:d:1486611
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/19/8386/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/19/8386/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jingxuan Zhang & Sarah Fernando & David W. Law & Chamila Gunasekara & Sujeeva Setunge & Malindu Sandanayake & Guomin Zhang, 2023. "Life Cycle Assessment for Geopolymer Concrete Bricks Using Brown Coal Fly Ash," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-20, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Samar Amari & Mariam Darestani & Graeme J. Millar & Bijan Samali & Ekaterina Strounina, 2024. "Engineering and Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) of Sustainable Zeolite-Based Geopolymer Incorporating Blast Furnace Slag," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-23, January.
    2. Tseng-Hsian Lin & Hung-Jung Siao & Sue-Huai Gau & Jen-Hwa Kuo & Ming-Guo Li & Chang-Jung Sun, 2023. "Life-Cycle Assessment of Municipal Solid Waste Incineration Fly Ash Recycling as a Feedstock for Brick Manufacturing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-20, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:19:p:8386-:d:1486611. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.