IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i17p7852-d1474258.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Dual Transition of Net Zero Carbon and Digital Transformation: Case Study of UK Transportation Sector

Author

Listed:
  • Joel Manifold

    (Faculty of Science and Engineering, University of Wolverhampton, Wolverhampton WV1 1LY, UK
    Tony Gee and Partners LLP, Birmingham B2 5BN, UK)

  • Suresh Renukappa

    (Faculty of Science and Engineering, University of Wolverhampton, Wolverhampton WV1 1LY, UK)

  • Subashini Suresh

    (Faculty of Science and Engineering, University of Wolverhampton, Wolverhampton WV1 1LY, UK)

  • Panagiotis Georgakis

    (Faculty of Science and Engineering, University of Wolverhampton, Wolverhampton WV1 1LY, UK)

  • Gamage Rashini Perera

    (Faculty of Science and Engineering, University of Wolverhampton, Wolverhampton WV1 1LY, UK)

Abstract

The UK Government’s Building Information Modelling (BIM) mandate has encouraged the utilisation of BIM within the Transportation Sector (TS), with research demonstrating positive effects of BIM. However, BIM processes are incipient to TS project implementation across the UK. This paper is carried out to understand the current BIM usage within the UK’s TS and how BIM practises and workflows contribute towards the government’s NZC approach. We used research questions derived from the population, intervention, comparison and outcome (PICO) system and inclusion and exclusion criteria to screen irrelevant information from a Systematic Literature review with 18 pieces of literature. We identified six key drivers: carbon reduction and BIM, BIM in transportation design, BIM uptake and usage in transportation, BIM in transportation construction and Digital Twins and BIM. It was identified that, with the integration of the Carbon Calculator Tool into Civil 3D, structural and material data can be obtained and areas of Embodied Carbon hotspots can be identified to contribute to reduce overall carbon across a project, which requires further collaboration between software providers and industry leaders for further streamlining the process. A limitation of this research is the requirement for wider study of differing disciplines within the TS, more qualitative research and a lack of information regarding other Carbon Calculator Tools and how compatible they are with Civil 3D.

