IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i19p8368-d1486226.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Does a Logging Ban Policy Increase Socio-Ecological Resilience? A Case Study of Key State-Owned Forest Areas in Northeast China

Author

Listed:
  • Shuyao Luo

    (School of Economics and Management, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China)

  • Dan Qiao

    (School of Economics and Management, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China)

  • Xiao Han

    (School of Economics and Management, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China)

  • Boyao Song

    (School of Economics and Management, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China)

  • Zhihan Wan

    (School of Economics and Management, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China)

  • Hongxun Li

    (School of Economics and Management, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China)

Abstract

The resilience of forests refers to the ability of a forest to withstand disturbance and maintain its function and control. After an early phase of historical logging to support economic development, changes in the socio-ecological resilience of key state-owned forest areas in Northeastern China (later collectively referred to as Northeastern state-owned forests) after implementing a total logging ban policy remain unknown. In this study, the Northeast state-owned forest area was selected as the study area, and based on the panel data from 2008 to 2021, the indicator system at both social and ecological levels was established, and the socio-ecological resilience of the Northeast state-owned forest area was assessed using comprehensive weights and set-pair analysis. The results show that (1) the logging ban policy effectively improves socio-ecological resilience, which reached the highest point of the whole measurement period in 2018. (2) The socio-ecological system has a certain self-adjustment and resilience but has shown a decreasing trend in recent years. By exploring the causes behind the results, we can provide guidance and suggestions for the further implementation of the logging ban policy and, at the same time, provide some lessons for other developing countries with similar problems.

Suggested Citation

  • Shuyao Luo & Dan Qiao & Xiao Han & Boyao Song & Zhihan Wan & Hongxun Li, 2024. "Does a Logging Ban Policy Increase Socio-Ecological Resilience? A Case Study of Key State-Owned Forest Areas in Northeast China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(19), pages 1-21, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:19:p:8368-:d:1486226
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/19/8368/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/19/8368/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tumaneng-Diete, T. & Ferguson, Ian S. & MacLaren, Donald, 2005. "Log export restrictions and trade policies in the Philippines: bane or blessing to sustainable forest management?," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 7(2), pages 187-198, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sylvester Ngome Chisika & Juneyoung Park & Chunho Yeom, 2019. "The Impact of Legislation on Sustainability of Farm Forests in Kenya: The Case of Lugari Sub-County in Kakamega County, Kenya," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-15, December.
    2. Kastner, Thomas, 2009. "Trajectories in human domination of ecosystems: Human appropriation of net primary production in the Philippines during the 20th century," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 69(2), pages 260-269, December.
    3. San Cristobal, Jose Ramon, 2007. "Effects on the economy of a decrease in forest resources: An international comparison," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 9(6), pages 647-652, February.
    4. Fischer, Richard & Lippe, Melvin & Dolom, Priscilla & Kalaba, Felix Kanungwe & Tamayo, Fabian & Torres, Bolier, 2023. "Effectiveness of policy instrument mixes for forest conservation in the tropics – Stakeholder perceptions from Ecuador, the Philippines and Zambia," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 127(C).
    5. Ram Avtar & Kenichi Tsusaka & Srikantha Herath, 2019. "REDD+ Implementation in Community-Based Muyong Forest Management in Ifugao, Philippines," Land, MDPI, vol. 8(11), pages 1-16, November.
    6. Mili Ghosh & Bhaskar Sinha, 2016. "Impact of forest policies on timber production in India: a review," Natural Resources Forum, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 40(1-2), pages 62-76, February.
    7. Laia PIÉ DOLS & Maria LLOP LLOP, 2010. "Modelling a Reduction of Greenhouse Gases Emissions in the Catalan Economy: The NAMEA Approach," EcoMod2010 259600132, EcoMod.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:19:p:8368-:d:1486226. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.