IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i18p8029-d1477800.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Economic Impacts of the Electric Road System Implementation on the Rotterdam–Antwerp Corridor

Author

Listed:
  • Raimonds Aronietis

    (Department of Transport and Regional Economics, University of Antwerp, Prinsstraat 13, 2000 Antwerp, Belgium)

  • Thierry Vanelslander

    (Department of Transport and Regional Economics, University of Antwerp, Prinsstraat 13, 2000 Antwerp, Belgium)

Abstract

Electric road systems (ERSs) are a group of technologies that allow powering adequately equipped road transport vehicles with electricity from the road infrastructure while in motorway traffic. They can be categorised into three technology groups: overhead catenary, ground conductive, and ground inductive, depending on the mode of power transfer used. The supplied energy is used for propulsion and for charging the vehicle batteries to be used once the vehicle leaves the electrified road section. Also, another energy source, e.g., diesel, natural gas, or hydrogen, can be used while away from the ERS. This research investigates the potential impacts of implementing the different ERS technologies on the Rotterdam–Antwerp motorway corridor that links the two largest ports in Europe. The aim is to identify which of the routes between the ports is best suited for the implementation of an ERS, whether there are substantial differences in the economic performance of the different ERS technologies, determine what ERS vehicle traffic volumes are required and potentially available for successful implementation, what investment is required to build the system and whether the ERS operator can be profitable, and whether transport operators could operate their trucks on ERS profitability in this corridor setting. The research shows that the route between Rotterdam and Antwerp that runs on motorway E19 is the best to be electrified from an economic standpoint. Our calculations show that the traffic on the Rotterdam–Antwerp corridor is sufficient for economically justifying ERS infrastructure rollout and operation. For transport operators who happen to have specific client bases, e.g., those who usually serve clients from one of the ports along the electrified route, the construction of an ERS on the route could prove to be very lucrative if they adopt the technology early.

Suggested Citation

  • Raimonds Aronietis & Thierry Vanelslander, 2024. "Economic Impacts of the Electric Road System Implementation on the Rotterdam–Antwerp Corridor," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(18), pages 1-20, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:18:p:8029-:d:1477800
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/18/8029/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/18/8029/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jelica, D. & Taljegard, M. & Thorson, L. & Johnsson, F., 2018. "Hourly electricity demand from an electric road system – A Swedish case study," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 228(C), pages 141-148.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wojciech Rabiega & Artur Gorzałczyński & Robert Jeszke & Paweł Mzyk & Krystian Szczepański, 2021. "How Long Will Combustion Vehicles Be Used? Polish Transport Sector on the Pathway to Climate Neutrality," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-19, November.
    2. Liimatainen, Heikki & van Vliet, Oscar & Aplyn, David, 2019. "The potential of electric trucks – An international commodity-level analysis," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 236(C), pages 804-814.
    3. Colovic, Aleksandra & Marinelli, Mario & Ottomanelli, Michele, 2024. "Towards the electrification of freight transport: A network design model for assessing the adoption of eHighways," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 106-120.
    4. Erik Dahlquist & Fredrik Wallin & Koteshwar Chirumalla & Reza Toorajipour & Glenn Johansson, 2023. "Balancing Power in Sweden Using Different Renewable Resources, Varying Prices, and Storages Like Batteries in a Resilient Energy System," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(12), pages 1-28, June.
    5. Jose Juan Caceres-Hernandez & Gloria Martin-Rodriguez & Jonay Hernandez-Martin, 2022. "A proposal for measuring and comparing seasonal variations in hourly economic time series," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 62(4), pages 1995-2021, April.
    6. David I. Okorie, 2021. "A network analysis of electricity demand and the cryptocurrency markets," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 26(2), pages 3093-3108, April.
    7. Feng, Xuning & Zheng, Siqi & Ren, Dongsheng & He, Xiangming & Wang, Li & Cui, Hao & Liu, Xiang & Jin, Changyong & Zhang, Fangshu & Xu, Chengshan & Hsu, Hungjen & Gao, Shang & Chen, Tianyu & Li, Yalun , 2019. "Investigating the thermal runaway mechanisms of lithium-ion batteries based on thermal analysis database," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 246(C), pages 53-64.
    8. Michel Noussan & Giovanni Carioni & Francesco Davide Sanvito & Emanuela Colombo, 2019. "Urban Mobility Demand Profiles: Time Series for Cars and Bike-Sharing Use as a Resource for Transport and Energy Modeling," Data, MDPI, vol. 4(3), pages 1-12, July.
    9. Li, Yanning & Li, Xinwei & Jenn, Alan, 2022. "Evaluating the emission benefits of shared autonomous electric vehicle fleets: A case study in California," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 323(C).
    10. Bakker, J. & Lopez Alvarez, J.A. & Buijs, P., 2024. "A network design perspective on the adoption potential of electric road systems in early development stages," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 361(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:18:p:8029-:d:1477800. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.