Suggested Citation

  • Joel Manifold & Suresh Renukappa & Subashini Suresh & Panagiotis Georgakis & Gamage Rashini Perera, 2024. "Dual Transition of Net Zero Carbon and Digital Transformation: Case Study of UK Transportation Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-30, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:17:p:7852-:d:1474258
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/17/7852/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/17/7852/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Shahbaz, Muhammad & Nasir, Muhammad Ali & Hille, Erik & Mahalik, Mantu Kumar, 2020. "UK's net-zero carbon emissions target: Investigating the potential role of economic growth, financial development, and R&D expenditures based on historical data (1870–2017)," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    2. Ehab Shahat & Chang T. Hyun & Chunho Yeom, 2021. "City Digital Twin Potentials: A Review and Research Agenda," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-20, March.
    3. Ghang Lee & André Borrmann, 2020. "BIM policy and management," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 38(5), pages 413-419, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wang, Zheng-Xin & Jv, Yue-Qi, 2021. "A non-linear systematic grey model for forecasting the industrial economy-energy-environment system," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    2. Claire Daniel & Christopher Pettit, 2022. "Charting the past and possible futures of planning support systems: Results of a citation network analysis," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 49(7), pages 1875-1892, September.
    3. Naeem, Muhammad Abubakr & Appiah, Michael & Karim, Sitara & Yarovaya, Larisa, 2023. "What abates environmental efficiency in African economies? Exploring the influence of infrastructure, industrialization, and innovation," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 186(PB).
    4. Xueyang Liu & Xiaoxing Liu, 2021. "Can Financial Development Curb Carbon Emissions? Empirical Test Based on Spatial Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-19, October.
    5. Yadi Zhao & Lei Yan & Jian Wu & Ximing Song, 2023. "Design and Implementation of a Digital Twin System for Log Rotary Cutting Optimization," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-14, December.
    6. Yahya, Farzan & Lee, Chien-Chiang, 2023. "Disentangling the asymmetric effect of financialization on the green output gap," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 125(C).
    7. Pata, Ugur Korkut & Kartal, Mustafa Tevfik & Erdogan, Sinan & Sarkodie, Samuel Asumadu, 2023. "The role of renewable and nuclear energy R&D expenditures and income on environmental quality in Germany: Scrutinizing the EKC and LCC hypotheses with smooth structural changes," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 342(C).
    8. Martínez-Navarro, Diego & Amate-Fortes, Ignacio & Guarnido-Rueda, Almudena & Oliver-Márquez, Francisco J., 2022. "Institutional Kuznets curve? An empirical analysis with panel data," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 35-39.
    9. Wang, Miao & Feng, Chao, 2021. "The win-win ability of environmental protection and economic development during China's transition," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 166(C).
    10. Hossein Omrany & Karam M. Al-Obaidi & Amreen Husain & Amirhosein Ghaffarianhoseini, 2023. "Digital Twins in the Construction Industry: A Comprehensive Review of Current Implementations, Enabling Technologies, and Future Directions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-26, July.
    11. Vittorio Astarita & Giuseppe Guido & Sina Shaffiee Haghshenas & Sami Shaffiee Haghshenas, 2024. "Risk Reduction in Transportation Systems: The Role of Digital Twins According to a Bibliometric-Based Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-26, April.
    12. Lahiani, Amine & Mefteh-Wali, Salma & Shahbaz, Muhammad & Vo, Xuan Vinh, 2021. "Does financial development influence renewable energy consumption to achieve carbon neutrality in the USA?," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    13. Zou, Qizhi & Wu, Qian & Wang, Jia, 2024. "Is natural resources curse possible under the digitalization? A loon on top digitalized economies," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    14. Nassani, Abdelmohsen A. & Aldakhil, Abdullah Mohammed & Zaman, Khalid, 2021. "Ecological footprints jeopardy for mineral resource extraction: Efficient use of energy, financial development and insurance services to conserve natural resources," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    15. Zhen Liu & Trong Lam Vu & Thi Thu Hien Phan & Thanh Quang Ngo & Nguyen Ho Viet Anh & Ahmad Romadhoni Surya Putra, 2022. "Financial inclusion and green economic performance for energy efficiency finance," Economic Change and Restructuring, Springer, vol. 55(4), pages 2359-2389, November.
    16. Maciej Ciołek & Izabela Emerling & Katarzyna Olejko & Beata Sadowska & Magdalena Wójcik-Jurkiewicz, 2022. "Assumptions of the Energy Policy of the Country versus Investment Outlays Related to the Purchase of Alternative Fuels: Poland as a Case Study," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-18, March.
    17. Milena Kajba & Borut Jereb & Tina Cvahte Ojsteršek, 2023. "Exploring Digital Twins in the Transport and Energy Fields: A Bibliometrics and Literature Review Approach," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(9), pages 1-23, May.
    18. Zeng, Shihong & Li, Tengfei & Wu, Shaomin & Gao, Weijun & Li, Gen, 2024. "Does green technology progress have a significant impact on carbon dioxide emissions?," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 133(C).
    19. Aniqa Arslan & Arslan Qayyum & Mosab I. Tabash & Kiran Nair & Muhammad AsadUllah & Linda Nalini Daniel, 2023. "The Impact of Economic Complexity, Usage of Energy, Tourism, and Economic Growth on Carbon Emissions: Empirical Evidence of 102 Countries," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 13(5), pages 315-324, September.
    20. Zafar, Muhammad Wasif & Zaidi, Syed Anees Haider & Mansoor, Sadia & Sinha, Avik & Qin, Quande, 2022. "ICT and education as determinants of environmental quality: The role of financial development in selected Asian countries," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 177(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:17:p:7852-:d:1474258. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.