IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i17p7812-d1473631.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Research on Sustainable Form Design of NEV Vehicle Based on Particle Swarm Algorithm Optimized Support Vector Regression

Author

Listed:
  • Zongming Liu

    (School of Design and Art, Shaanxi University of Science and Technology, Xi’an 710016, China)

  • Xuhui Chen

    (School of Design and Art, Shaanxi University of Science and Technology, Xi’an 710016, China)

  • Xinan Liang

    (School of Packaging Design and Art, Hunan University of Technology, Zhuzhou 412007, China)

  • Shiwen Huang

    (School of Architecture and Design, Nanchang University, Nanchang 330031, China)

  • Yang Zhao

    (School of Design and Art, Shaanxi University of Science and Technology, Xi’an 710016, China)

Abstract

With the growing emphasis on eco-friendly and sustainable development concepts, new energy vehicles (NEVs) have emerged as a popular alternative to traditional fuel vehicles (FVs). Due to the absence of an internal combustion engine, electric vehicles (EVs) do not require a front air intake grille, allowing for a more minimalist and flexible design. Consequently, aligning EV styling with users’ visual cognition and emotional perception is a critical objective for automakers and designers. In this study, we establish the mapping relationship between users’ emotional cognition and NEV styling design based on experimental data. We introduce Particle Swarm Optimization Support Vector Regression (PSO-SVR) into the perceptual engineering (KE) research process to predict user emotions using Support Vector Regression (SVR). To optimize the three hyperparameters (penalty coefficient C, RBF kernel function parameter γ, and insensitivity loss coefficient ε) of the SVR model, we utilize the Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) algorithm. The results indicate that the proposed PSO-SVR model outperforms traditional SVR and BPNN models in predicting NEV user emotions. This model effectively captures the nonlinear relationship between battery electric vehicle (BEV) morphological features and users’ emotional cognition, providing a novel method for enhancing NEV design. The results of this research are expected to drive design innovation and technological advancement in the new energy vehicle industry, contributing to the achievement of the ambitious goal of global eco-friendliness and sustainable development.

Suggested Citation

  • Zongming Liu & Xuhui Chen & Xinan Liang & Shiwen Huang & Yang Zhao, 2024. "Research on Sustainable Form Design of NEV Vehicle Based on Particle Swarm Algorithm Optimized Support Vector Regression," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-22, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:17:p:7812-:d:1473631
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/17/7812/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/17/7812/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kuo, Ting, 2017. "A modified TOPSIS with a different ranking index," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 260(1), pages 152-160.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhang, Sheng & Lin, Zhang & Ai, Zhengtao & Huan, Chao & Cheng, Yong & Wang, Fenghao, 2019. "Multi-criteria performance optimization for operation of stratum ventilation under heating mode," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(C), pages 969-980.
    2. Pätäri, Eero & Karell, Ville & Luukka, Pasi & Yeomans, Julian S, 2018. "Comparison of the multicriteria decision-making methods for equity portfolio selection: The U.S. evidence," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 265(2), pages 655-672.
    3. Xiaodong Yuan & Weiling Song, 2022. "Evaluating technology innovation capabilities of companies based on entropy- TOPSIS: the case of solar cell companies," Information Technology and Management, Springer, vol. 23(2), pages 65-76, June.
    4. Shilei Lu & Minchao Fan & Yiqun Zhao, 2018. "A System to Pre-Evaluate the Suitability of Energy-Saving Technology for Green Buildings," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-19, October.
    5. Francesco Ciardiello & Andrea Genovese, 2023. "A comparison between TOPSIS and SAW methods," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 325(2), pages 967-994, June.
    6. Leandro Peçanha De Souza & Carlos Francisco Simões Gomes & Alexandre Pinheiro De Barros, 2018. "Implementation of New Hybrid AHP–TOPSIS-2N Method in Sorting and Prioritizing of an it CAPEX Project Portfolio," International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making (IJITDM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 17(04), pages 977-1005, July.
    7. Lo, Huai-Wei & Liou, James J.H. & Huang, Chun-Nen & Chuang, Yen-Ching, 2019. "A novel failure mode and effect analysis model for machine tool risk analysis," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 183(C), pages 173-183.
    8. Huang, Wencheng & Shuai, Bin & Sun, Yan & Wang, Yang & Antwi, Eric, 2018. "Using entropy-TOPSIS method to evaluate urban rail transit system operation performance: The China case," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 292-303.
    9. Ozum Egilmez & Gozde Koca, 2021. "Drivers, Challenges, and Integration of Health 4.0 Societal Engagement: Evidence from Turkey," Istanbul Business Research, Istanbul University Business School, vol. 50(1), pages 127-148, May.
    10. Liu, Yong-Jun & Yang, Guo-Sen & Zhang, Wei-Guo, 2024. "A novel regret-rejoice cross-efficiency approach for energy stock portfolio optimization," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 126(C).
    11. Mu-Hsin Chang & James J. H. Liou & Huai-Wei Lo, 2019. "A Hybrid MCDM Model for Evaluating Strategic Alliance Partners in the Green Biopharmaceutical Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(15), pages 1-20, July.
    12. Susmaga, Robert & Szczȩch, Izabela & Zielniewicz, Piotr & Brzezinski, Dariusz, 2023. "MSD-space: Visualizing the inner-workings of TOPSIS aggregations," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 308(1), pages 229-242.
    13. Soheil Azizi & Milad Mohammadi, 2023. "Strategy selection for multi-objective redundancy allocation problem in a k-out-of-n system considering the mean time to failure," OPSEARCH, Springer;Operational Research Society of India, vol. 60(2), pages 1021-1044, June.
    14. Dhalmahapatra, Krantiraditya & Garg, Ashish & Singh, Kritika & Xavier, Nirmal Francis & Maiti, J., 2022. "An integrated RFUCOM – RTOPSIS approach for failure modes and effects analysis: A case of manufacturing industry," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 221(C).
    15. Huai-Wei Lo & Chao-Che Hsu & Chun-Nen Huang & James J. H. Liou, 2021. "An ITARA-TOPSIS Based Integrated Assessment Model to Identify Potential Product and System Risks," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(3), pages 1-17, January.
    16. Morteza Yazdani & Prasenjit Chatterjee & Maria Jose Montero-Simo & Rafael A. Araque-Padilla, 2019. "An Integrated Multi-Attribute Model for Evaluation of Sustainable Mobile Phone," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(13), pages 1-18, July.
    17. Tingting Li & Dan Zhao & Guiyun Liu & Yuhong Wang, 2022. "How to Evaluate College Students’ Green Innovation Ability—A Method Combining BWM and Modified Fuzzy TOPSIS," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-17, August.
    18. Surya Michrandi Nasution & Emir Husni & Kuspriyanto Kuspriyanto & Rahadian Yusuf, 2022. "Personalized Route Recommendation Using F-AHP-Express," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-28, August.
    19. Amin Vafadarnikjoo & Madjid Tavana & Tiago Botelho & Konstantinos Chalvatzis, 2020. "A neutrosophic enhanced best–worst method for considering decision-makers’ confidence in the best and worst criteria," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 289(2), pages 391-418, June.
    20. Nassiri-Mofakham, Faria & Huhns, Michael N., 2023. "Role of culture in water resources management via sustainable social automated negotiation," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 86(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:17:p:7812-:d:1473631. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.