IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i18p7882-d1474828.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Trends in the Research and Development of Soil Nitrogen Mineralization in Forests from 2004 to 2024

Author

Listed:
  • Xiumin Zhang

    (Research Center for Engineering Ecology and Nonlinear Science, North China Electric Power University, Beijing 102206, China)

  • Huayong Zhang

    (Research Center for Engineering Ecology and Nonlinear Science, North China Electric Power University, Beijing 102206, China
    Theoretical Ecology and Engineering Ecology Research Group, School of Life Sciences, Shandong University, Qingdao 266237, China)

  • Zhongyu Wang

    (Research Center for Engineering Ecology and Nonlinear Science, North China Electric Power University, Beijing 102206, China)

  • Yonglan Tian

    (Research Center for Engineering Ecology and Nonlinear Science, North China Electric Power University, Beijing 102206, China)

  • Zhao Liu

    (Theoretical Ecology and Engineering Ecology Research Group, School of Life Sciences, Shandong University, Qingdao 266237, China)

Abstract

Nitrogen (N) is a vital mineral nutrient for plant growth and occupies a pivotal position in biogeochemical systems. Soil nitrogen mineralization (SNM) in forests represents a significant limiting factor in terrestrial ecosystem productivity in the context of global climate change. To understand the research status and development trends of SNM in forests, 3576 articles spanning 2004 to 2024 from the Web of Science (WOS) database were analyzed using CiteSpace software. The results indicated that (1) the mean number of articles published in the recent ten-year period is 193, marking an approximate 17.8% increase compared to the preceding ten-year period (2004–2013), highlighting the continuous development of SNM research; (2) among the sampled articles, Soil Biology and Biochemistry , Forest Ecology and Management , Plant and Soil , and Biogeochemistry emerged as leading international journals that played a key role in shaping the development of the field and laid a solid foundation for future research efforts; (3) the USA and China emerged as the most productive countries in this field, with the Chinese Academy of Sciences standing out as a prominent institution at the forefront of this research domain; and (4) recent research is focusing on understanding the interactions between microbial communities and the environment during SNM. In summary, this study offers valuable insights into the research status and development trends of SNM in forests. It underscores the importance of ongoing interdisciplinary collaboration and innovation to further enhance our understanding of key ecological processes. Future research on SNM in forests is encouraged to delve deeper into its associations with forest productivity, carbon cycling, microbial functions, and global change. Additionally, exploring sustainable land management and process optimization is recommended to promote the healthy and sustainable development of forest ecosystems.

Suggested Citation

  • Xiumin Zhang & Huayong Zhang & Zhongyu Wang & Yonglan Tian & Zhao Liu, 2024. "Trends in the Research and Development of Soil Nitrogen Mineralization in Forests from 2004 to 2024," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(18), pages 1-18, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:18:p:7882-:d:1474828
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/18/7882/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/18/7882/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Anton J. Nederhof, 2006. "Bibliometric monitoring of research performance in the Social Sciences and the Humanities: A Review," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 66(1), pages 81-100, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Metwaly Ali Mohamed Eldakar, 2019. "Who reads international Egyptian academic articles? An altmetrics analysis of Mendeley readership categories," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 121(1), pages 105-135, October.
    2. Ramón A. Feenstra & Emilio Delgado López-Cózar, 2022. "Philosophers’ appraisals of bibliometric indicators and their use in evaluation: from recognition to knee-jerk rejection," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 127(4), pages 2085-2103, April.
    3. Walters, William H., 2017. "Do subjective journal ratings represent whole journals or typical articles? Unweighted or weighted citation impact?," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 11(3), pages 730-744.
    4. Daniela De Filippo & Fernanda Morillo & Borja González-Albo, 2023. "Measuring the Impact and Influence of Scientific Activity in the Humanities and Social Sciences," Publications, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-17, June.
    5. Sándor Soós & Zsófia Vida & András Schubert, 2018. "Long-term trends in the multidisciplinarity of some typical natural and social sciences, and its implications on the SSH versus STM distinction," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 114(3), pages 795-822, March.
    6. Zoltán Krajcsák, 2021. "Researcher Performance in Scopus Articles ( RPSA ) as a New Scientometric Model of Scientific Output: Tested in Business Area of V4 Countries," Publications, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-23, October.
    7. Geert Campenhout & Tom Caneghem & Steve Uytbergen, 2008. "A comparison of overall and sub-area journal influence: The case of the accounting literature," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 77(1), pages 61-90, October.
    8. Aksnes, Dag W. & Rip, Arie, 2009. "Researchers' perceptions of citations," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(6), pages 895-905, July.
    9. Qing Ji & Xiaoping Pang & Xi Zhao, 2014. "A bibliometric analysis of research on Antarctica during 1993–2012," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 101(3), pages 1925-1939, December.
    10. Eugenio Petrovich, 2022. "Bibliometrics in Press. Representations and uses of bibliometric indicators in the Italian daily newspapers," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 127(5), pages 2195-2233, May.
    11. Wei, Yi-Ming & Mi, Zhi-Fu & Huang, Zhimin, 2015. "Climate policy modeling: An online SCI-E and SSCI based literature review," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 57(PA), pages 70-84.
    12. Ülle Must, 2012. "Alone or together: examples from history research," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 91(2), pages 527-537, May.
    13. Pooja Kapoor & Sujata Kar, 2023. "A review of inflation expectations and perceptions research in the past four decades: a bibliometric analysis," International Economics and Economic Policy, Springer, vol. 20(2), pages 279-302, May.
    14. Bullock, Ryan & Lawler, Julia, 2015. "Community forestry research in Canada: A bibliometric perspective," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 47-55.
    15. Gérard Charreaux, 2011. "«Cité ou oublié»:les supports de la notoriété des professeurs en sciences de gestion vus à travers Google Scholar," Revue Finance Contrôle Stratégie, revues.org, vol. 14(4), pages 129-166, December.
    16. Alesia Zuccala & Roberto Cornacchia, 2016. "Data matching, integration, and interoperability for a metric assessment of monographs," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 108(1), pages 465-484, July.
    17. Franc Mali, 2013. "Why an Unbiased External R&D Evaluation System is Important for the Progress of Social Sciences—the Case of a Small Social Science Community," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 2(4), pages 1-14, December.
    18. Jordi Ardanuy & Llorenç Arguimbau & Ángel Borrego, 2022. "Social sciences and humanities research funded under the European Union Sixth Framework Programme (2002–2006): a long-term assessment of projects, acknowledgements and publications," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 9(1), pages 1-13, December.
    19. Mladen Djuric & Marina Dobrota & Jovan Filipovic, 2020. "Complexity-based quality indicators for human and social capital in science and research: the case of Serbian Homeland versus Diaspora," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 124(1), pages 303-328, July.
    20. Daniel Torres-Salinas & Nicolás Robinson-Garcia & Juan Gorraiz, 2017. "Filling the citation gap: measuring the multidimensional impact of the academic book at institutional level with PlumX," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 113(3), pages 1371-1384, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:18:p:7882-:d:1474828. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.